SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  | ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Thursday, Aug. 28, 2008 , 12:00 a.m.

Chattanooga: Soaring costs hurt utilities

Included in this article

Audio     
TimesFreePress Audio
Craig Mullinax
David Ashburn

Almost everyone in Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia is paying less for water than Chattanoogans who buy from Tennessee-American Water Co.

Chattanooga’s privately owned Tennessee-American Water Co. drew fire when it sought a rate increase to fund a $21.3 million capital program and to cover soaring costs for gas, chemicals and electricity.

Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia utility officials said public water utilities can operate more cheaply than private companies because they don’t have to make a profit and they answer to their customers.

But they said they aren’t spared the financial impacts of improvements, expansion, labor expenses and rising material costs.

“We’re seeing escalating prices in power costs. We’re seeing escalating prices in chemical and material costs,” said Craig Mullinax, manager of the water division at Cleveland Utilities.

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority power cheaper, more reliable, but operating costs still above average

PDF: TVA Inspector General Report

Article: Water rates for Signal, Walden’s Ridge to go up

Article: Tennessee: Regulators limit water company’s court cost recovery

PDF: Tennessee-American Water Rates

PDF: Water rate ruling

Article: Tennessee-American gets only fraction of rate increase

Article: TRA’s Roberson proposes only 4.3 percent increase for Tennessee-American rate hike

Article: Chattanooga: Final pleas made in water rate case

Article: Chattanoogan: Soaring costs hurt water utilities

Article: Hamilton County: Brooks seeks help for small utiliti

Article: Consultant challenges 'management audit' of Tennessee-American

Article: Chattanooga: Soaring costs hurt utilities

Article: Tennessee-American Water company increases differ

Article: Tennessee: $2 million battle over water rates

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hearing concludes today

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hike opponents address County Commission

Article: Chattanooga: Walden’s Ridge water service questioned

Article: Chattanooga: Water rate hearings begin

PDF: Tennessee American Water letter

Article:Chattanooga: McCormick calls for 'prudent decision' on water rate hike

Article: Groups join water rate hike fight

Article: Water in Chattanooga is pricey

PDF: Read the Allen & Hoshall June 2008 rate survey. It does not include Tennessee-American's average residential rates, but the company in its March 14 rate increase petition says the current average is $19.39.

Article: Tennessee: Full-fledged rate local rate hearing may be last

Article: Chattanooga: Group makes waves over water rate hike

PDF: Re: Filing

PDF: Supplemental Response and Objections

Article: City, state want water rates set 'correctly,' not quickly

PDF: Order from the Tennessee regulatory authority in Tennessee-American water rate case

Article: Tennessee Regulatory Authority limited in scope of power

Article: State, city won’t use disputed consultant in Tennessee-American rate case

Article: Resume in water company case removed from Web

Article: Water rate hike won’t immediately trickle down to municipalities

Article: Hamilton County Commission unanimously opposes water rate hike

Video: Water issues discussed

PDF: Delivering Service (from Tennessee-American)

PDF: IPO Filing

Article: Water rate hike protest planned

PDF: County auditor report on local water utilities

Article: Water rate hike makes waves with lawmakers

PDF: Tennessee-American Water's filing

Article: Tennessee-American Water seeks highest rate hike in history

Rising costs forced an 8.5 percent rate increase in July, Mr. Mullinax said. But Cleveland’s water customers understand the situation, he said.

“System improvements, trying to provide for future growth, all those things are a part of the overall budget process,” he said. “Typically, most folks understand.”

Jerry Lee, chairman of the utility in Catoosa County, said rates are set by publicly-elected officials who represent customers.

Mr. Lee said excess revenues for the district go back into the operation for improvements.

Catoosa Utility has raised rates twice in 11 years, most recently a $1 increase on monthly bills to start a fund for a filtration plant, he said. That increase was an investment to reduce future costs, he said.

Kim Dalton, Tennessee-American’s external affairs specialist, said the difference between public and private operations can’t be judged on rates.

“Our (minimum monthly) rate of $10.42 includes funds for services that the other utilities charge for like tapping fees, new customers deposits, new meters,” Ms. Dalton said. “Those items can be costly.”

She said people should understand that a private utility also falls under stricter regulations, especially when seeking a rate increase.

“Other agencies don’t have to go through what we’ve gone through just to ask for an increase,” she said. “And it’s a six-month process.”

But Ms. Dalton said the same factors that affect rates for public utilities — materials and power costs, improvements and labor expenses — also apply to private ones.

David Ashburn, with Walker County, Ga.’s water department, said that even the source of water has an impact on rates.

“If you’re pumping water that’s not under the influence of surface water (water in rivers and creeks), then you don’t have to run it through a water treatment facility,” Mr. Ashburn. “You just inject it with chlorine and send it on its way.”

Treatment plant operations use lots of electricity and chemicals that cost more now than they did just a few months ago, he said.

Mr. Ashburn said utility costs and rates also can be affected by leaks, age of infrastructure and debt repayment.

Lori McDaniel, with Georgia’s Dalton Utilities, said the utility there has “several different customer classes.” Ms. McDaniel said more expensive projects in some areas may require higher rates.

Officials in Monteagle, Tenn., just restructured their rate system to encourage people to conserve and to “reflect costs and construction,” said Jim Boynton, the public works director.

The restructuring reduced the minimum monthly bill from $22 to $16.60, but the water rate increases with usage, Mr. Boynton said.

“We charge $9 for every 1,000 gallons (above the 2,000-gallon minimum), so there’s an escalator for every 1,000 gallons used,” he said.

Mike Patrick, Dayton, Tenn.’s water superintendent, said the service there has tried to absorb rising expenses, but the cost of treatment chemicals forced an increase in July.

He said he hopes the utility can temporarily absorb the looming 20 percent TVA electric rate increase that takes effect in October. But his and most other utilities’ rates eventually will go up in response the increase, he said.

“It’s a domino effect with gasoline prices,” he said. High fuel prices affect all other costs, he said.

Comments

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Share This...

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Subscribe Here!
Staging homes

TOP HOMES

TOP JOBS
DIRECTORIES
BRIDAL | TRAVEL
HOME | NEWS | SPORTS | ENTERTAINMENT | MULTIMEDIA | BLOGS | PHOTOS
COMMUNITY | FYI
JOBS | HOMES | CARS | SHOP
Search:
Site | Archives | Web
View entire Site Map
Community: News | Correspondents
© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.