NASHVILLE — Positions taken by the Tennessee and Georgia legislatures over the years sometimes were at odds with lawmakers’ current-day stances on an old dispute over the states’ boundary, records show.
Georgia lawmakers, who are trying to reopen a controversy over an erroneous 1818 survey that set today’s border, say Peach State officials always have rejected and never officially accepted the boundary.
But records and news accounts show the Georgia House of Representatives only 36 years ago acknowledged the very same border lawmakers reject today.
“(M)embers of this body do hereby go on record as approving the boundary line currently recognized as such between the State of Georgia and the State of Tennessee, in the Chattanooga area,” states House Resolution 907, which passed 116-12 on March 8, 1972, according to Volume II of the Journal of the House of Representatives from that year.
In an e-mail, Georgia Sen. David Shafer, R-Duluth, who is pushing the latest look at the border issue, dismissed the Georgia House’s 1972 resolution, sponsored by then-Rep. Robert Peters, a Catoosa County Democrat.
“The 1972 resolution was never passed by the Senate or signed by the governor,” said Sen. Shafer, who argues Georgia’s border properly lies about 1.1 miles north of where it is today. “It does not have the force of law. The erroneous boundary line remains unratified.”
Article: Drought worries return
Article: Georgia water plan discussions begin
Article: Chattanooga: Area back on drought map following dry February
Article: Chattanooga: Record rains bring down drought-stressed trees
Article: Tennessee: Rain pulls much of region from drought designation
Article:Drought outlook brightens
Article:Drought not going away
Article: Chattanooga: Recent rains bring downgraded drought ratings
Article:Tennessee: Wet winter may battle drought/
Article:Dade County: Water restrictions vary, drought continues
Article: Georgia may tighten water restrictions again
Drought outlook brightens
Atlanta: 3 southern resevoirs predicted to fall
Water authority begins planning
North Georgia water supply study
Article: Perdue backs border battle over water
Drought persists in Dalton
Dalton: Carpet industry works to save water
Moving the state line won’t move water, Kiwanians told
Nashville: Water plans to assist state not combat Georgia
Amendment No. 1 to SB3044
Article: Bredesen signs Georgia border resolution
Article:
Berke warns of long fight with Georgia over water
PDF: House Joint Resolution 919
Video: Water issues discussed
Article:
North Georgia officials dislike new water restrictions law
Article:
Drought dries up TVA income
Article:
Lawmakers hand Perdue border war
Article:
Georgia abandons border commission, not boundary dispute
Article: Resolution rejecting Tennessee-Georgia boundary commission moves in Senate
PDF: PDF: House Joint Resolution 919
Article: High hurdles with latest water bid
Article: Old stances on border dispute differ from today
Article: Tennesseans won’t volunteer for Georgia citizenship
PDF: 1972 Georgia Resolutions
PDF: Tennessee Legislations on Border Issue
Article: State House rejects Georgia border proposal
Article: Georgia already owns land in Chattanooga
Article: Water sharing gives Tennessee, Georgia towns perspective on border war
Article: Georgia lawmaker tries to grab Tennessee constituents
Article: Georgia questions 1818 border approval
Article: Georgia House passes water bills
Article: Perdue thinks U.S. knows Georgia water needs
Article: Littlefield says Georgia officials should consider other solutions to water woes
Article: Drought not going away
Breaking News: Littlefield says Georgia officials should consider other solutions to water woes
Article: Top court may see border dispute
Article: Georgia not the peach in battles with neighbors
Article: Georgia border proposal could cost Hamilton $2.4 billion
Article: Atlanta smacked by wet kiss
Slideshow: Give Our Georgia Friends a Drink Day
Article: Resolution criticizing Georgia border flap flows
DOC: Polk resolution
Video: Water Delivery
Article: Atlanta smacked by wet kiss
Poll: Should Chattanooga and Tennessee share water from the Tennessee River with Atlanta?
Blog: Shafer: Take Chattanooga water delivery “for what it is”
Article: Georgia lawmakers, reporters greet Chattanooga representatives on water journey
Blog: Littlefield sees off Atlanta-bound delegation
Article: City representatives head to Atlanta
Article: Georgia officials say facts, law back their claim to river
Article: Georgia lawmaker addresses Tennessee leader on water war
Article: Beware of Chattanoogans bearing gifts
Article: Tennessee draws line on border dispute
Article: Water conservation on tap
PDF: Tapping the Tennesse River at Georgia's Northwest Cornern
Article: Atlanta may only need ‘big straw’
Article: Tennessee, Georgia governors to cross paths, with water fight brewing
Article: Tennesseans say Georgia all wet
Article: Georgia lawmakers approve border commission to correct state line
Article: Tapping water resources now and for future
Article: Water plan opponents vow to change, strengthen it
Article: Senate panel passes bill calling for border commissions
Article: Border war talk is borderline silly, policymakers say
Article: War of words over water
Article: Border dispute not first between Georgia and Tennessee
PDF: Border Resolution
Article: Georgia legislators stir border war talk
Article: Rain levels above normal for the year, but area still in drought
Article: Gov. Perdue signs water plan, eases pool restrictions
Article: Georgia lawmakers want Tennessee to share river
Article: Counties with water supplies seek restriction waivers
Article: Monteagle rest area shutdown has mixed impact
Article: Monteagle reservoir situation improves, but fears persist
Article: Drought impacts livestock
Article: Drought drains Allatoona
Article: Anglers away
Article: Water tug-of-war
Article: Ga., Ala., Fla. governors talk water sharing
Article: Mayors say water relief is coming
Article: Plumbers help Orme conserve water
Article: Following prayers, Georgia gets rain
Article: One of three water supplies to Monteagle to be cut
Article: Bradley-McMinn water plan can be example, officials say
Article: Monteagle gets special delivery of water
Article: Development, water shortages linked
Article: Monteagle seeks funds for water
Article: Drought boosts well drillers
Article: Rossville chooses to conserve water though using Tennessee River
Article: Bredesen opposes river transfers
Article: Georgia gets temporary water supply boost
Article: Perdue seeks water compromise with Florida, Alabama governors
Article: Utilities importing supplies as historic drought persists
Article: Searching for a water resource
Article: Chattanooga touts its 'liquid assets' to industries
Article: Wanted: Water
PDF: Testimony of Ken Givens, Commissioner
Atlanta attorney Brad Carver, who helped author a “white paper” for Georgia lawmakers on the border issue called “Tapping the Tennessee River at Georgia’s Northwest Corner: A Solution to North Georgia’s Water Supply Crisis,” agreed.
“(Neither) the Senate nor governor approved that House resolution,” he said in an e-mail. “The 35th parallel is still the State of Georgia’s legal boundary since the Georgia General Assembly has never ratified the incorrect survey.”
For their part, Tennessee lawmakers today argue the border is exactly where it should be, and they contend Georgia’s effort is little more than an attempt to gain access to the Tennessee River. The disputed area includes part of that river at Nickajack Lake in Marion County.
On Monday, the Tennessee House voted 91-0 for a resolution stating Tennessee would not participate in a boundary commission that the Georgia House and Senate approved last month in separate resolutions.
But in 1889 and again in 1905, Volunteer State lawmakers appeared more amenable to Georgia’s complaints.
“Whereas, There are grave doubts as to the location of the state line,” is the beginning of an act passed by the Tennessee General Assembly on April 3, 1889. The law authorized the governor to communicate with Georgia’s governor “for the purpose of having a joint survey looking to the settlement of the question in dispute.”
Legislation in 1905 said much the same, but no new survey appears to have ever been undertaken.
Chattanooga Mayor Ron Littlefield, who would lose part of his city if the boundary was pegged at the 35th parallel, first brought up the 1972 Georgia House resolution. His office cited news accounts of the House action in The Chattanooga Times.
Mayor Littlefield, who said he doesn’t take the Georgia actions seriously, noted he would “certainly hate to go to court and have someone produce this same document ... that it had been considered before by people in elected positions and authority and they had decided that the matter was resolved.”
Georgia lawmakers have said they might take the case before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has original jurisdiction over boundary disputes, if Tennessee fails to act.
Tennessee Sen. Andy Berke, D-Chattanooga, an attorney who is expected to handle the Tennessee House resolution in the Senate, said “citizens of Georgia, mapmakers and anyone who has taken geography in the last 200 years knows where the border between Georgia and Tennessee is.”
Tennessee Rep. Henry Fincher, D-Cookeville, who helped draw up legal portions of Tennessee’s resolution, chuckled when shown the Georgia resolution.
He said Georgia lawmakers long ago legally acquiesced to the current border and Peach State lawmakers in 1972 “very wisely and reasonably recognized it had been the boundary so long it needed to be the boundary.
“It just goes to show that folks were smarter in Georgia in 1972 than they apparently are in 2008 — at least as far as the legislature is concerned,” Rep. Fincher said.
As to whether Tennessee lawmakers’ actions back in 1889 and 1905 created problems for Volunteer State officials today, Rep. Fincher said, “I don’t think so. Again, with these things, nothing happened. Nothing ever changed.”
Georgia Sen. Shafer disagreed, noting that “it is ridiculous to suggest that this issue has been settled for 190 years. Tennessee itself has repeatedly acknowledged that the boundary line is wrongly marked and must be resurveyed.”
Staff writer Michael Davis contributed to this story.
Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.