SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  | ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Wednesday, March 12, 2008 , 12:00 a.m.

Old stances on border dispute differ from today

NASHVILLE — Positions taken by the Tennessee and Georgia legislatures over the years sometimes were at odds with lawmakers’ current-day stances on an old dispute over the states’ boundary, records show.

Georgia lawmakers, who are trying to reopen a controversy over an erroneous 1818 survey that set today’s border, say Peach State officials always have rejected and never officially accepted the boundary.

But records and news accounts show the Georgia House of Representatives only 36 years ago acknowledged the very same border lawmakers reject today.

“(M)embers of this body do hereby go on record as approving the boundary line currently recognized as such between the State of Georgia and the State of Tennessee, in the Chattanooga area,” states House Resolution 907, which passed 116-12 on March 8, 1972, according to Volume II of the Journal of the House of Representatives from that year.

In an e-mail, Georgia Sen. David Shafer, R-Duluth, who is pushing the latest look at the border issue, dismissed the Georgia House’s 1972 resolution, sponsored by then-Rep. Robert Peters, a Catoosa County Democrat.

“The 1972 resolution was never passed by the Senate or signed by the governor,” said Sen. Shafer, who argues Georgia’s border properly lies about 1.1 miles north of where it is today. “It does not have the force of law. The erroneous boundary line remains unratified.”

Article:Dade County: Water restrictions vary, drought continues

Article: Georgia may tighten water restrictions again

Article: Drought outlook brightens

Article: Atlanta: 3 southern resevoirs predicted to fall

Article: Water authority begins planning

PDF: North Georgia water supply study

Article: Perdue backs border battle over water

Article: Drought persists in Dalton

Article: Dalton: Carpet industry works to save water

Article: Moving the state line won’t move water, Kiwanians told

Article: Nashville: Water plans to assist state not combat Georgia

PDF: Amendment No. 1 to SB3044

Article: Bredesen signs Georgia border resolution

Article: Berke warns of long fight with Georgia over water

PDF: House Joint Resolution 919

Video: Water issues discussed

Article: North Georgia officials dislike new water restrictions law

Article: Drought dries up TVA income

Article: Lawmakers hand Perdue border war

Article: Georgia abandons border commission, not boundary dispute

Article: Resolution rejecting Tennessee-Georgia boundary commission moves in Senate

PDF: PDF: House Joint Resolution 919

Article: High hurdles with latest water bid

Article: Old stances on border dispute differ from today

Article: Tennesseans won’t volunteer for Georgia citizenship

PDF: 1972 Georgia Resolutions

PDF: Tennessee Legislations on Border Issue

Article: State House rejects Georgia border proposal

Article: Georgia already owns land in Chattanooga

Article: Water sharing gives Tennessee, Georgia towns perspective on border war

Article: Georgia lawmaker tries to grab Tennessee constituents

Article: Georgia questions 1818 border approval

Article: Georgia House passes water bills

Article: Perdue thinks U.S. knows Georgia water needs

Article: Littlefield says Georgia officials should consider other solutions to water woes

Article: Drought not going away

Breaking News: Littlefield says Georgia officials should consider other solutions to water woes

Article: Top court may see border dispute

Article: Georgia not the peach in battles with neighbors

Article: Georgia border proposal could cost Hamilton $2.4 billion

Article: Atlanta smacked by wet kiss

Slideshow: Give Our Georgia Friends a Drink Day

Article: Resolution criticizing Georgia border flap flows

DOC: Polk resolution

Video: Water Delivery

Article: Atlanta smacked by wet kiss

Poll: Should Chattanooga and Tennessee share water from the Tennessee River with Atlanta?

Blog: Shafer: Take Chattanooga water delivery “for what it is”

Article: Georgia lawmakers, reporters greet Chattanooga representatives on water journey

Blog: Littlefield sees off Atlanta-bound delegation

Article: City representatives head to Atlanta

Article: Georgia officials say facts, law back their claim to river

Article: Georgia lawmaker addresses Tennessee leader on water war

Article: Beware of Chattanoogans bearing gifts

Article: Tennessee draws line on border dispute

Article: Water conservation on tap

PDF: Tapping the Tennesse River at Georgia's Northwest Cornern

Article: Atlanta may only need ‘big straw’

Article: Tennessee, Georgia governors to cross paths, with water fight brewing

Article: Tennesseans say Georgia all wet

Article: Georgia lawmakers approve border commission to correct state line

Article: Tapping water resources now and for future

Article: Water plan opponents vow to change, strengthen it

Article: Senate panel passes bill calling for border commissions

Article: Border war talk is borderline silly, policymakers say

Article: War of words over water

Article: Border dispute not first between Georgia and Tennessee

PDF: Border Resolution

Article: Georgia legislators stir border war talk

Article: Rain levels above normal for the year, but area still in drought

Article: Gov. Perdue signs water plan, eases pool restrictions

Article: Georgia lawmakers want Tennessee to share river

Article: Counties with water supplies seek restriction waivers

Article: Monteagle rest area shutdown has mixed impact

Article: Monteagle reservoir situation improves, but fears persist

Article: Drought impacts livestock

Article: Drought drains Allatoona

Article: Anglers away

Article: Water tug-of-war

Article: Ga., Ala., Fla. governors talk water sharing

Article: Mayors say water relief is coming

Article: Plumbers help Orme conserve water

Article: Following prayers, Georgia gets rain

Article: One of three water supplies to Monteagle to be cut

Article: Bradley-McMinn water plan can be example, officials say

Article: Monteagle gets special delivery of water

Article: Development, water shortages linked

Article: Monteagle seeks funds for water

Article: Drought boosts well drillers

Article: Rossville chooses to conserve water though using Tennessee River

Article: Bredesen opposes river transfers

Article: Georgia gets temporary water supply boost

Article: Perdue seeks water compromise with Florida, Alabama governors

Article: Utilities importing supplies as historic drought persists

Article: Searching for a water resource

Article: Chattanooga touts its 'liquid assets' to industries

Article: Wanted: Water

PDF: Testimony of Ken Givens, Commissioner

Atlanta attorney Brad Carver, who helped author a “white paper” for Georgia lawmakers on the border issue called “Tapping the Tennessee River at Georgia’s Northwest Corner: A Solution to North Georgia’s Water Supply Crisis,” agreed.

“(Neither) the Senate nor governor approved that House resolution,” he said in an e-mail. “The 35th parallel is still the State of Georgia’s legal boundary since the Georgia General Assembly has never ratified the incorrect survey.”

For their part, Tennessee lawmakers today argue the border is exactly where it should be, and they contend Georgia’s effort is little more than an attempt to gain access to the Tennessee River. The disputed area includes part of that river at Nickajack Lake in Marion County.

On Monday, the Tennessee House voted 91-0 for a resolution stating Tennessee would not participate in a boundary commission that the Georgia House and Senate approved last month in separate resolutions.

But in 1889 and again in 1905, Volunteer State lawmakers appeared more amenable to Georgia’s complaints.

“Whereas, There are grave doubts as to the location of the state line,” is the beginning of an act passed by the Tennessee General Assembly on April 3, 1889. The law authorized the governor to communicate with Georgia’s governor “for the purpose of having a joint survey looking to the settlement of the question in dispute.”

Legislation in 1905 said much the same, but no new survey appears to have ever been undertaken.

Chattanooga Mayor Ron Littlefield, who would lose part of his city if the boundary was pegged at the 35th parallel, first brought up the 1972 Georgia House resolution. His office cited news accounts of the House action in The Chattanooga Times.

Mayor Littlefield, who said he doesn’t take the Georgia actions seriously, noted he would “certainly hate to go to court and have someone produce this same document ... that it had been considered before by people in elected positions and authority and they had decided that the matter was resolved.”

Georgia lawmakers have said they might take the case before the U.S. Supreme Court, which has original jurisdiction over boundary disputes, if Tennessee fails to act.

Tennessee Sen. Andy Berke, D-Chattanooga, an attorney who is expected to handle the Tennessee House resolution in the Senate, said “citizens of Georgia, mapmakers and anyone who has taken geography in the last 200 years knows where the border between Georgia and Tennessee is.”

Tennessee Rep. Henry Fincher, D-Cookeville, who helped draw up legal portions of Tennessee’s resolution, chuckled when shown the Georgia resolution.

He said Georgia lawmakers long ago legally acquiesced to the current border and Peach State lawmakers in 1972 “very wisely and reasonably recognized it had been the boundary so long it needed to be the boundary.

“It just goes to show that folks were smarter in Georgia in 1972 than they apparently are in 2008 — at least as far as the legislature is concerned,” Rep. Fincher said.

As to whether Tennessee lawmakers’ actions back in 1889 and 1905 created problems for Volunteer State officials today, Rep. Fincher said, “I don’t think so. Again, with these things, nothing happened. Nothing ever changed.”

Georgia Sen. Shafer disagreed, noting that “it is ridiculous to suggest that this issue has been settled for 190 years. Tennessee itself has repeatedly acknowledged that the boundary line is wrongly marked and must be resurveyed.”

Staff writer Michael Davis contributed to this story.

Comments

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Share This...

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Subscribe Here!
Remembering Spam

TOP HOMES

TOP JOBS
DIRECTORIES
BRIDAL | TRAVEL
Search:
Site | Archives | Web
Community: News | Correspondents
© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.