Breaking News
next news
prev news
published Monday, September 8th, 2008

Chattanooga: Growing population, land mass in city’s future

Audio clip

Ron Littlefield

As Chattanooga’s population grows, there will be a day when the city’s land mass grows with it, according to Mayor Ron Littlefield.

“We have the infrastructure already in place to serve a growing metropolitan city,” he said. “And the more we can share the cost of those services ... the lower the individual costs to taxpayers — the property owners — so that’s the important part of annexation and growth for the city.”

The city has not annexed any property since 2001 when U.S. Xpress and the area around the Bonny Oaks Drive exit off Interstate 75 were taken in, Mr. Littlefield said. While the city’s official growth plan includes annexing extensive tracts north of Hixson, around the Enterprise South industrial park and between the eastern city limits and Collegedale, any annexation plans are not on the “front burner” of city planning, he said.

But city services can be valuable to county residents because of the police and fire protection the city offers, along with sewer services, Mr. Littlefield said.

“Municipal services are important,” he said.

Although he said it could be “debatable,” Mr. Littlefield said city police protection is better because many county deputies are stretched thin. At the same time, the city’s paid fire department can provide better service than county volunteer fire departments, which also means lower fire insurance premiums for homeowners, he said.

BY THE NUMBERS

* 169,884: Estimated city population in 2007

* 155,554: Estimated population in 2000

* 144: Number of square miles the city occupies

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Hamilton County

FOLLOWING A ROADMAP

The city and county drew up an urban growth plan in 2001 that acts as a road map for municipal annexations, officials said. All municipalities across Tennessee are required to have these growth plans under state law.

Along with the tracts east and north of Chattanooga, the growth plan allows annexation by the city of some land to the west. But the city is hemmed in by Georgia to the south, along with Lookout Mountain to the south and Signal Mountain to the west.

The largest major annexation for the city happened in 1972 when 10 communities containing 32,000 people were annexed, according to the Chattanooga News-Free Press. The annexation included the DuPont plant in Hixson, large parts of Hixson, East Brainerd, Tyner, Murray Hills and Lake Hills.

A lot of the new growth in population has occurred on the fringes of the city around East Brainerd and Hixson, officials said. But as the city plans for growth, it also must plan for police and fire protection, along with sewer lines. Running sewer lines to the areas within the city’s growth plan would not be problematic, Public Works Administrator Steve Leach said.

“They’ve already got sewers in the area,” he said. “It’s serving certain subdivisions. It’s not universal, but it could be.”

Roads would be another concern, but county standards are similar to the city’s, so any roads not up to city standards could be refurbished, he said.

One major obstacle for annexation is fire protection, Mr. Littlefield said. Any annexation could increase the city’s fire insurance rating, meaning more costs to homeowners, if fire protection is stretched too thin, he said.

A new fire station planned at Enterprise South could help with annexation in that area by providing services and keeping insurance rates down, he said. The fire station in East Brainerd would need to be moved or a new one built before any annexation takes place, he said.

saying no

Joe Mitchell lives in Mountain Shadows subdivision, an unincorporated area on the eastern fringe of the city. Picking up brush at his home last week, Mr. Mitchell said he couldn’t see the value in being incorporated into Chattanooga. He said he has a septic tank that works fine, and police and fire protection seem OK.

There’s only one thing he sees that could happen, he said.

“The taxes would go up,” he said.

Mike Breakey, who lives next door to Mr. Mitchell in the subdivision, said he would need to know what the benefits of city services would be.

“I see a lot of expenses, very little gain,” he said.

City Councilman Jack Benson, who represents the east side of the city, said upfront costs such as improving sewers and roads can offset property taxes gained from existing homes. It could take years before the city sees a significant gain in new property tax collections because subdivisions and developments would have to be built and sold before taxes were collected, he said.

“I’ve seen some studies of annexed areas that shows it takes 15 years to bring service up to the level it needs to be,” he said.

Even before annexation, the city needs to take care of itself, he said.

“I do not want to annex another inch until we service what we already got,” Mr. Benson said.

HOW IT HAPPENS

For any annexation, Chattanooga first would conduct a study of the area being annexed to evaluate the costs and benefits for both the city and the affected residents, City Attorney Randy Nelson said. The study, along with a plan of services including sewer, roads, fire and police, is then given to the Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Association, he said. The planning commission gives a yes-or-no recommendation to the City Council on annexation and the council holds public hearings, he said. The council can approve annexation through a city ordinance, Mr. Nelson said.

about Cliff Hightower...

Cliff has worked for the Times Free Press for five years and covers Chattanooga city government. He previously covered Rhea County, as well as transportation and growth and development in Southeast Tennessee. A native of Maryville, Tenn., Cliff graduated in 2003 from the University of Tennessee with a bachelor’s degree in communications with an emphasis on journalism. Before coming to Chattanooga, he was a crime reporter with Hernando Today, a supplement of The Tampa (Fla.) ...

1
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.

Mayor Littlefield's priorities are screwed up.

Public art & paying Missy Crutchfield over a 100k per year plus her four assistants is a necessity in his eyes, yet apparently on call police officers being able to respond to emergency calls quickly, from home, because they have their cars & police gear with them at all times, is a luxury.

Look at their own words from 2008 http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/20...

"The fire station in East Brainerd would need to be moved or a new one built BEFORE any annexation takes place, he (Littlefield) said."

In 2008 Littlefield told the Times Free Press that the fire stations would have to be built before annexation, yet now his 2nd phase annexation made a bee line straight down East Brainerd Rd just to snag the new high school out of spite. It may be 3 years from now before a fire station is built close enough to serve that school quickly. So for the next 3 years post annexation the city's fire rating goes down, insurance rates go up & the newly annexed people are at greater risk due to being serviced from fire stations further away than their current Tri Community Volunteer service.

Jack Benson also told the Times Free Press in 2008 : City Councilman Jack Benson, who represents the east side of the city, said upfront costs such as improving sewers and roads can offset property taxes gained from existing homes. It could take years before the city sees a significant gain in new property tax collections because subdivisions and developments would have to be built and sold before taxes were collected. I’ve seen some studies of annexed areas that shows it takes 15 years to bring service up to the level it needs to be,”

Now is the wrong time to annex. Consolidated government would be the answer, the property tax would be lowered county wide and city taxes eliminated all together.

However to do that the city will have to shred its charter & the County Commissioners & County Mayor would kick Littlefield & the City Council's behinds in a county wide election for metro gov, & Littlefield is too much of a arrogant power monger to do what is best for the citizens & abdicate his throne.

It would be nice to see the City Council grow a spine & stop being Littlefield's rubber stamp of approval and exercise some checks & balances. Littlefield is clearly out of touch with both his constituents and reality.

Littlefield it's not a DEAL it's a growth plan and plans can be changed. And forced annexations where those who are being annexed have no vote, and no representation are not counted in those Federal grant dollars. They weigh against the city because it violates portions of the Civil Rights act which guarantees everyone the right to vote or have duly elected representatives to vote on their behalf. The county residents do not have that in this annexation. So while state law may allow it, federal law does not.

September 4, 2009 at 6:09 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, permissions and privacy policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2012, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.