published Thursday, August 6th, 2009

Upton: Learning from racial profiling

Racial profiling has gotten much media attention in recent weeks. It began with the arrest of Harvard professor Dr. Henry Louis “Skip” Gates Jr. That led to controversial remarks made by President Barack Obama, which provoked a passionate response of the Cambridge Police Department and finally resulted in a friendly drink on the White House lawn with all parties involved.

What actually happened? The professor felt disrespected, targeted and harassed in his own home. The police officer was simply answering a concerned call from a neighbor, and the nation responded with various voices. It’s difficult to sort out, but it does bring to light an issue that has appeared off and on through the years but this time ends with pleasantries.

Racial profiling, which is basically defined as “the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion or national origin,” has been a sore issue among minority communities for some time.

My own experiences with it began in college. I remember being pulled over with a group of other girls for absolutely no reason one night. The only thing we could think of was that our driver, though female, was a wearing a baseball cap and from a distance could have been mistaken for a black male.

The cop not only turned his patrol lights on but commanded her to stop driving with his bullhorn. After shining his flashlight in our faces and asking a few random questions, he let us go with no explanation.

I had friends who were sometimes stopped by campus police at our university and asked to produce proof that they attended school there.

Though I have had many positive experiences with police officers who have come to my rescue in time of need, offering protection, reassurance and direction, it remains that a high number of the black males I know have had some difficult situations with the legal system, even those who are college-educated, conservative-looking and with no history of breaking the law.

My father recently told me that even he — a pastor, missionary and teetotaler — was pulled over for allegedly driving drunk and that most all of his brothers and male relatives have had similar experiences.

Our country, a strange paradox of progression and deeply entrenched attitudes and beliefs, still struggles to live above prejudice as well as intense reactions to perceived mistreatment, both conscious and otherwise. And yet, that’s not the end of the story.

Which is what made the president’s “beer summit” so amazing. Some of us become so befuddled, defensive, fearful or angry about race that we’d rather retreat into our corners to mutter over it than sit with someone perceived as the “other” and hear their differing points of view.

I have been guilty. We are all products of our personal experiences, perspectives, opportunities (or lack thereof) and specific cultural histories. But if we can be brave enough to share our differing thoughts openly and respectfully, receptive enough to hear the other side, we won’t succumb to the dehumanizing attitudes we fear and dread. Perhaps our own “summits” could involve coffee, dinner invitations or open conversations with individuals who see life differently than we do.

For these reasons, the mending talk at the White House got my attention. I was greatly encouraged by the reminder that it’s possible to keep the dialogue going even when all parties don’t agree on everything and to meet somewhere in the middle when there’s no easy solution in sight.

Tabi Upton, MA, is a licensed professional counselor. E-mail her at tabiupton@bellsouth.net.

about Tabi Upton...

Tabi Upton, MA-LPC is a therapist at New Beginnings Counseling Center.

1
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
FreedomJournal said...

A Note On Racial Profiling

Did the recent arrest of Harvard Professor Skip Gates send a signal to the Black community that our President who is Black could have easily also been arrested for breaking into his own home? Just think about it? Professor Gates is a world renowned scholar. He is well known throughout the academic world and even by some that do not aspire to be historians or social scientists. Also Professor Gates most likely is very well known in the community in which he lives that is in close proximity to the Harvard campus in which he works.

So how did the officer come up with enough reason to arrest someone that had clearly proved that he was the lawful resident of the house he entered? Why didn’t the officer just leave? What happened? What would you have done if you returned from a trip to China to your house tired and frustrated. Meanwhile your door jams and you have to force yourself into your own residence. In the meantime someone calls the police believing that two men are breaking into your house.

So when Professor Gates proved by his identification that he lived at that address and worked at Harvard that should have been the end of the matter. Now what would have been your attitude if the officer continued to belabor the situation, for what? Just how many people would have not been HIGHLY irritated to be accused of breaking into their own home? Also just how many tempers would have been challenged in the case of someone with a mission to punish you for raising your voice in your own home?

Police are to be loved and respected. My brother-in-law (Ralph ‘Big Ralph’ Cothran) former Police Chief of Chattanooga, Tennessee who passed on in 1996 always told me he did not like the term cops. Chief Cothran also had an expressed mission to mend the historical friction between the Black community and the local police. This included racial profiling and police brutality. The word Cop to describe a police officer is a demeaning term. They are police officers. However we all are human. Professor Gates was upset and so was the officer. However do you have some legal right to be upset in your own home when accused of breaking and entering your place of residence. When the breaking and entering issue was resolved the case should have ended. However Professor Gates does not have to right to physically assault the officer or tongue lash him beyond words. But let’s be real. This should never have happened in the first place.

So racial profiling or not. We all must be aware of the circumstances of a given situation. With that said we must move to work out our difficulties in a fair and equitable manner. This did not happen. Could this have happened to any Black man? Why?

Carl A. Patton, FreedomJournal Press 6 August 2009 in the year of our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus.

August 6, 2009 at 1:53 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.