Chattanooga: Lawsuit aids to halt EPB cable venture

Wednesday, January 28, 2009


By:
Monica Mercer (Contact)

A class action lawsuit filed Tuesday against the city of Chattanooga, EPB and EPB Telecom says the power company has been installing infrastructure for its new cable business without acquiring proper permission from Hamilton County residents.

The civil action by residents is the first from EPB electric ratepayers to challenge how the city-owned utility is assessing most of the costs of the $219 million fiber-to-home initiative.

Every EPB customer is potentially affected by the lawsuit, attorney John Cavett said, and possibly could be entitled to compensation from EPB for improper use of their land.

Chattanooga and EPB already own easements — essentially rights-of-way to use other people’s property for a specific purpose — throughout the county and surrounding areas in order to transmit electricity to their customers.

Article: Chattanooga: Ready to go head to head

Article: Chattanooga: Reshaping the telecom landscape

Article:Chattanooga: Power cutoffs decline

Article:Chattanooga: Lawsuit aids to halt EPB cable venture

PDF: EPB Complaint

Article: Chattanooga: Media control center takes shape

Article: Chattanooga: EPB eyes contract for meters

Article: Chattanooga: EPB seeking cable franchise

Article: Chattanooga: AT&T targets cable competitors

PDF:Average EPB bill

Article: Chattanooga: EPB predicts wave of disconnections

Article: Chattanooga: EPB rolls out TV in March

Article: Tennessee: Cable appeals EPB case dismissals

PDF: Stamped Notice of Appeal

Article: Reshaping the telecom landscape

Article: Cable customers being switched one house at a time

Article: EPB set to invest in telecom gear

Article: Judge dismisses Comcast lawsuit

PDF: Comcast lawsuit opinion

Article: AT&T plans cable rollout

PDF: Lyles Decision to Motion to Alter or Amend

Article: Judge will rule next week on EPB suit

Article: EPB directors OK $26.4 million fiber loan

Article: Chattanooga: EPB to lend itself millions

Article: Tennessee: Cable group seeks EPB suit rehearing

PDF: EPB Official Statement

PDF: TCTA Motion to Alter or Amend

PDF: TCTA Notice of Filing

Article: Chattanooga: EPB gets loan at 4.6% for telecom plan

Article: Chattanooga: EPB finances fiber, Comcast strikes back in court

Article: Nashiville: House approves AT&T cable deal

PDF: TCTA Statement

PDF: Comcast vs. EPB

Article: EPB tries to wrap up bond issue

Article: EPB broadband bill dropped after open meetings amendment pops up

Article: Judge dismisses EPB lawsuit

Article: AT&T bill begins moving in House

Article: Lawmakers say AT&T bill should promote cable competition

Article: AT&T cable deal to be unveiled

PDF: Summary of the revised Competitive Cable

PDF: Resolution

Article: Chattanooga seeks federal funds for fiber-optics

PDF: Order Received from Chancellor Lyle re: TCTA v. EPBC

Article: EPB workers installing fiber-optic lines

Article: Hamilton County Commission gives EPB tax safety net

Article: Council approves EPB loan

Article: EPB delays fiber bonds

Article: Telecoms compete EPB set to challenge Comcast for local customers

Article: EPB faces cable lawsuit hearing March 7

Article: EPB approves fiber financing

Article: Littlefield leans toward AT&T in state cable fight

Article: Davidson judge lets cable suit against EPB proceed

Article: Naifeh, Bredesen disagree on cable

Article: Case hangs over EPB bond issue

Article: EPB filing in case says fiber plan is legal

Article: AT&T, cable fight nears $11 million

Article: EPB not ready to finance fiber-to-home project

Article: Judge considers dismissing EPB cable suit

Article: Ramsey says concerns about AT&T plan 'cleared up'

Article: Cable survey results challenge EPB video plan

Audio: Hamilton County Commission agenda session -- Nov. 13, 2007

PDF: Cable Survey

Article: EPB asks court to dismiss suit over cable TV

Article: Dueling video

Article: Cable TV drama ready for new season in state Legislature

Video: Cable competitor?

Article: EPB broadband wins Council OK

Article: AT&T to press state for franchise authority as council prepares to vote on EPB plan

Video: EPB seeks cable TV customers

Video: Competing for Cable Customers

PDF: Study of municipal cable providers

Article: Cable TV industry sues EPB to block broadband service

PDF: TCTA EPB Suit

Article: Fuel costs push up TVA electric rates

Article: Tech companies give input on EPB fiber-optic plan

Article: Public supports EPB fiber proposal

PDF: Comptroller's report on EPB telecom venture

PDF: Letter from Memphis City Council chairman

Article: EPB seeks input on fiber-optic plan

The lawsuit claims, however, that the city, EPB and its offshoot cable company, EPB Telecom, have begun using those easements to install cable. Such actions are illegal, Mr. Cavett asserted, citing case law from other jurisdictions.

A 2005 Tennessee Court of Appeals decision, for example, noted that “an easement’s use may change over time to accommodate technological development, but such changes must fall within the purposes for which the easement was created.”

In a statement e-mailed to the Times Free Press, EPB Senior Vice President of Finance Greg Eaves defended EPB’s actions and said that the placement of “a fiber optic Smart Grid” is meant only to “modernize” the company’s electric system.

“By adding some additional electronics, we can provide superior high speed Internet, video and phone to customers who choose to purchase them,” Mr. Eaves said.

The lawsuit, filed in Hamilton County Circuit Court, points to a 10-mile strip of land along Browntown Road in Soddy-Daisy, where EPB’s cables already run through the property of at least 75 owners who’ve agreed only to electricity easements.

Lead plaintiff David Mathews, of 6044 Browntown Road, lives along “one of many cable lines in Hamilton and adjacent counties,” the lawsuit states.

The issue of whether electric ratepayers are illegally paying for EPB’s cable venture has been argued for two years in courts in Chattanooga and Nashville.

The Tennessee Cable TV Association sued EPB in Davidson County Chancery Court in 2007, claiming EPB was illegally developing its EPB Telecom plan using electricity revenues. The lawsuit was judged to have been filed in the wrong jurisdiction, but the cable industry has appealed to the Tennessee Court of Appeals.

Last year, Comcast Corp., which operates the primary cable TV service in Chattanooga, filed a lawsuit in Hamilton County, claiming that EPB’s capital expenses from launching the telecommunications venture should not be funded by electric revenues.

A Hamilton County judge threw out the lawsuit last July.

Subscribe Here!
Tech Talk