SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Home » News » Local/Regional News » Tennessee-American appeals 2008 ...
Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Tennessee-American appeals 2008 rate case

Included in this article:      1 Comment    

NASHVILLE — The Tennessee-American Water Co. on Monday appealed a 2008 ruling that limited the amount of its rate increase on Chattanooga customers.

Last year, the Tennessee Regulatory Authority voted 2-1 to give the water company a $1.65 million rate increase on residents and businesses instead of the $7.64 million it sought.

In their state Court of Appeals filing, water company officials charged the authority’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious” and said the agency in its Jan. 13 final written order committed “an unconstitutional taking” of its property by denying Tennessee-American a “just and reasonable rate of return.”

Article: Tennessee-American appeals 2008 rate case

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority power cheaper, more reliable, but operating costs still above average

PDF: TVA Inspector General Report

Article: Water rates for Signal, Walden’s Ridge to go up

Article: Tennessee: Regulators limit water company’s court cost recovery

PDF: Tennessee-American Water Rates

PDF: Water rate ruling

Article: Tennessee-American gets only fraction of rate increase

Article: TRA’s Roberson proposes only 4.3 percent increase for Tennessee-American rate hike

Article: Chattanooga: Final pleas made in water rate case

Article: Chattanoogan: Soaring costs hurt water utilities

Article: Hamilton County: Brooks seeks help for small utiliti

Article: Consultant challenges 'management audit' of Tennessee-American

Article: Chattanooga: Soaring costs hurt utilities

Article: Tennessee-American Water company increases differ

Article: Tennessee: $2 million battle over water rates

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hearing concludes today

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hike opponents address County Commission

Article: Chattanooga: Walden’s Ridge water service questioned

Article: Chattanooga: Water rate hearings begin

PDF: Tennessee American Water letter

Article:Chattanooga: McCormick calls for 'prudent decision' on water rate hike

Article: Groups join water rate hike fight

Article: Water in Chattanooga is pricey

PDF: Read the Allen & Hoshall June 2008 rate survey. It does not include Tennessee-American's average residential rates, but the company in its March 14 rate increase petition says the current average is $19.39.

Article: Tennessee: Full-fledged rate local rate hearing may be last

Article: Chattanooga: Group makes waves over water rate hike

PDF: Re: Filing

PDF: Supplemental Response and Objections

Article: City, state want water rates set 'correctly,' not quickly

PDF: Order from the Tennessee regulatory authority in Tennessee-American water rate case

Article: Tennessee Regulatory Authority limited in scope of power

Article: State, city won’t use disputed consultant in Tennessee-American rate case

Article: Resume in water company case removed from Web

Article: Water rate hike won’t immediately trickle down to municipalities

Article: Hamilton County Commission unanimously opposes water rate hike

Video: Water issues discussed

PDF: Delivering Service (from Tennessee-American)

PDF: IPO Filing

Article: Water rate hike protest planned

PDF: County auditor report on local water utilities

Article: Water rate hike makes waves with lawmakers

PDF: Tennessee-American Water's filing

Article: Tennessee-American Water seeks highest rate hike in history

“We don’t believe the 2008 TRA order was just and reasonable to the company in several areas and we believe evidence presented by the company was not given appropriate consideration,” Tennessee-American President John Watson said in a statement.

Regulatory Authority spokesperson Jessica Johnson said Monday evening that agency attorneys had not seen the filing and were not in a position to comment.

Chattanooga attorney Rick Hitchcock, who helped represent the city of Chattanooga as it joined forces with the state’s Consumer Advocate and Protections Division and Chattanooga Manufacturers Association to oppose the water company’s increase, said he had not seen the actual petition, either.

“I don’t have any comment I can make at this point,” he said.

Nashville attorney Henry Walker, who helped represent local manufacturers, said historically the appellate court “has always given a great of discretion to the Regulatory Authority and I expect the same will be true here.”

Among other things, the water company is questioning whether the Tennessee Regulatory Authority’s decision to let the water company recover $3.5 million of its management fees instead of the $4.3 million it wanted was “arbitrary and capricious.”

Observers said the battle over Tennessee-American’s originally proposed 21.7 percent increase was one of the hardest-fought regulatory struggles in recent years. Tennessee Regulatory Authority directors reduced that to 4.37 percent for Chattanooga residential, industrial and commercial ratepayers.

1 Comment

How will they be able to stay in business?

Username: socalsally | On: March 17, 2009 at 2:59 p.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 0 people found this comment useful.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Only In Tomorrow's TimesFreePress
Four area bands traveling to prestigious parades and competitions
Most Recently Commented Stories
(113) Maine
(113) Maine
(16) Relief
Featured Business

© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2008, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.