Breaking News
next news
prev news
published Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

Tennessee-American appeals 2008 rate case

NASHVILLE — The Tennessee-American Water Co. on Monday appealed a 2008 ruling that limited the amount of its rate increase on Chattanooga customers.

Last year, the Tennessee Regulatory Authority voted 2-1 to give the water company a $1.65 million rate increase on residents and businesses instead of the $7.64 million it sought.

In their state Court of Appeals filing, water company officials charged the authority’s decision was “arbitrary and capricious” and said the agency in its Jan. 13 final written order committed “an unconstitutional taking” of its property by denying Tennessee-American a “just and reasonable rate of return.”

Article: Tennessee-American appeals 2008 rate case

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority power cheaper, more reliable, but operating costs still above average

PDF: TVA Inspector General Report

Article: Water rates for Signal, Walden’s Ridge to go up

Article: Tennessee: Regulators limit water company’s court cost recovery

PDF: Tennessee-American Water Rates

PDF: Water rate ruling

Article: Tennessee-American gets only fraction of rate increase

Article: TRA’s Roberson proposes only 4.3 percent increase for Tennessee-American rate hike

Article: Chattanooga: Final pleas made in water rate case

Article: Chattanoogan: Soaring costs hurt water utilities

Article: Hamilton County: Brooks seeks help for small utiliti

Article: Consultant challenges 'management audit' of Tennessee-American

Article: Chattanooga: Soaring costs hurt utilities

Article: Tennessee-American Water company increases differ

Article: Tennessee: $2 million battle over water rates

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hearing concludes today

Article: Tennessee: Water rate hike opponents address County Commission

Article: Chattanooga: Walden’s Ridge water service questioned

Article: Chattanooga: Water rate hearings begin

PDF: Tennessee American Water letter

Article:Chattanooga: McCormick calls for 'prudent decision' on water rate hike

Article: Groups join water rate hike fight

Article: Water in Chattanooga is pricey

PDF: Read the Allen & Hoshall June 2008 rate survey. It does not include Tennessee-American's average residential rates, but the company in its March 14 rate increase petition says the current average is $19.39.

Article: Tennessee: Full-fledged rate local rate hearing may be last

Article: Chattanooga: Group makes waves over water rate hike

PDF: Re: Filing

PDF: Supplemental Response and Objections

Article: City, state want water rates set 'correctly,' not quickly

PDF: Order from the Tennessee regulatory authority in Tennessee-American water rate case

Article: Tennessee Regulatory Authority limited in scope of power

Article: State, city won’t use disputed consultant in Tennessee-American rate case

Article: Resume in water company case removed from Web

Article: Water rate hike won’t immediately trickle down to municipalities

Article: Hamilton County Commission unanimously opposes water rate hike

Video: Water issues discussed

PDF: Delivering Service (from Tennessee-American)

PDF: IPO Filing

Article: Water rate hike protest planned

PDF: County auditor report on local water utilities

Article: Water rate hike makes waves with lawmakers

PDF: Tennessee-American Water's filing

Article: Tennessee-American Water seeks highest rate hike in history

“We don’t believe the 2008 TRA order was just and reasonable to the company in several areas and we believe evidence presented by the company was not given appropriate consideration,” Tennessee-American President John Watson said in a statement.

Regulatory Authority spokesperson Jessica Johnson said Monday evening that agency attorneys had not seen the filing and were not in a position to comment.

Chattanooga attorney Rick Hitchcock, who helped represent the city of Chattanooga as it joined forces with the state’s Consumer Advocate and Protections Division and Chattanooga Manufacturers Association to oppose the water company’s increase, said he had not seen the actual petition, either.

“I don’t have any comment I can make at this point,” he said.

Nashville attorney Henry Walker, who helped represent local manufacturers, said historically the appellate court “has always given a great of discretion to the Regulatory Authority and I expect the same will be true here.”

Among other things, the water company is questioning whether the Tennessee Regulatory Authority’s decision to let the water company recover $3.5 million of its management fees instead of the $4.3 million it wanted was “arbitrary and capricious.”

Observers said the battle over Tennessee-American’s originally proposed 21.7 percent increase was one of the hardest-fought regulatory struggles in recent years. Tennessee Regulatory Authority directors reduced that to 4.37 percent for Chattanooga residential, industrial and commercial ratepayers.

about Andy Sher...

Andy Sher is a Nashville-based staff writer covering Tennessee state government and politics for the Times Free Press. A Washington correspondent from 1999-2005 for the Times Free Press, Andy previously headed up state Capitol coverage for The Chattanooga Times, worked as a state Capitol reporter for The Nashville Banner and was a contributor to The Tennessee Journal, among other publications. Andy worked for 17 years at The Chattanooga Times covering police, health care, county government, ...

1
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
socalsally said...

How will they be able to stay in business?

March 17, 2009 at 2:59 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, permissions and privacy policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2012, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.