SITE MAP  |  MOBILE  |  EMAILS  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  ARCHIVES  |  CONTACT US  |  ADVERTISE  |  PROMOTIONS  |  SUBMIT EVENTS  |  FEEDBACK  |  PLACE AN AD  |  RSS FEEDS
Home » News » Local/Regional News » TVA weighs a ...
Monday, Nov. 16, 2009

TVA weighs a nuclear option

Agency considers Bellefonte choices and old versus new designs

Included in this article:      1 Comment    

Staff File Photo by Angela Lewis

TVA uncompleted Bellefonte Nuclear Plant is located near Hollywood, Ala.

Nearly four decades after the Tennessee Valley Authority decided to put a nuclear power plant in Northeast Alabama, directors of the federal utility will decide what type of reactor, if any, will be built there.

TVA President Tom Kilgore said last week he expects to make a recommendation to the utility's board in early 2010 about whether to reclaim TVA's original plant design or to pursue a next-generation reactor at the Bellefonte site in Hollywood, Ala.

Bellefonte, a 1,600-acre site along the Tennessee River, was to house the first new Westinghouse "advanced passive" reactor -- known as an AP1000 -- backed by a consortium of utilities and engineering companies. But a new study suggests it would be cheaper to finish Bellefonte's original Babcock & Wilcox-designed reactor that was mothballed before completion more than 20 years ago.

"We're balancing right now between finishing up what is already there at Bellefonte and the new technology of the AP1000," Mr. Kilgore told reporters and editors of the Chattanooga Times Free Press last week. "As we have looked at our options again, candidly we have recognized that there was a lot of money invested at Bellefonte and it would be good if we could see our way to finish that."

TVA spent $4.5 billion over 14 years on the twin-reactor plant at Bellefonte, but work was halted in 1988 when power demand growth slowed.

By 2006, the utility switched gears and moved toward building next-generation reactors that proponents said would be simpler, safer and cheaper.

In the new study, TVA engineers advocate restarting work at Bellefonte to meet predicted power needs and the utility's goal of generating 50 percent of its power from low or zero carbon-emitting sources by 2020.

The 407-page study concludes that finishing the original plant would average 50 cents to 90 cents less per megawatthour than either building an AP1000 units or building nothing and buying power from other power producers.

hearing looks at options

TVA plans a public hearing in Scottsboro, Ala., on Dec. 8 to review its environmental assessment of Bellefonte. Mr. Kilgore said a final report will be prepared in time for the TVA board to pick an option for Bellefonte before next summer.

Slideshow: Bellefonte future

Article: Step-by-step approach improves TVA performance

Article: Nuclear options for Bellefonte

Article: Georgia leads way in next generation of nuclear design

PDF: NRC letter to TVA

PDF: B&W nuclear reactor

Article: TVA eyes Oak Ridge nuclear plant

PDF: Sen. Lamar Alexander speech

Article: Alexander wants 100 reactors

Article: Georgia likely site for nuke’s new design

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority urged to increase nuclear power at Bellefonte

PDF: NRC concerns about Bellefonte permit

PDF: List of proposed reactors

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority seeks green power from windy Midwest

Article: Advocates push for more green power use

PDF: TVA renewable purchases

PDF: NRC comments on Bellefonte license

Article: Salvaging Bellefonte

PDF: NRC Bellefonte report

PDF: TVA renewable power

Article: Tennessee: TVA considers more renewable power

Article:Union rips Tennessee Valley Authority guard changes

Article: Tennessee: NRC OKs new work at Bellefonte

PDF: NRC Bellefonte permits

Article: Chattanooga: Nuclear power touted as solution to U.S. energy woes

PDF: Sequoyah order

Article: Tennessee: TVA guard falsified records, report says

Article: Prepping for a nuclear rebound

Article: Lining up for nuclear revival

PDF: Draft GNEP impact study

Article: East Tennessee makes push for nuclear fuel recycling site

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority power cheaper, more reliable, but operating costs still above average

Article:Tennessee: Area aglow over nuclear growth

Article: Chattanooga: Capitol ambitions held for cell Wamp says fuel unit tested at UTC lands $3.5 million in taxpayer money

Article: Lawmakers say lower gas prices shouldn’t dampen focus on energy

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority urges conservation to limit rate impact

Article: Tennessee: Staying beneath the debt cap

Article:Tennessee Valley Authority cuts contract for nuclear security

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority rate increase electrifies Congress

Article: Tennessee Valley Authority to study reviving Bellefonte reactors

Article: New Energy Reform Act of 2008

Article: Chattanooga: Law enforcement learns about transuranic waste

Article: Chattanooga: Nuclear may power local jobs

Article: Tennessee: New nuclear plants get more expensive

Environmentalists warming up to nuclear energy options

TVA a player in nuclear’s comeback

Nuclear waste shipments in Chattanooga growing sharply

Nuclear poised to take slice of energy pie

TVA gave up its construction permit for Bellefonte in 2006, but the NRC agreed in March to reinstate the construction permit for a "terminated plant."

The utility still must convince regulators to revive an active construction permit before work could resume, spokesman Roger Hannah said. The units are about 50 percent complete, and some of the original equipment is outdated or has been removed, the utility estimates.

Anti-nuclear activists already are questioning TVA's approach.

"The old era of nuclear power should really come to a close, and it just doesn't make sense to try to revive a 1970s-era power plant," said Ed Lyman, senior scientist for the Union of Concerned Scientists. "The opportunities are there if you are going to build new nuclear power plants to achieve significant increases in safety and security through greatly improved designs."

Stephen Smith, executive director of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, criticized TVA for "rushing into a decision" about Bellefonte before the agency completes its power planning process and without a full board.

Only six of the nine board seats are filled and the term of member Bill Sansom will end next month.

"Demand for electricity has dropped precipitously, so there is no hurry to rush into any decision about Bellefonte," Mr. Smith said.

demand for power

TVA projects it will need at least one reactor from Bellefonte by 2018, Mr. Kilgore said.

The federal utility now is building America's only new nuclear reactor at Watts Bar near Spring City, Tenn.

The Unit 2 reactor there is due to begin generating power in 2012 and, even with reduced power demand, TVA projects another plant will be needed in 10 years.

"As the (Tennessee) Valley grows, we're going to build more nuclear power for our baseload generation," Mr. Kilgore said. "Our goal is to build nuclear, which has no carbon, no sulfur and no nitrogen. It's the best thing out there."

TVA now derives a third of its power from its six reactors at Browns Ferry in Alabama and Sequoyah and Watts Bar in Tennessee.

Redesigning AP1000

Last month, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ordered Westinghouse to redesign or retest the reactor shield building on the AP1000 to withstand an earthquake or natural disaster better.

The move could delay design work or construction for 14 reactors, including two twin-reactor projects in Georgia and South Carolina. Westinghouse designers will meet with NRC officials Monday but spokesman Vaughn Gilbert said the company is confident the design will be certified by 2011 and the first plants online in 2016. "The NRC review is part of the process, and although it may require some additional tests or some redesign, we are still confident the AP1000 will be approved," he said.

SOUND OFF

TVA will conduct an open house from 4 to 8 p.m. Dec. 8 at the Goose Pond Civic Center in Scottsboro, Ala., to hear comments on whether the original Bellefonte nuclear reactors should be finished, a new unit should be built or no plant should be erected there.

1 Comment

We are much better off with Bellefonte and cheap nuclear power. Until alternative fuels are cost effective, competitive, can produce in the 100-1000 Mw range, all they do is raise the cost of cooling and heating for poor families that can't insulate their homes or afford high efficiency units.

Zero emission cheap power that has served us well for 40+ years. Lower bills and bringing in more jobs like VW, Toyota, Nissan, Honda. I'm for more of that...

Username: Fryyo | On: November 16, 2009 at 12:32 p.m.
Did you find this comment to be useful? Yes | No
0 of 0 people found this comment useful.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Posted comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. To view complete guidelines for submitting content, comments and feedback, click here.

Only In Tomorrow's TimesFreePress
Why candy's dandy for sweethearts on Valentine's Day
Posted: Tuesday - Feb. 9, 2010
Hamilton County Sheriff's Office booking reports
Posted: Tuesday - Feb. 9, 2010
Toyota dealers busy handling recall work
Posted: Tuesday - Feb. 9, 2010
VW hires first production workers
Shop
Search Local Items

Classifieds/Place and Ad
Search Local Items

Jobs
Enter keyword or select from below..
Homes
Search for your home...
Cars
Search for your car...
Find a Business

© Copyright, permissions and privacy policy Copyright ©2010, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.