published Saturday, August 14th, 2010

Georgia lawmakers support repealing birthright citizenship

U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants are not the same as those born to legal permanent residents or citizens, an area Georgia lawmaker says.

“They are not the same and should not be treated the same,” said U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., who is a co-sponsor of the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009. “I don’t think it’s right, I think it’s unfair to our citizens and our permanent legal residents who have come to this country the right way.”

The U.S. Constitution grants citizenship to anyone born in America, no matter if the child’s parents are citizens or illegal residents. But some citizens and lawmakers across the nation, including Georgia, say that provision should be reviewed if not repealed.

“I believe only individuals whose parents were legally in the United States should be given the privilege of American citizenship,” U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., wrote in an e-mail.

Some who work with the Hispanic community, the group with the largest share of illegal immigrants, say the issue should go beyond politics.

“It’s a way to punish and penalize the immigrant, and the way they do it is by punishing their children,” said Dr. Pablo Perez, an internal medicine specialist and member of the Latin American Community Alliance in Dalton, Ga.

“It’s a discriminatory and inhumane way to treat defenseless children who deserve all the benefits that come with being born in U.S. soil,” Perez said.

The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 would only grant birthright citizenship for children with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen, legal permanent resident or an alien serving in the military.

Similar bills have been introduced at least since the 1990s and by former U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal since at least 2005.

Some lawmakers say the bill is not about changing the Constitution, but about clarifying the interpretation of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.

Robert Blitt, associate professor of law at the University of Tennessee College of Law, said the amendment had a specific intention.

“The drafters of the 14th Amendment were really talking about preventing citizenship to people that had allegiance elsewhere, (like) diplomats or people who were bound by other law, like Native Americans or enemy aliens,” Blitt said.

And reinterpreting or amending the Constitution can lead to many issues, including human rights, he said.

“What kind of paperwork and bureaucratic process are you going to force people and families to go through in documenting or proving to whatever satisfactory level is set?” he asked.

There’s also “a possibility of putting children who end up here and know nothing but the experience of living here with the prospect of having to be sent to (somewhere) that they have never been to or know nothing about. It’s very daunting,” he said.

Some opposed to birthright citizenship say illegal immigrants deliberately bear “anchor babies” so their parents can eventually legalize their status.

“Automatic birthright citizenship serves as a magnet to illegal immigration and opens the door to billions of U.S. tax dollars in social services going to illegal immigration,” wrote U.S. Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga.

A U.S. citizen can only petition for a parent who lives abroad after reaching adulthood, according to local immigration attorney Terry Olsen. But parents who entered the country illegally will not be able to gain authorization to live in the United States, he said.

Gingrey doesn’t think the Birthright bill has a chance to pass this year, but he said that, because of the recession and high unemployment rates, “the time is getting nearer in which we will deal with it,” he said.

The United States is not the only country grappling with this issue. Israel moved Sunday to deport the children of hundreds of migrant workers. Under Israeli law, the children are not automatically granted residency status.

about Perla Trevizo...

Perla Trevizo joined the Chattanooga Times Free Press in 2007 and covers immigration/diversity issues and higher education. She holds a master’s degree in newswire journalism from Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid, Spain, and a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Texas. In 2011 she participated in the Bringing Home the World international reporting fellowship program sponsored by the International Center for Journalists, producing a series on Guatemalan immigrants for which she ...

Other National Articles

1
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Wilder said...

Given when the law was written, and the events that had just taken place, anyone with common sense can figure out the original intent of the law.

The irony of this issue is that the very people that the law was written to benefit are now being harmed by it. African Americans are the citizens most likely to be displaced from the job market by the massive illegal influx.

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_events_14th.html

"The Fourteenth Amendment was one of three amendments to the Constitution adopted after the Civil War to guarantee black rights."

In Dalton, the group most harmed is poor whites from Southern Appalachia - the employee of choice, until the carpet cartel discovered an even cheaper source of labor.

“It’s a way to punish and penalize the immigrant, and the way they do it is by punishing their children,” said Dr. Pablo Perez, an internal medicine specialist and member of the Latin American Community Alliance in Dalton, Ga.

Dr. Perez, like many others, is only in Dalton as a result of the carpet cartel's highly successful illegal alien recruiting campaign. Thanks again guys.

And yes, Dr. Perez has displaced an English-speaking Dalton doctor - an example of the fallacy of "they only take jobs Americans aren't willing to do" nonsense.

I can only imagine what would happen if American Citizens, under similiar circumstances, barged into Mexico with the same brash critizisms and demands.

August 14, 2010 at 10:47 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.