Breaking News
published Thursday, January 7th, 2010

Proposed TennCare trims 'devastating'

Audio clip

Brennan Francois

TennCare officials are eyeing what providers call "devastating" cuts to benefits that include rehab services and inpatient hospital care, all in an effort to meet state-mandated budget reductions.

"These are painful decisions that are having to be made," said Kelly Gunderson, spokeswoman for TennCare, the state's Medicaid program. "In normal circumstances, these are (benefits) we would not be touching."

The TennCare Bureau is seeking approval from the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the cuts, which would save the state $117 million in the fiscal year that begins July 1.

Declining revenues forced state-mandated cuts for all agencies, state officials said. The budget restrictions, paired with a 4.5 percent increase in TennCare enrollment, mean that bureau officials are seeking to trim $350 million from next year's budgeted expenditures, Ms. Gunderson said.

The proposed changes, most of which would not affect pregnant women and children, include a $10,000 annual cap on inpatient hospital and psychiatric hospital services; elimination of physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech therapy coverage; elimination of hospice care; and an annual limit of eight doctor's office and nonemergency hospital visits.

Those limits would almost certainly be exceeded by those with chronic conditions such as cancer that require repeated medical treatments, Rae Bond, executive director of the Chattanooga and Hamilton County Medical Society, said.

TennCare providers, already stretched financially, will face more losses for providing care, she said.

"Who's going to be responsible in the cases when patients reach their limit but continue to have health problems?" she said.

Budget Still Not finalized

Providers are holding out hope that the proposed reductions could be avoided if extra funding is freed up in the next few months. The final state budget likely won't come until later this spring.

"We're trying not to get down into that doomsday scenario," said Jim Brexler, CEO of Erlanger hospital, the area's safety-net hospital.

He noted that a single admission for a trauma patient would likely exceed the proposed $10,000 cap on inpatient hospital services.

Federal economic stimulus money allowed TennCare to delay the bulk of a mandated 15 percent cut in the current fiscal year, including a 7 percent decrease in TennCare reimbursements to doctors. That payment cut is now scheduled to go into effect July 1, Ms. Gunderson said.

Craig Becker, president of the Tennessee Hospital Association, said before making these cuts, alternatives such as using money from the TennCare reserves should be considered.

"That's what it's there for," he said. The reserve fund totals about $350 million.

The proposed cuts to rehabilitation services would be "devastating," and would hurt the state budget in the long-term, said Bob Main, president and CEO of Siskin Hospital for Physical Rehabilitation.

Rehab not only improves patients' quality of life, he said, it helps get patients back into the workforce and keeps them financially independent.

"The state doesn't really care about people getting back into the workplace and having a productive life," Mr. Main said.

Parkridge Valley Hospital CEO Brennan Francois said that while few patients would ever reach the proposed $10,000 cap on inpatient psychiatric hospital care today, the proposed limits to outside support services could result in more patients needing hospitalization.

"If we're not consistent with our medication and the support that is necessary for helping people maintain their treatment plan, that a lot of times leads to a crisis situation," he said.

PROPOSED TENNCARE CUTS - graphic

If approved by CMS and included in the fiscal year 2011 budget, these changes would go into effect July 1 and save the state $117 million in the fiscal year. (Populations who are excluded from the limits are noted in parentheses.)

* Implement a $2 copay on nonemergency transportation (pregnant women and children excluded)

* Impose annual limit of $10,000 per person on inpatient hospital and inpatient psychiatric hospital services (pregnant women and children excluded)

* Limit nonemergency visits to outpatient hospitals to eight, per person (pregnant women and children excluded)

* Impose annual limit of eight physician office visits per person (pregnant women and children excluded)

* Limit lab and x-ray services per person to eight occasions (days) (pregnant women and children excluded)

* Eliminate coverage for occupational therapy, speech therapy and physical therapy (children excluded)

* Eliminate hospice care, though patients still would get medical care such as pain management (children excluded)

Source: TennCare Bureau

about Emily Bregel...

Health care reporter Emily Bregel has worked at the Chattanooga Times Free Press since July 2006. She previously covered banking and wrote for the Life section. Emily, a native of Baltimore, Md., earned a bachelor’s degree in American Studies from Columbia University. She received a first-place award for feature writing from the East Tennessee Society of Professional Journalists’ Golden Press Card Contest for a 2009 article about a boy with a congenital heart defect. She ...

2
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Tishers said...

Quote:: Limit lab and x-ray services per person to eight occasions (days) (pregnant women and children excluded) EndQuote::

Yea, that sounds just peachy. If you are taking blood thinners for a heart condition your doctor will want lab work every month.

Should we just tell diabetics to get used to the idea of losing your legs and vision? "Don't worry, we can give you a wheelchair and a cane, they are cheap."

January 11, 2010 at 1:57 p.m.
bj7979 said...

THIS IS PAR FOR THE COURSE. I WORK IN THE MEDICAL FIELD BUT I ALSO HAVE A DISABLED SON, AS OF 11/2 YRS AGO. HE HAS PARALYSIS ON HIS LT SIDE FROM AN ACCIDENT. YOU KNOW HE WOULD BE A WHOLE LOT FARTHER IN HIS RECOVERY PROCESS IF IT WEREN'T FOR OUR WONDERFUL INSURANCE COMPANIES THAT WE PAY DEARLY FOR. HIS PRIMARY INSURANCE IS UHC, HIS SECONDARY IS TNCARE. IT HAS BEEN A CONTINUOUS BATTLE. HE HAD ACTUALLY GOTTEN TO THE POINT OF WALKING WITHOUT HIS CANE WHEN UHC SAID "OH NO, HE'S DOING TO WELL, HE DOESN'T NEED ANYMORE THERAPY". SO THEY SENT HIM HOME TO "DRAW UP", LITERALLY. NOW HE HAS HAD TO HAVE A BACLOFEN PUMP PUT IN AND WE JUST PRAY THAT THIS WORKS. OH YES, THANK GOD FOR THESE INSURANCE CO'S WE HAVE. AND, NOW, THEY WANT TO TAKE AWAY MORE? YOU KNOW, BRAIN INJURY PATIENTS SEEM TO BE MISUNDERSTOOD. IS THE POINT HERE JUST TO SEND PATIENTS HOME TO DRAW UP AND DIE? I JUST HOPE THAT ONE OF OUR "PEOPLE IN HIGHER SEATS" HAVE TO GO THRU THIS ONE DAY. LET ONE OF THEIR LOVED ONES BE SUFFERING AND THEY HAVE TO DEPEND ON OUR GOVERNMENT TO MAKE THE DECISIONS ON WHETHER THEY GET BETTER OR JUST WITHER AWAY,

January 12, 2010 at 9:02 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, permissions and privacy policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2012, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.