published Sunday, November 28th, 2010

Extended jobless benefits near end

Before this year, Ken Gibson always has been able to find work fixing computers or doing maintenance or construction jobs.

But since he was laid off from his pipe-fitting job at Jake Marshall Services in March, the 52-year-old Chattanoogan has had to rely upon his $207 weekly jobless benefit check from the government.

"I've never seen it this bad; it's been a miserable year for my wife and [me]," Gibson said after searching for work again last week at the Tennessee Career Center in Chattanooga. "I don't know what I'll do when my benefits run out."

Gibson is among more than 125,000 unemployed people in Tennessee and Georgia who could lose their extended jobless benefits this winter unless Congress approves an extension. Nationwide, nearly 2 million Americans could lose their extended benefits by the end of the year.

Before the Thanksgiving break, the U.S. House of Representatives fell short of the two-thirds majority needed to fast-track another extension. Republicans objected to the $12.5 billion cost of another three-month extension without cutting spending elsewhere. Benefits will begin to expire Wednesday.

U.S. Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., could cast one of the last votes in his 16-year congressional career on the benefit extensions if the House takes up the issue when Congress reconvenes this week.

"I think we should extend these benefits, but we've got to find a way to start paying for these things," Wamp said. "If the November elections this year were about anything, they were to quit just borrowing money and start cutting some government programs to pay for what you are spending on."

Wamp's successor, Rep.-elect Chuck Fleischmann, said he hasn't decided if he would support another extension of jobless benefits should the issue arise again next year.

"I do think we've got to have fiscal responsibility and really rein in government spending," he said.

Earlier extensions stretched benefits for some long-term unemployed people to 99 weeks -- the longest since the benefits were established during the Great Depression.

"We've never experienced a downturn like this since the 1930s," said Georgia Labor Commissioner Michael Thurmond, an advocate for extending benefits again. "We have just not had the job growth necessary to get the unemployed back to work. Having no job or no unemployment benefits equals misery for millions of Americans."

Debate over benefits

Thurmond rejects claims that many unemployed people don't want to work as long as they get jobless benefits.

"There may be a few people who game the system, but the vast majority of people would trade an unemployment check for a paycheck any day of the week," Thurmond said. "Unfortunately, today we have five job seekers for every job opening."

But the economy is beginning to improve, and some argue that continual extension of jobless benefits discourages workers from seeking new jobs.

"Sometimes a good way to see unemployment numbers go down is to cut unemployment benefits," said Scott DesJarlais, the Republican physician from Jasper elected to succeed U.S. Rep. Lincoln Davis, D-Tenn., in Tennessee's 4th Congressional District.


* 2 million: Jobless Americans who could lose extended benefits if Congress doesn't approve another extension.

* 43,425: Tennesseans who could lose extended benefits

* 84,000: Georgians who could lose extended benefits

* $275: Maximum weekly unemployment benefit in Tennessee

* $330: Maximum weekly unemployment benefit in Georgia

* 127,184: Tennesseans getting unemployment benefits

* 210,769: Georgians getting unemployment benefits

Sources: National Employment Law Project, Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Georgia Department off Labor

"There are jobs that people may not want to take that they would if their unemployment benefits were cut," DesJarlais said.

Nationwide, the average jobless benefit is $310 a week, or $20 a week more than working full time at a minimum-wage job. The average benefit in Tennessee and Georgia is less than $225 a week.

Bill Fox, director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Tennessee, said many jobs in home construction and financing may never return to the levels they stood at before the recession. Other jobs continue to be automated or to move to lower-wage countries, he said.

"There are many jobs that are lost and probably won't be coming back even once the recession is over," Fox said. "This is a situation that will be with us for quite a while and is causing real structural, long-term changes in the labor market."

Rose Burns, 34, lost her job in early 2009 when R.L. Stowe closed its Chattanooga textile mill. The extended jobless benefit of $225 a week has helped make it possible for her to pursue a new career in social work at Chattanooga State Community College.

"The benefits help out a lot and are almost better than getting a fast-food job," she said.

Trust fund challenge

State unemployment insurance funds are financed by a payroll tax on employers, and pay benefits to workers for the first six months of unemployment. The extended benefits, as well as the related trade readjustment assistance for workers who lose their jobs to imports, are paid by the federal government.

The recession drained most state funds, forcing 32 states to borrow money from the federal government to keep paying jobless benefits.

Tennessee's fund stood at more than $600 million two years ago, but even though employer tax rates were raised in 2009, the state borrowed $50 million earlier this year to overcome a short-term shortfall.

Fox said another shortfall could develop and require more borrowing in March, but under law the state fund must be debt-free by the end of its fiscal year on June 30.

Georgia has borrowed $467 million after draining a $1.2 billion surplus before the recession hit.

"We'll be able to repay the loan once the economy eventually recovers and jobs come back," Thurmond said.

Extended jobless benefits in Georgia pump more than $18 million into the state's economy every week.

"The primary purpose of unemployment insurance is to mitigate the damage to local economies," Thurmond said. "This helps not only the recipients but others who rely upon unemployed persons still being able to buy groceries and pay their rent while they look for another job."

Click here to vote in our daily poll: Should Congress extend jobless benefits?

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
nowfedup said...

"There are jobs that people may not want to take that they would if their unemployment benefits were cut," DesJarlais said.

Well let's see the list of all those great jobs, benefits and such. Note being in Congress is not to be included.

November 28, 2010 at 10:52 a.m.
sideviews said...

Republicans want to keep the tax breaks for the wealthy without paying for such a tax extension, but they won't extend jobless benefits for those ltrying to find work but unable to secure employment. We see who the GOP represents.

November 28, 2010 at 3:23 p.m.
TeaParty330 said...

Scott DesJarlais is to be commended for speaking the truth. Unemployment benefits shouldn't continue for two years. That's welfare, not transitional assistance.

November 28, 2010 at 3:32 p.m.
acerigger said...

Teaparty, please offer up YOUR solutions to the problem of abandoning millions of laid-off(through no fault of their own)people.

November 28, 2010 at 6:08 p.m.
yaffay said...

It is important to note that unemployment benefits only go to people who have been previously employed for a specified length of time who have payed a surtax on wages to help fund the program. Hardly welfare.

November 28, 2010 at 7:42 p.m.
TeaParty330 said...

The payments into the Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds administered by the states pay for six months of benefits. But the extended unemployment benefits, now up to 99 weeks for some recipients, are paid beyond the initial 26 weeks by the federal government and those benefits exceed what people paid in surtaxes on wages to fund the program. The extra $12.5 billion expense to again extend jobless benefits another three months, if Congress grants the extension, will come out of the federal treasury, not state Unemployment Insurance trust funds. That's Uncle Sam giving a type of welfare assistance to long-term unemployed persons, many of whom can make as much or nearly as much by not working as they can by taking another job.

November 28, 2010 at 8 p.m.
acerigger said...

Yes,yes,we know all that teaparty,but what's YOUR solution,as I asked earlier?

November 28, 2010 at 10:55 p.m.
Dumbledore403 said...

Tea- One more thing...I bet you have not needed to be looking for a job during this time either...or I bet you be singing a different tune. Please understand that a lot of us would be working if we could only get a job...but for one reason or another have not found one.

November 28, 2010 at 11:35 p.m.
acerigger said...

I'm gonna wager that "teaparty" either has a good job,or a nice pension to live on,not to mention SSI benefits, along with Medicare, and maybe even a disability payment of some sort. Please correct me if I'm wrong about any of this,but you sound like most of the other selfish teabaggers.

November 29, 2010 at 3:07 p.m.
rolando said...

Is there a REAL reason why this article and the responses ALL date back more than four months? [Other than this rag wanting to stir up an argument, of course, and add even more discord and divisiveness among the American voters, as if we don't have enough.]

How about an update on this topic, Mr Flessner?

April 18, 2011 at 5:25 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.