published Friday, August 12th, 2011

Federal appeals court strikes health insurance requirement

GREG BLUESTEIN, Associated Press

ATLANTA — A federal appeals court panel on Friday struck down the requirement in President Barack Obama's health care overhaul package that virtually all Americans must carry health insurance or face penalties.

The divided three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the so-called individual mandate, siding with 26 states that had sued to block the law. But the panel didn't go as far as a lower court that had invalidated the entire overhaul as unconstitutional.

The states and other critics argued the law violates people's rights, while the Justice Department countered that the legislative branch was exercising a "quintessential" power.

The decision, penned by Chief Judge Joel Dubina and Circuit Judge Frank Hull, found that "the individual mandate contained in the Act exceeds Congress's enumerated commerce power."

"What Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die," the opinion said.

Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus disagreed in a dissent.

The 11th Circuit isn't the first appeals court to weigh in on the issue. The federal appeals court in Cincinnati upheld the government's new requirement that most Americans buy health insurance, and an appeals court in Richmond has heard similar legal constitutional challenges to the law.

But the Atlanta-based court is considered by many observers to be the most pivotal legal battleground yet because it reviewed a sweeping ruling by a Florida judge.

U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson's ruling not only struck down a requirement that nearly all Americans carry health insurance, but he also threw out other provisions ranging from Medicare discounts for some seniors to a change that allows adult children up to age 26 to remain on their parents' coverage.

The states urged the 11th Circuit to uphold Vinson's ruling, saying in a court filing that letting the law stand would set a troubling precedent that "would imperil individual liberty, render Congress's other enumerated powers superfluous, and allow Congress to usurp the general police power reserved to the states."

The Justice Department countered that Congress had the power to require most people to buy health insurance or face tax penalties because Congress has the authority to regulate interstate business. It said the legislative branch was exercising its "quintessential" rights when it adopted the new law.

During oral arguments in June, the three-judge panel repeatedly raised questions about the overhaul and expressed unease with the insurance requirement. Each of the three worried aloud if upholding the landmark law could open the door to Congress adopting other sweeping economic mandates.

The arguments unfolded in what's considered one of the nation's most conservative appeals courts. But the randomly selected panel represents different judicial perspectives. None of the three is considered either a stalwart conservative or an unfaltering liberal.

Dubina, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, is not considered to be as reflexively conservative as some of his colleagues. But he's been under particular scrutiny because of his daughter's outspoken opposition to the health care overhaul. U.S. Rep. Martha Dubina Roby, a Montgomery, Ala., Republican elected in November, voted to repeal the health care law.

Marcus and Hull were both tapped by President Bill Clinton to join the court. But Marcus was also previously appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan to serve on the Florida bench after several years as Miami's lead federal prosecutor. And Hull, a former county judge in Atlanta, is known for subjecting both sides of the counsel table to challenging questions.

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

6
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
rolando said...

Well, they just made my day. Thanks, 11th Circuit.

Sounds like a fairly well balanced panel.

August 12, 2011 at 3:26 p.m.
grandmastaj said...

"Fairly well-balanced" to the most raving conservative here. Being appointed by Bush and Saint Reagan makes them really impartial.

August 12, 2011 at 5:08 p.m.
amnestiUSAF84 said...

Hopefully not all Americans suffer short term memory loss. If we recall, it was the Republicans who stipulated the penalty clause for Americans who did not carry health insurance. The was originally against it, but tried to compromise. As the Republicans stated including a penalty for the insured was the only way they'd consider supporting the law.

August 12, 2011 at 5:42 p.m.
dsgfdfg said...

Hello everybody,the good shopping place,the new season approaching, welcome to this site:

==== http://shopping01.org = Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 UGG BOOT $50 ??? Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12 New era cap $9 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18 We accept payment PYAPAL. Free Shopping. You must not miss it! Thank you! == http://shopping01.org ====

==== http://shopping01.org == == http://shopping01.org ===

August 12, 2011 at 11:14 p.m.
najones75 said...

No, amnestiUSA, if we actually recall anything, there were no republicans who supported Obamacare...fairly certain there were two Rinos up north that voted for it. Hell, looking at the polls, there was no public support for Obamacare....it got shoved down our throats! Remember, "we have to pass the bill for you to know what's in the bill".

Nonetheless, a completely bogus statement that you just made.

August 13, 2011 at 7:33 a.m.
brokentoe said...

No, najones75, amnesti is right. The Republicans were the ones who insisted that stipulation be placed in any healthcare reform before they would consider supporting it. Like everything the GOP touches, this was just another trap they set, and Obama took the bait.

August 13, 2011 at 9:28 a.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.