published Saturday, December 17th, 2011

Good decision north of the border

The U.S. Senate had the wisdom, in the late 1990s, not to ratify the anti-global-warming Kyoto Protocol treaty. In fact, by unanimous vote, senators refused even to consider ratification.

The treaty placed punishing, mandatory energy use restrictions on some nations while exempting heavily polluting countries such as India and Communist China from the same restrictions on emissions of "greenhouse gases."

The United States was roundly criticized by environmental activists as being "out of step" for our refusal to go along with the economy-crippling Kyoto Protocol.

But now, our neighbor to the north, Canada, is also apparently willing to be considered "out of step" by environmental extremists: Canada has announced that it is withdrawing from the Kyoto Protocol.

Canada's environment minister, Peter Kent, put in stark terms the harm that adhering to Kyoto would do to his nation: "To meet the targets under Kyoto for 2012 would be the equivalent of either removing every car, truck, ATV, tractor, ambulance, police car and vehicle of every kind from Canadian roads or closing down the entire farming and agriculture sector and cutting heat to every home, office, hospital, factory and building in Canada," he said.

In addition, Canada faced $14 billion in penalties if it did not meet the emissions targets laid out by Kyoto.

Canada also wants to reserve the right to develop its ample domestic oil supplies -- something that would be made difficult if not impossible by Kyoto.

The decision makes Canada the first nation officially to renounce Kyoto, though Japan and Russia have already said they will reject any new requirements the treaty might impose. It's entirely possible that more nations will pull back as well.

If they do, we can scarcely blame them.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

It was always about the money. Money for the U.N. (Useless Notion). Only a fool would think he could stop weather!

December 17, 2011 at 9:41 a.m.
nucanuck said...

The tar sands development and exspansion condemn Canada to the label of Heavy Polluter.

Again, money trumps morality.

December 17, 2011 at 2:15 p.m.
rolando said...

Nucanuck -- We can then safely say that you have given up driving your car[s], stopped heating your home[s], and no long eat any Canadian foods then, right?

You insist on being in accord with the Kyoto Accord, right?

Or is that only other people?

December 17, 2011 at 6:48 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.