We can understand why Democrats who voted for ObamaCare might not be eager to talk with their constituents about it. After all, one survey after another has shown ObamaCare is unpopular with the American people.
Most of the states, meanwhile, have taken the remarkable step of filing lawsuits to stop ObamaCare from being implemented.
And two federal judges properly have ruled ObamaCare is unconstitutional.
But at least one Democrat wants to forbid even the uttering of the term "ObamaCare" by members of Congress on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives!
Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz took offense when Republican Rep. Tom Graves, who represents the congressional district of Georgia that borders Tennessee's Hamilton County, called the law "ObamaCare" as he sensibly urged his colleagues to de-fund and repeal it.
Wasserman Schultz insisted of the term "ObamaCare": "It is meant as a disparaging reference to the president of the United States ... . It is clearly in violation of the House rules against that."
Not content to make that simply a matter of personal opinion, she sought to have the presiding chairman in the House declare any references to "ObamaCare" a violation of the rules of the House.
The chairman reasonably declined.
As for ObamaCare -- or whatever anyone may prefer to call it -- Graves pointed out that the law is doing so much to raise insurance premiums and reduce availability of medical coverage that the administration has had to issue hundreds of waivers to health plans and organizations.
The waivers have exempted more than 2 million people from ObamaCare -- so far.
Graves added: "Now think about that: saving two and a half million people from ObamaCare. Mr. Chairman, let's save the rest of America here today ... and zero out the payments to those ObamaCare bureaucrats."
That's a fine idea.
But unfortunately, ObamaCare socialized medicine may prevail -- at very high costs to the American people, and with no guarantee of better health results.
related articles »
Ever since Democrats passed ObamaCare, they have insisted that the law does not amount to a federal takeover of medical ...
There is enormous irony in the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision to consider a 26-state constitutional challenge to ObamaCare.
WASHINGTON — Savoring the unlikeliest of victories, Republicans called their triumph in a New York City congressional race a repudiation ...
Considering how often the American people were promised that ObamaCare would vastly improve medical care, doesn’t it seem odd that ...