published Friday, February 25th, 2011

Psst. No shutdown during a ‘government shutdown’

  • photo
    Trays of printed Social Security checks wait to be mailed from the U.S. Treasury's Financial Management services facility in Philadelphia. (AP File Photo/Bradley C Bower, File)

By ANDREW TAYLOR

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Social Security checks would still go out. Troops would remain at their posts. Furloughed federal workers probably would get paid, though not until later. And virtually every essential government agency, like the FBI, the Border Patrol and the Coast Guard, would remain open.

That’s the little-known truth about a government shutdown. The government doesn’t shut down.

And it won’t on March 5, even if the combatants on Capitol Hill can’t resolve enough differences to pass a stopgap spending bill to fund the government while they hash out legislation to cover the last seven months of the budget year.

Fewer than half of the 2.1 million federal workers subject to a shutdown would be forced off the job if the Obama administration followed the path taken by presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. And that’s not counting 600,000 Postal Service employees or 1.6 million uniformed military personnel exempt from a shutdown.

So we’re talking fewer than one in four federal workers staying at home. Many federal workers get paid on March 4, so it would take a two-week shutdown for them to see a delay in their paychecks.

The rules for who works and who doesn’t date back to the early 1980s and haven’t been significantly modified since. The Obama administration hasn’t issued new guidance.

The air traffic control system, food inspection, Medicare, veterans’ health care and many other essential government programs would run as usual. The Social Security Administration would not only send out benefits but would continue to take applications. The Postal Service, which is self-funded, would keep delivering the mail. Federal courts would remain open.

The cherry blossoms in Washington would bloom as usual, and visitors to the city would be able to park and see them in all their glory around the Tidal Basin.

But they wouldn’t be able to take the elevator up the Washington Monument, visit museums along the National Mall or take a White House tour. National parks would be closed to visitors, a loss often emphasized in shutdown discussions.

The Capitol would remain open, however. Congress is deemed essential, despite its abysmal poll ratings.

The IRS wouldn’t answer its taxpayer hotline — at the height of tax-filing season. Under IRS precedents, the agency would process tax returns that contain payments. But people getting refunds would have to wait.

All sides say they don’t want a so-called shutdown like the two separate partial government closings in 1995-1996, when President Clinton and a then-new GOP majority in Congress were at loggerheads over the budget. Republicans took most of the political blame, and the episodes gave Clinton critical momentum on his way to re-election.

There haven’t been any shutdowns since then. The politics stink.

But from a practical perspective, shutdowns usually aren’t that big a deal. They happened every year when Jimmy Carter was president, averaging 11 days each. During President Reagan’s two terms, there were six shutdowns, typically of just one or two days apiece. Deals got cut. Everybody moved on.

In 1995-96, however, shutdowns morphed into political warfare, to the dismay of Republicans who thought they could use them to drag Clinton to the negotiating table on a balanced budget plan.

Republicans took a big political hit, but a compendium of the other hardships experienced reads like a roster of relatively minor inconveniences for most Americans: closed parks, delays in processing passport applications, 2,400 workers cleaning up toxic waste sites being sent home, and a short delay in processing veterans’ claims. A new government standard for lights and lamps was delayed.

To be sure, furloughs can be a major hardship for federal workers. Even those in essential jobs — and required to work — could see their paychecks delayed if a stalemate dragged on.

Lawmakers, however, typically provide back pay, even for employees who weren’t required to work. A repeat of that could raise hackles with some in the tea party-backed House GOP freshman class. A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, wouldn’t address whether furloughed federal workers would receive back pay if there is a shutdown this time.

Under a precedent-setting memorandum by Reagan budget chief David Stockman, federal workers are exempted from furloughs if their jobs are national security-related or if they perform essential activities that “protect life and property.”

In 1995, that meant 571,000 Defense Department civilian employees, some 69 percent, remained at post, while 258,000 other Pentagon workers were furloughed. Eighty-five percent of Veterans Administration employees went to work as did 70 percent of Transportation Department workers.

But just a handful of Environmental Protection Agency employees and only 7 percent of NASA workers were on the job, according to Clinton administration data.

This year, NASA would face widespread furloughs that suggest a shutdown could interrupt preparation for space shuttle flights this spring — though the “life and property” rules would almost certainly be invoked so that the Space Shuttle Discovery could land as scheduled on March 7. It’s slated to take off Thursday.

Just 4 percent of employees at the Department of Housing and Urban Development went to work in the 1995 shutdown, as did 11 percent of Department of Education employees. The National Archives shut down completely, as did the tiny Selective Service System.

Then there’s Social Security. Current beneficiaries need not worry; their payments wouldn’t be affected. And given the most recent precedent from the Clinton administration, those eligible to apply for benefits would be able to do so.

During the first shutdown in 1995, the Social Security Administration initially furloughed 93 percent of its workers and stopped enrolling new beneficiaries. But it reversed course in the second shutdown and kept 50,000 additional workers on the job.

If the federal government is shut down for several days, the Census Bureau could miss its April 1 legal deadline to provide 2010 redistricting data to the states. The bureau is currently in the midst of checking its population tallies, which are broken down by race and ethnicity down to the neighborhood level, for many states.

By the March 4 deadline, the bureau expects it will have distributed the data to about roughly half the states, with big states such as California, New York and Florida potentially left hanging if the government closes down.

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

3
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
GeorgiaRebel said...

Shut it down and don't bring it back. Government should not be performing non-essential services.

February 25, 2011 at 10:51 a.m.
jpo3136 said...

During the shutdown in 1995 and 1996, my G.I. Bill was stopped by Representative Gingrich's and the Republican Congress' irresponsible actions. They continually tried to blame President Clinton for failing to comply with their list of demands they titled, "The Contract with America." As they bickered about this, they ignored their obligations to many enlisted veteran's contracts. As a Desert Storm veteran, I found this event to be a morally selective interpretation of the United States' obligation to its enlisted Soldiers.

While it may be seen as an easy victory now, incountry it was hard labor and what looked like a death sentence for us all. Back then, before battle, I was directly told that I would only ". . . leave the battlefield dead or victorious." The United States insisted that the war had to be fought.

Then, when it was time to pay simple benefits, well within their means, Congress refused. They shutdown the government out of arbitrary bickering. That shutdown, combined with a car accident I had, set back my college education for several years.

I survived and eventually graduated, but only after raising again the money it takes to start up the education reimbursement process. There is no compensation or recourse for veterans who may lose critical progress in reimbursement education programs. At one point, I even complained to our local US Attorney's office, asking for help at having been victimized; the US Attorney listened for a moment and then refused to do anything. Many veterans have families and loans beyond their immediate G.I. Bills; for them the consequences are greater yet.

In the meanwhile, I crept by on a paycheck that was within a dollar of minimum wage. I do not feel that these shutdowns are without consequences. I wholeheartedly disagree with the tone of the article above. To this day, I remain bitter at the memory of the selfish conduct of our legislators, particularly the Republicans who so often tout patriotism while underfunding our wartime endeavors.

Throughout it all, and looking back now, I soon wonder just how harshly these shutdowns must affect so many other Americans who need government assistance to survive at all. Considering the selfishness displayed last time, I put little faith in reassurances that government shutdowns cause only cosmetic inconveniences. If the 1995 shutdown, which some people regard as only lasting a few weeks, affected me for several years, then what would another one do? What does this kind of poor conduct do to our old, our sick, our widowed, our handicapped? What does this do to people who need every bit of help they can get just to survive?

These shutdowns do have significant consequences. They directly affect many people for a long time. I know the last one did me.

February 25, 2011 at 10:21 p.m.
jaclynp said...

The fact that anyone can so cavilarily say that this is "no big deal" completely sickens me. Sure, on the whole this won't affect most Americans as much more than an inconvience, but for the federal employees this will affect, it is VERY BIG DEAL!!! My husband is a full time National Guard technician, which though he wears his uniform to work everyday is actually a federal job. We have recieved emails saying that this could cause us to go with pay for 22-30 days! Add to that the time it will take to recieve a paycheck if he does get back to work after that time frame, we could be looking at close to 2 months before we see a paycheck!!! We have been playing catch up as it is, having just had to sink our savings into putting a new engine into one of our vechicles and now somehow we and our 3 children are supposed to suddenly survive almost 2 months without pay??? Oh and we've been told there will be no backpay... so what we do fall behind on, we will be trying to catch up while trying to pay current bills! How does this sound like no big deal??? This sounds like people who are going to have utilities get cut off, people getting evicted for not paying rent, etc! Cause let's all keep in mind, that leave without pay does not qualify you to recieve unemployment benefits!!! My husband is a two time Iraq veteran, I feel so betrayed by our government that this is the thanks he gets for risking his life to go to Iraq and do what they asked of him!!!

February 26, 2011 at 12:15 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.