published Saturday, February 26th, 2011

Industry tried to get documentary disqualified from Oscars


Associated Press

ALLENTOWN, Pa. — The natural gas industry has spent months attacking the documentary “Gasland” as a deeply flawed piece of propaganda. After it was nominated for an Oscar, an industry-sponsored PR group asked the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences to reconsider the film’s eligibility.

The reply: Let Oscar voters have their say.

“We do not have the resources to vet each claim or implication in the many (documentary) films that compete for our awards each year, and even if we did there would be no shortage of people disputing our conclusions,” Bruce Davis, the academy’s executive director, wrote in a reply obtained by The Associated Press.

“Gasland” is up for best documentary at Sunday’s Academy Awards ceremony. Director Josh Fox’s dark portrayal of greedy energy companies, sickened homeowners and oblivious regulators has stirred heated debate among the various stakeholders in a natural gas boom that is sweeping parts of the U.S. The film has galvanized anti-drilling activists while drawing complaints about its accuracy and objectivity.

In a letter to the academy, Lee Fuller, the executive director of an industry-sponsored group named Energy In Depth, called “Gasland” an “expression of stylized fiction” with “errors, inconsistencies and outright falsehoods.”

He asked the academy to consider “remedial actions” against the film.

Davis, the executive director, wrote to Fuller that if the academy were to act on every complaint made about a nominated film, “it would not be possible even to have a documentary category.” He said the academy must “trust the intelligence of our members” to sort out fact from fiction.

“If facts have been suppressed or distorted, if truth has been twisted, we depend on them to sniff that out and vote accordingly,” he wrote.

The letter was given to the AP by Energy in Depth, whose spokesman, Chris Tucker, said the group had no expectation that “Gasland” would actually be disqualified from Oscar consideration. The point, he said, was to educate academy voters.

“I think it’s a fairly good bet that a large majority of the folks who are going to be voting on this film don’t have a background in petroleum engineering,” quipped Tucker, who put together a 4,000-word rebuttal of “Gasland” last summer.

Fox said the industry’s campaign against “Gasland” has backfired.

“What they’re doing is calling more attention to the film, so I think it works against them,” the director said from Los Angeles. “But I think it shows how aggressive they are, how bullying they are, and how willing they are to lie to promote the falsehood that it’s OK to live in a gas drilling area.”

The documentary category is no stranger to controversy. Michael Moore films like “Bowling for Columbine” and “Sicko,” as well as Al Gore’s 2006 global-warming tale, “An Inconvenient Truth,” have likewise been attacked as biased and inaccurate.

Like Moore, Fox defends his film as accurate. But he rejects comparisons to the bombastic, ideological director.

“What they’re trying to do is make (’Gasland’) look like a liberal, elite, Michael Moore thing, which of course it isn’t. It’s bipartisan,” he said.

Fox, a 38-year-old New York City theater director, took an interest in drilling after a gas company approached him in 2008 about leasing his family’s wooded 20-acre spread in Milanville, near the Delaware River in northeastern Pennsylvania, where he has lived off-and-on since childhood.

Camera in hand, he went on a cross-country tour of places where large-scale drilling is already under way, interviewing residents who say they were sickened by nearby drilling operations and aiming his lens at diseased livestock and flammable tap water that he also blames on gas industry malfeasance.

Though it had a tiny theatrical run, Fox has taken “Gasland” on the road for screenings in more than 100 towns and cities throughout the U.S., England and Australia. It has also aired on HBO.

“The point was to get the film to the people who needed it most, who were in the middle of making these decisions” on whether to lease their land for drilling, Fox said.

Fox isn’t the only Oscar nominee critical of natural gas drilling. Mark Ruffalo, who was nominated for the supporting actor award for “The Kids Are All Right,” lives in upstate New York, where there’s a fierce debate over gas extraction, and has emerged as a high-profile anti-drilling activist.

Energy In Depth’s Tucker said he plans to watch Sunday’s Academy Awards telecast, but doesn’t think the award ceremony will be the end of the discussion.

“If it wins the Oscar, the conversation continues on,” Tucker said. “If it doesn’t win the Oscar, the conversation continues on.”

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
aryfrosty said...

These "documentaries" would have a lot more weight if they proposed viable alternatives to the subject of their derision. They never do. They happily compare their "persecution" to Al Gore's when he made his docudrama without acknowledging that Al's fictitious work has been debunked over and again. Just as theirs will be. Get a life you 21st century hippies. This planet doesn;t exist just for you. As if anyone else wants to live like you with extreme B.O. and hairy-legged women.

February 27, 2011 at 1:51 a.m.
dude_abides said...

well sayed ary them sumsa beeches aint got no kinda clue whats goin on on this here world. just cause they have all they"re teeth and dont romance there children, they think they can push there science on us. all a man needs is his farmers almanac and a flag on the porch. and if a gas line blows up under a nayborhood, like in LA, maybe thats God tellin em to live differnt.

February 27, 2011 at 8:03 a.m.
hotdiggity said...

Aryfrosty you say "These "documentaries" would have a lot more weight if they proposed viable alternatives to the subject of their derision."

“Bowling for Columbine”, “Sicko,” and “An Inconvenient Truth,” all offered "viable alternatives". Did you even bother to watch the films?

As for "Gasland", if what the film infers is true, do you need a roadmap to understand what "viable alternatives" should be taken to prevent exposing people to poisons?

Perhaps you are familiar with the film "Erin Brockovich", based on a true story? She was a lowly legal clerk, not a "21st century hippie". Yet she exposed the fact that people were dying from tainted groundwater from irresponsible behavior of a gas company.

If you found out your drinking water was poisoned by a corporation would you really care who took the time to find this information, even if it was "21st century hippies"?

February 27, 2011 at 9:39 a.m.
msdebra said...

Just google Marcellus Shale to see what the prople in Pennsylvania are dealing with. Not pretty.

February 27, 2011 at 1:25 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.