published Sunday, July 17th, 2011

Atlanta schools created culture of cheating on tests, fear

Students at Emma Hutchinson School in Atlanta leave after the day's classes in this file photo. Hutchinson has been identified as one of 44 schools involved in a test cheating scandal. Investigators said nearly half the city’s schools allowed cheating to go unchecked for as long as a decade, beginning in 2001.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore, File)
Students at Emma Hutchinson School in Atlanta leave after the day's classes in this file photo. Hutchinson has been identified as one of 44 schools involved in a test cheating scandal. Investigators said nearly half the city’s schools allowed cheating to go unchecked for as long as a decade, beginning in 2001. (AP Photo/John Bazemore, File)

ATLANTA — Teachers spent nights huddled in a back room, erasing wrong answers on students’ test sheets and filling in the correct bubbles. At another school, struggling students were seated next to higher-performing classmates so they could copy answers.

Those and other confessions are contained in a new state report that reveals how far some Atlanta public schools went to raise test scores in the nation’s largest-ever cheating scandal. Investigators concluded that nearly half the city’s schools allowed the cheating to go unchecked for as long as a decade, beginning in 2001.

Administrators — pressured to maintain high scores under the federal No Child Left Behind law — punished or fired those who reported anything amiss and created a culture of “fear, intimidation and retaliation,” according to the report released earlier this month, two years after officials noticed a suspicious spike in some scores.

The report names 178 teachers and principals, and 82 of those confessed. Tens of thousands of children at the 44 schools, most in the city’s poorest neighborhoods, were allowed to advance to higher grades, even though they didn’t know basic concepts.

One teacher told investigators the district was “run like the mob.”

“Everybody was in fear,” another teacher said in the report. “It is not that the teachers are bad people and want to do it. It is that they are scared.”

For teachers and their bosses, the stakes were high: Schools that perform poorly and fail to meet certain benchmarks under the federal law can face sharp sanctions. They may be forced to offer extra tutoring, allow parents to transfer children to better schools, or fire teachers and administrators who don’t pass muster.

Experts say the cheating scandal — which involved more schools and teachers than any other in U.S. history — has led to soul-searching among other urban districts facing cheating investigations and those that have seen a rapid rise in test scores.

In Georgia, teachers complained to investigators that some students arrived at middle school reading at a first-grade level. But, they said, principals insisted those students had to pass their standardized tests. Teachers were either ordered to cheat or pressured by administrators until they felt they had no choice, authorities said.

One principal forced a teacher to crawl under a desk during a faculty meeting because her test scores were low. Another principal told teachers that “Walmart is hiring” and “the door swings both ways,” the report said.

Another principal told a teacher on her first day that the school did whatever was necessary to meet testing benchmarks, even if that meant “breaking the rules.”

Teachers from the investigation contacted by The Associated Press did not return calls or declined to comment.

Educators named in the investigation could face criminal charges ranging from tampering with state documents to lying to investigators. And many could lose their teaching licenses.

Parents of children enrolled at the 44 schools say they are frustrated and angry.

Shawnna Hayes-Tavares said her son’s test scores dropped dramatically after he transferred out of Slater Elementary. She said a testing coordinator at the new school told her the test scores could have been inflated.

The possibility that there could have been cheating “gives me and him a false sense of security as to where he is,” she said.

Uncertainty about her son’s progress “has not afforded us the opportunity to do more remediation in those areas of weakness,” Hayes-Tavares said. “It robbed us of those opportunities. We’re going to try to play catch up now.”

At Slater, investigators found multiple teachers changed answers on tests or allowed students to look up answers to questions. Teachers would gather in the school’s media center to change wrong answers with the blessing of administrators, investigators said.

For Renee Columbus, whose 4-year-old son is starting pre-kindergarten at one of the schools in the state investigation, news of the cheating probe was disheartening.

“Right now it’s our only option,” said Columbus, who lives in south Atlanta. “I’m hoping by the time he gets into kindergarten, we’ll be in a different school district.”

The fallout from the state report has only begun.

So far, at least four of the district’s top administrators and two principals have been removed and put on paid leave. The head of the district’s human resources department resigned after investigators said she destroyed documents and tried to cover up the extent of the cheating.

The schools could owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal funding they received for good test performance — money that would be lost at a time when the state’s education budget already has been slashed by millions. Districts are being forced to lay off or furlough teachers and cut programs to make ends meet.

And at least one member of the Atlanta school board wants to reclaim tens of thousands of dollars in bonus money that former Superintendent Beverly Hall received for the high test scores.

Investigators said Hall, who retired just days before the investigation was made public, dismissed those who complained about cheating as naysayers trying to discredit the district’s progress. The investigators said she either knew or should have known about the cheating.

“Dr. Hall and her senior cabinet accepted accolades when those below them performed well, but they wanted none of the burdens of failure,” investigators wrote.

Hall’s attorney has denied the allegations, and Hall has said she did not know about cheating in the district.

She apologized in a statement last week for “any shortcomings” that might have led to the widespread cheating.

“To the extent that I failed to take measures that would have prevented what the investigators have disclosed, I am accountable, as head of the school system, for failing to act accordingly,” Hall wrote. “If I did anything that gave teachers the impression that I was unapproachable and unresponsive to their concerns, I also apologize for that.”

The testing problems first came to light after The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that some scores were statistically improbable. The state released audits of test results after the newspaper published its analysis.

Experts say the Atlanta cheating scandal has become the new rallying cry for education advocates and parents in other urban districts like Philadelphia, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., where cheating investigations are ongoing.

Bob Schaeffer of the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, which works to end abuses in standardized testing and wants changes made to the federal No Child Left Behind law, said many are wondering where the “next Atlanta” will be.

“Because of Atlanta, the media and policymakers are going back and looking at concerns raised about their states,” Schaeffer said. “This is the top issue. When you see a story like this and see the incredible impact of the confessions, you start to look and say, ‘Hey, is there something comparable going on here?’”

about Associated Press...

The Associated Press

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
amnestiUSAF84 said...

How Government Tests Pressure Schools To Cheat:

excerpt from NewsOne:

Of course, it was the teachers who made the ultimate decision to cheat, which is immoral and unethical. But it was the laws and tests that pressured them to make those unethical and immoral decisions. Just like a man who is poor and can’t feed his family is more likely to steal than a rich man, a teacher who fears that his job may get cut, his school may get shut down or he won’t get a raise, is more likely to cheat on a test than one who isn’t.

Government mandated tests reduce students to numbers on a piece of paper, and not human beings. Teachers and schools are graded, not on how they teach, but on how well their students perform on tests. Many government mandated tests set unrealistic standards for students, some not allowing students to graduate if they don’t pass them. This only helps to increase the drop out rates and pressures both students and teachers to cheat on tests.

They also force teachers to teach to the tests, rather than to teach using their own strengths and backgrounds, making teaching and learning more of a chore for both students and teachers. Rather than teaching students to become future productive members of society and free thinkers, teachers teach students to be capable test takers.


This is not to say that schools helping the students to cheat is a new thing, as there's been schools in prior years caught doing similar things, or committed only by some schools in Atlanta, but the NCLB government rules may have made cheating more widespread and inevitable.

July 17, 2011 at 1:05 p.m.
sojoiner said...

any wonder why.

July 17, 2011 at 5:35 p.m.
Selah said...

I disagree that a poor man is more likely to steal than a rich man and a teacher who fears his/her job may be cut will cheat...

They may be the ones more likely to get caught...but the rich steal daily but less emphasis is put on them b/c it is covered up or quieted down. In a class at UTC the professor explained that more arrests happen with petty crimes in low income communities statistically but those who are in high ranking positions and embazzle money daily cost TAXPayers more financially but escape persecution. What is up with that?

July 17, 2011 at 9:04 p.m.
Selah said...

Oh, ya...Thanks George Bush

July 17, 2011 at 9:06 p.m.
amnestiUSAF84 said...

Atually, Selah, I agre with you. In that the wealthy steals all the time, but are rarely held criminally accountable as the poor are.

I think the article's intent was to say that if you threaten to take away a person's most basic means to survive and provide for his family that person will attempt to survive by any means necessary. Even stealing.

With the government's NCLB rules, it was predictable that either one, two or three things would happen. 1. Cheat(which has happened). 2. The stress would reduce teachers to physically, emotionally and psychologically abusing students. 3. Both.

Actually, the Atlanta school system isn't the only one that's gotten caught up in cheating. Long before the Atlanta school scandal there was a school in another state{northeast, I think} a few years back where there was a backlog of parents trying to get their children registered, it was deemed so successful. That school too was exposed for cheating.

July 17, 2011 at 10:21 p.m.
McRand said...

I know how to fix it. Prozac for the teachers and Ritalin for the kids.

Okay, we got that solved, what's next?

July 18, 2011 at 12:10 a.m.
joetheplumber said...

Thats the only way these kids are goin to pass. What difference does it make. 99% of them wll get their checks from the government beit walfare or a social service job. They will be entitled to somethng to meet a quota.

August 20, 2011 at 6:42 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.