published Monday, June 20th, 2011

Europe’s protector

In the decades after World War II, the free nations of Western Europe faced a serious threat of aggression by the Communist Soviet Union. So it made sense from a U.S. national security standpoint for our country to help European nations defend themselves.

But with the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the need for the United States to play such an active role in Europe’s defense obviously decreased.

Yet we continue to shoulder much of the financial burden of Europe’s defense, and U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates pointed that out in a recent speech in Belgium. He said that several nations are “apparently willing and eager for American taxpayers to assume the growing security burden left by reductions in European defense budgets.”

In fact, U.S. taxpayers are on the hook for about three-fourths of the spending by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization — a military alliance that includes much of Europe — and our nation provides most of the weapons and other equipment used in NATO operations. We have footed that bill while European nations have been unsustainably expanding their social welfare programs and relying on us for protection.

Gates rightly says that has to stop.

“The blunt reality is that there will be dwindling appetite and patience in the U.S. Congress, and in the American body politic writ large, to expend increasingly precious funds on behalf of nations that are apparently unwilling to devote the necessary resources ... to be serious and capable partners in their own defense,” he said.

He pointed out that in the current international military action against Libya — a place where the United States has far less direct interest than European countries have — our nation is carrying too much of the burden. It is wrong, he added, for the United States to play such a big role in combat missions for countries that “don’t want to share the risks and the costs.”

That is a hard truth for some of our allies across the Atlantic to hear — but it is important that they hear it.

5
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
nucanuck said...

The US keeps military garrisons around the world for our own reasons, more so than protecting others. The US military industrial complex is a huge organism that needs vast amounts of tax dollars to remain viable. As we come to grips with downsizing what we cannot afford nor justify, tens of thousands of jobs and millions in profits will be lost.

The paradox is that we have to destroy a large chunk of the US economy to make it stronger for the long teem.

June 20, 2011 at 10:34 a.m.
Livn4life said...

Nucanuck, I have no idea what your statement has to do with what was in this opinion article. Oh I get it one more chance for you to voice an anti-military voice and later include how we need to unsustainably expand our social welfare programs leaving no one to protect us. I get it, boy do I get it!

June 20, 2011 at 11:52 a.m.
nucanuck said...

L4F,

If you think US worldwide military garrisons are good for the US or the world, you may want to review the basis for that thought.

June 20, 2011 at 12:11 p.m.
nucanuck said...

L4F,

Do you think America is the lone country that cannot/should not defend itself from within our own borders? What country do you think might ever attack/invade the US and to what purpose?

The battleground is economic and the US military is actually undemining US economic viability. If you disagree, please explain.

June 20, 2011 at 12:29 p.m.
nucanuck said...

Should've been L4l,

Did you hit and run or are thiking about a response?

June 20, 2011 at 3:36 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.