published Saturday, March 19th, 2011

Pressure rises to ‘E-verify’ new hires

What is E-verify?

E-verify is an Internet-based system that compares information from an employee’s Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, to data from U.S Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration records to confirm employment eligibility.

Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Georgia and Tennessee could soon join four other states that require employers to use a federal verification system for new employees.

Legislation has been introduced in both states to require most employers to use the government’s E-verify system to validate the citizenship or residency status of new hires.

Such proposals have received mixed reactions from employer and worker groups.

Only Arizona, Mississippi South Carolina and Utah have E-verify mandates for all employers.

E-verify is an Internet-based system that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States.

State requirements disputed

Arizona’s law is the subject of a federal lawsuit before the U.S. Supreme Court and a 2010 federal appeals court ruling overturned an Oklahoma requirement that all employers use the system.

Georgia already requires the use of E-verify for public agencies and public contracts, but Tennessee doesn’t.

E-verify, which started as a pilot program in the late 1990s, has already grown in use throughout Tennessee and Georgia. Nationwide, the number of employers regularly using E-verify grew from 1,064 in 2001 to almost 217,000 in 2010.

Use in Tennessee grows

In Tennessee and Georgia, the growth has been just as significant.

From 2006 to March 5, 2011, the number of employers signed up to use the system increased from 653 to 22,776 in Tennessee.

In Georgia, it increased from 922 employers in 2006 to 46,109 as of March 5, 2011, according to data provided by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Debating effectiveness

While the system usually can confirm whether or not a name and Social Security or alien identification number exist in a federal database, it cannot confirm whether a name and identifying number actually belong to the worker being hired, the Migration Policy Institute said.

As a government contractor, Shaw Industries Group Inc. in Dalton, Ga. has used the system since 2007 and hasn’t had any problems with it, Paul Richard, vice president of human resources, said in an e-mail.

But for smaller businesses the system can be more burdensome, said Brian Anderson, president and CEO of the Dalton-Whitfield Chamber of Commerce.

“Is it overbearing where it can’t be done? No, but it’s another cost whether you consider time or money to small businesses,” he said.

Small fry unprepared

The Chattanooga Area Chamber of Commerce is not opposed to such legislation as long as it applies equally to both public and private employers, Chamber spokesman J.Ed. Marston said.

Dan Haskell, executive director of the Tennessee Jobs Coalition, an umbrella group of employer associations, said officials have not seen a bill they can support.

“In the states where it has been mandated elsewhere they are only getting about 25 percent compliance,” he said. “Many smaller businesses are just not prepared for this kind of effort.”

Haskell said 10 percent of Tennessee’s 200,000 businesses don’t even have computers and for those businesses “compliance would be almost impossible,” he added.

Bill’s provisions cited

But Tennessee state Rep. Joe Carr, R-Larcassas, who introduced the Tennessee Lawful Employment Act, said businesses will have many opportunities to comply with the law before they get penalized. Those who don’t have a computer, a third party can help them, he said.

Among those employees screened by E-verify, more than 98 percent are automatically confirmed as authorized to work in the United States. Only 1.7 percent of those screened by E-verify receive initial system mismatches. Such mismatches may be due to an applicant’s being in the country illegally, but not always.

Tamar Jacoby, president of ImmigrationWorks USA, a national federation of small business owners that works to improve border control laws, said the problem is no longer whether E-verify is accurate, but whether the nation needs a legal path for the hiring of immigrant workers.

“Send an illegal immigrant home and create a job for an American sounds like a good idea, but that’s not how it typically works because if that immigrant goes home probably what’s going to happen is that the very low-end job is not going to be filled by an American and the better paying job is going to get eliminated,” she said.

about Perla Trevizo...

Perla Trevizo joined the Chattanooga Times Free Press in 2007 and covers immigration/diversity issues and higher education. She holds a master’s degree in newswire journalism from Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid, Spain, and a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Texas. In 2011 she participated in the Bringing Home the World international reporting fellowship program sponsored by the International Center for Journalists, producing a series on Guatemalan immigrants for which she ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
generalno said...

Only illegal aliens and their support organizations are opposed to the E-Verify system. It's not perfect but it's 97% effective. It's also the best tool we have and will be until we can afford bio-metric identification of these scofflaws. Even when illegal aliens are collared, 80% are set free to re-offend. Support this system if you value American sovereignty.

March 19, 2011 at 10:28 a.m.
alohaboy said...

Sounds like small business and the Chambers don't like it but they also oppose taxes for the Government to do more and oppose controls on hiring the worker who will take the lowest pay, legal or illegal doesn't matter.

March 19, 2011 at 10:55 p.m.
Wilder said...

The common denominator for the sources quoted in this piece, is a pronounced advocacy for illegal immigration, as illustrated by the quote from ImmigrationWorks USA:

"Send an illegal immigrant home and create a job for an American sounds like a good idea, but that’s not how it typically works because if that immigrant goes home probably what’s going to happen is that the very low-end job is not going to be filled by an American and the better paying job is going to get eliminated...”

A balanced article would have included quotes from groups representing the opposing point of view:

"...a number of politically influential business lobbying organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Restaurant Association, and the National Association of Home Builders have all endorsed legalization and increased future immigration. It is important to note that the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), which is by far the largest organization representing small businesses, has not endorsed this position and, in fact, endorsed legislation that would have increased immigration enforcement efforts." The Heritage Foundation

This article belongs on the opinion page, not the business section.

March 20, 2011 at 1:13 a.m.
generalno said...

The Chamber, the Restaurant Association and the Home Builders are opposed because they want cheap labor now. I'd remind those interested in the long term that if cheap labor is legalized, it won't be cheap any more. Because restaurant and construction jobs cannot be exported, these organizations will clamor for more cheap labor. Does anyone believe they give a damn about doubling the unemployment? About the tax money required to double the welfare population? About lowering the American standard of living? E-Verify stops much of this nonsense.

March 20, 2011 at 10:10 a.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.