published Monday, March 28th, 2011

Cook: Abolishing a system that kills more than prisoners

Tennessee's Death Penalty: Costs & Consequences
Tennessee's Death Penalty: Costs & Consequences

If Tennessee abolished the death penalty, it could save millions of dollars a year.

“I think it would be a wonderful idea,” said Mary Ann Green, assistant public defender in Chattanooga.

“You could save the money and spend it on areas that would be so much more effective and greater a deterrent, like drug and alcohol treatment, early parenting skills, mental health services and so many other things,” she said.

Earlier this month, Gov. Bill Haslam proposed a budget that seeks to cut more than $133 million from services, many of which help our most vulnerable citizens.

The mentally ill and suicidal will lose nearly $1.6 million in services.

Programs that aid children, students and prekindergartners will be cut by more than $5 million.

The under- and uninsured will lose more than $40 million in TennCare funding.

Balanced budgets are vital. Overspending is destructive. Yet to balance the budget on the backs of the least of these without considering removing one cent from a death penalty system no longer practiced by two-thirds of all nations on earth is not only questionable, it is unethical.

“It outrages me that the death penalty is a nondebatable issue as compared to feeding children or foster care for needy children,” said David Raybin, a Nashville attorney who, while working in the state attorney general’s office in the 1970s, wrote Tennessee’s current death penalty statute.

Commentary On Comptroller's Report
Commentary On Comptroller's Report

“The death penalty is an expensive luxury,” he said. “It makes people feel better to have it. People believe so strongly it deters crime, which it doesn’t.”

According to Amnesty International, 18 countries carried out executions in 2009, with the vast majority occurring in five nations: China, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the United States.

Within the United States, a trend toward abolition continues to gain ground, as only 34 states currently main-

tain death rows. Many states — most recently Illinois — have realized the imperfections and failures of the death penalty system.

Since 1973, more than 130 people have been exonerated from death row prisons across the country. Sentenced to death for crimes they did not commit, these U.S. citizens — found innocent after retrials, DNA evidence or more comprehensive legal defense — are walking testimonies to the grave inadequacies of our capital punishment system.

“I think [the abolition of the death penalty] will happen in my lifetime,” said Green, “and I’m 66 years old.”

Other states — such as Kansas, Florida, North Carolina and Texas — have found that the death penalty system is costing millions more than sentencing the worst of the worst criminals to life without parole.

In California, the L.A. Times reported that taxpayers are funding a death penalty system that costs $114 million per year more than life-without-parole sentencing only.

This superlong due process includes years of extra litigation, police involvement, expert testimony, judge and jury time and sentencing. Then comes life on death row, with security far greater — and costlier — than a prison maintaining only life-without-parole prisoners.

Then there’s Tennessee’s Office of Post-Conviction Defender, a state-funded program that assists and defends death row inmates after they’ve lost their initial appeals. Its staff — nearly 20 attorneys and assistants — has nearly doubled in the last six years, as has its budget, currently about $2 million.

“If the state of Tennessee had no one on death row and no capital trials, then it would save millions of dollars a year,” wrote Duke University professor Philip Cook, responding to a 2004 study from the Tennessee Office of the Comptroller, which claimed that capital trials in Tennessee are substantially more expensive than noncapital ones.

Additionally, the comptroller’s study showed that district attorneys across the state are not consistent in their pursuit of the death sentence, and that the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals reversed nearly one-third of capital cases on appeal.

Currently 84 men and one woman sit on death row in Tennessee. The system that will one day execute them has been criticized as barbaric and inhumane.

So is a budget that can save lives but refuses to do so in order to kill others.

David Cook can be reached at blumail.org.

about David Cook...

David Cook is the award-winning city columnist for the Times Free Press, working in the same building where he began his post-college career as a sportswriter for the Chattanooga Free Press. Cook, who graduated from Red Bank High, holds a master's degree in Peace and Justice Studies from Prescott College and an English degree from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. For 12 years, he was a teacher at the middle, high school and university ...

2
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Stewwie said...

Logically, using the death penalty should be cheaper for taxpayers than funding the lifetime jail time for a capital offender. If this is currently not the case, as Mr. Cook states in his article, then I think that we should change things to where it would be.

I'm not a lawyer so I'm not familiar with what "extra litigation" has to take place when someone is found guilty. However, it seems to me that we could simplify the process for someone found guilty of a capital offense. Give them 90 days or so to appeal a guilty verdict (as allowed by law), or go ahead and schedule the execution. Any more delays is what unnecessarily causes taxpayers to pay more.

March 28, 2011 at 9:56 p.m.
holdout said...

As the systems is set up and runs now it is a financial burden and unfair to everyone involved. Appeals are made one at a time and acted on one at a time. 90 days to put together a packet of all reasons for the appeal and then a week for the judges to make a decision. The day after that there would either be an execution or not.

March 29, 2011 at 12:29 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.