published Saturday, May 7th, 2011

Judge ousts Mathews’ defense

  • Jesse Mathews in court
    Jesse Mathews, charged in the shooting death of Chattanooga police Sgt. Tim Chapin, stood in Judge Barry Steelman's courtroom Friday for an arraignment hearing.

Two private attorneys appointed to represent the man charged in the shooting death of a Chattanooga police sergeant will ask the court to seek a jury from outside Hamilton County for his trial.

“There’ll be a change of venue motion filed,” attorney Lee Davis said to reporters after the hearing for Jesse Ray Mathews, 25.

Davis and Bryan Hoss were named to defend Mathews after Criminal Court Judge Barry Steelman on Friday took the public defender’s office off the case.

Mathews is charged with killing Chattanooga police Sgt. Tim Chapin during a failed armed robbery April 2 at the U.S. Money Shops on Brainerd Road.

Mathews was indicted on one count of felony murder, one count of first-degree murder, three counts of attempted first-degree murder and one count of aggravated robbery on April 27. District Attorney Bill Cox has filed notice stating that he will ask for the death penalty if Mathews is convicted.

Steelman’s order surprised Mathews’ three public defenders — Karla Gothard, Jane Buffaloe and Mary Ann Green.

“We were fully expecting to be appointed, and the first notice we got that we weren’t being appointed was when the judge appointed Mr. Davis and Mr. Hoss,” Gothard said after the hearing.

Davis told reporters after the hearing Steelman called him and Hoss and asked them to accept an appointment on the case.

Steelman's Order
Steelman's Order

“Believe me, it’s not something we want to do but something this serious, this important — both Bryan and myself take anyone’s right to counsel extremely seriously,” Davis said.

He said the two will meet with Mathews at the jail and begin preparing the case. He expects scheduling and trial dates to be chosen by the next hearing.

Steelman scheduled the next court hearing date for Aug. 16.


Authorities say Mathews, who walked away from a halfway house in Colorado where he was serving time for a robbery conviction, planned the Brainerd Road pawnshop robbery.

Court documents state Mathews was wearing body armor and carrying two semiautomatic pistols. Documents state he fired at four police officers, killing Chapin in a close-range shootout, before being captured while trying to flee.

Police said Mathews was shot several times and had been listed in critical condition shortly after the incident. He was in a wheelchair, jaw wired shut and drainage tubes protruding from beneath his chin, for an April 13 preliminary hearing.

On Friday afternoon, Mathews shuffled into the half-filled courtroom. Wearing a red jail jumpsuit, his ankles shackled and wrists handcuffed to a chain around his waist, he sat in a row of padded chairs in front of the jury box.

Mathews spoke once, answering a question from Steelman.

“The first thing I have to do is determine if you have funds to pay for an attorney,” Steelman asked.

“I do not,” Mathews answered.

Members of his family — father Ray Vance Mathews, mother Kathleen Mathews, sister Rachel Mathews and her boyfriend James Poteete — face a July 5 trial in federal court on charges they aided Mathews before and after the shooting.


A seven-page order from Steelman details his reasoning for cutting the defender’s office out of the case.

Steelman cited concerns about the public defender’s caseload, Gothard’s health and previous trial performances by her and Green in death penalty cases.

In 1993 Leroy Hall Jr. was sentenced to die for convictions of first-degree murder and aggravated arson in the death of his ex-girlfriend, Traci Crozier, according to Times Free Press archives. Gothard represented Hall in the original case.

“In May of 2002 a hearing on Leroy Hall’s post-conviction petition was held,” Steelman wrote. “[Gothard] testified that neither she nor her co-counsel were effective in their representation of the defendant at trial.”

Steelman cited two other death penalty cases that he prosecuted as an assistant district attorney before being elected judge in 2006.

Marlon Duane Kiser was convicted and received the death penalty in November 2003 for killing Hamilton County Deputy Donald Bond. Gothard and Green represented Kiser.

According to Steelman’s order, Green “did not state at the time of the hearing that she believed the defendant was not competent” and Gothard “stated that she had no question about the defendant’s competency.”

After the verdict, Green filed a motion for a new trial on the grounds that “she had personal concerns regarding Kiser’s competency to waive mitigation.”

Gothard also represented Isaac Jones, who was convicted of second-degree murder in the killing of Chattanooga police officer Julie Jacks.

Jones petitioned for a new trial because, he said, he didn’t have the chance to testify on his own behalf, according to newspaper archives.

“You failed to satisfy yourself that he wished to waive his right to testify in the case. Is that what you’re saying?” Cox asked, according to the post-conviction hearing transcript excerpt in Steelman’s order.

“Pains me to say this, but yes,” Gothard replied in the transcript.


Reached by phone after the hearing, Hoss responded to questions about possible conflicts for him and Davis.

Each counts police officers among his clients, and Hoss also represents officers who are members of the Fraternal Order of Police and the Police Benevolent Association in disciplinary cases.

Davis confirmed he represented Chapin in a 2001 DUI case. The charge was reduced to reckless driving and Chapin was sentenced to six months of probation, which was suspended, Davis said.

“Lawyers frequently are required to put on different hats, and what our job is to do is represent the client in court at that time,” Hoss said. “We were hoping there was a conflict.”

Davis said he had checked with the Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility to ensure that neither had a conflict with representing Mathews.

Gothard said after the hearing she regretted that her office had not been notified in advance of the change.

“I really would have liked to be able to tell Jesse this,” Gothard. “I can’t even go explain it to him. He’s totally unaware, we were unaware, how’s he aware?”

about Todd South...

Todd South covers courts, poverty, technology, military and veterans for the Times Free Press. He has worked at the paper since 2008 and previously covered crime and safety in Southeast Tennessee and North Georgia. Todd’s hometown is Dodge City, Kan. He served five years in the U.S. Marine Corps and deployed to Iraq before returning to school for his journalism degree from the University of Georgia. Todd previously worked at the Anniston (Ala.) Star. Contact ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
xyzyra said...

Davis and Hoss are friends of police. If there's even a remote chance of the appearance of a conflict of interest their taking the case should not be allowed. One would think the first order would be to ask for a change of venue. The Public Defenders were playing this by the book and following the rules. Maybe that's why they were rejected.

May 7, 2011 at 8:59 a.m.
Legend said...

PR and indian. And the wishes of you two somehow makes us all better? If so, how?

May 7, 2011 at 3:43 p.m.
Johnnyhurst said...

Pr and Indian, I sure hope that your careers arent in any kind of public service, especially Law Enforcement. Sure this guy deserves to die if he is convicted, but does deserve a fair trial. If yall are law enforcement, please dont hold my opinion against me if you see me out one day. Hope Sgt Chapins family get the justice they deserve.

May 7, 2011 at 4:17 p.m.
rolando said...

"“Believe me, it’s not something we want to do but something this serious, this important — both Bryan and myself take anyone’s right to counsel extremely seriously,” Davis said." [Emphasis mine.]

Nice shot at the womenfolk, there Davis. Somehow, in your mind at least, men are better than women at defending "something this serious", huh? Some kinda "oopsie" slip of the old tongue there, I would interesting Freudian slip, no?"

Sure hope you are a bit more thoughtful and careful what you say while defending Mathews before a jury with -- oh, horrors!! -- women sitting.

Remind me to avoid you guys like the plague should I ever need a decent about bunglers.

May 7, 2011 at 4:33 p.m.

Many of us are feeling the emotions of this case since we lost a loved officer and his family is now without a husband and dad. Steelman may just have a point to consider. The public defenders messed up previously and maybe by appointing regular attorneys, there won't be much hope for mathews when the appeals start. To ask for a change in venue may also be a good move. Seems to me the judge is trying to avoid any conflicts down the road and we all know those are going to happen. They always do when the death sentence is imposed. Let's try to see the case for what it is. Ranting about anything at this point won't bring back Sergeant Chapin. It's time for justice to be served folks. I pray the system works.

May 7, 2011 at 8:33 p.m.
chadanoogie said...

I applaud Judge Steelman for doing his homework. Now it will be less likely that this guy will get off on a technicality. After reading the order, I don't know how these attorneys at the public defender's office are still allowed to practice law.

May 7, 2011 at 11:24 p.m.
stx said...

So, the public defenders messed up previously? As I recall the last death penalty case in Chattannoga was Michael McCormick. These public defenders got a not guilty verdict on that one. The one before that (defended by these public defenders and which Steelman helped prosecute) was the Julie Jacks case. The defendant did't get the death penalty in that one. In fact, he wasn't even found guilty of first degree murder. Seems more like a set-up to me and that the powers that be don't want Mathews to have a chance at slipping out of the death penalty at trial. Also, appointing attorneys who say, "Believe me, it’s not something we want to do" and who representeed the victim and other police in the past is a sure way to set up a technicality on a conflict of interest. Welcome to years of appeal on that one.

May 8, 2011 at 12:30 a.m.
Legend said...

stx I was thinking the very same thing. By appointing Hoss and Davis the conflict of interest has already been established long before the trial begins.

May 8, 2011 at 7:30 a.m.
Haiku said...

It doesn't matter who Mathews victim was. He still deserves his day in court, according to America's judicial system. It shouldn't make a difference who his victim is. Sgt. Chapin may or may not have been well liked, a good father and a host of other things. Who the victim was should have no bearings on how the accused should be tried. The system should still work regardless of who is who. The same if a person was wrongly and purposely killed by member of authority. To my knowledge, there's only been one case where a member of authority was charged with murder and might receive the death penalty for having wrongly killed a civilian citizen. That situation took place during the aftermaths of the Katrina tragedy on Danziger Bridge in New Orleans. The cop charged is a minority.

May 8, 2011 at 12:24 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.