published Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

The Scandal

Related story: Herman Cain team denies report of sexual harassment

about Clay Bennett...

The son of a career army officer, Bennett led a nomadic life, attending ten different schools before graduating in 1980 from the University of North Alabama with degrees in Art and History. After brief stints as a staff artist at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and the Fayetteville (NC) Times, he went on to serve as the editorial cartoonist for the St. Petersburg Times (1981-1994) and The Christian Science Monitor (1997-2007), before joining the staff of the ...

76
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
onetinsoldier said...

He even looks a little like Clarence. Just as ignorant too. Just who was Cains wife?

November 1, 2011 at 12:54 a.m.
NGAdad said...

This was soooo predictable, the denial and the 'skeletons in the closet.' Of course, the Republicans need not field a viable candidate, Mr. Obama already does whatever big money wants. Occupy a third party candidate's bid! Seriously, both the Rs and the Ds are sold out, and hopelessly entrenched in keeping their jobs instead of seeing to the nation's well-being.

November 1, 2011 at 12:55 a.m.
nucanuck said...

Having Cain leading the pack tells us something dubious about the quality of the rest. Politics has become such a bruising dirty business that our best people don't want to mud-wrestle. 2012 through 2016 is shaping up to be a continuation of weak leadership headed south.

Can the country hold together through an economic and structural collapse without good leadership? It looks like we are going to find out.

November 1, 2011 at 1:15 a.m.
onetinsoldier said...

Cains a molester and Perry's a drunk. Looks like the repugnants have to go with the guy that wears temple underware. Precious. Even a Black Socialist Muslim born in Kenya and raised on bananas could beat the current repugnant candidates.

If this is the best of the repugnant party, then anyone supporting them would struggle getting two digits on an IQ test.

November 1, 2011 at 1:22 a.m.
acerigger said...

Just more distraction,"look at the shiny object" as always from our CORPORATE MEDIA.

November 1, 2011 at 1:46 a.m.
EaTn said...

Cain didn't think he would rise far enough with right-wingers that anyone would look in his closet. Anybody care to guess who will soon "reconsider" coming down off her throne to save the ultra-conservatives from being stuck with Romney?

November 1, 2011 at 6:15 a.m.
MTJohn said...

Donald Trump should ask Herman Cain to release his birth certificate - make that the personnel records.

November 1, 2011 at 6:50 a.m.
woody said...

Did he do 'it'?? Would he he do 'it'?? It's all irrelevant.

We've already elected, then re-elected one president with a checkered past(?), concerning possible sexual indiscretions, not to mention at least one more(?) while in office. And while I am not saying I agree with such actions by anyone, let alone our "Commander-in-Chief", the country did not suffer any serious repercussions because of his 'less-than-presidential' behavior.

If you are going to fault Mr. Cain for something look back at all of his 'changes in positions' and 'policy clarifications'. You'd think this man was already a career politician, given his 'footwork' trying to keep from tripping over his own tongue.

Herman Cain wants to come off looking and sounding like our best friend and this country's personal savior..while all he seems to be able to do is to make all of the 'real' career politicians look better-by comparison.

And none of them 'look' or 'sound' any better than the man they are determined to replace..Woody

November 1, 2011 at 7:01 a.m.
dude_abides said...

"The only thing I may have been guilty of is paying someone a compliment." -Herman Cain

Nice rack? Nice ass? Baby, you got little Herman squirmin'?

November 1, 2011 at 7:07 a.m.
Pictureman said...

This is good - especially when you take out Cain's picture and insert Bill Clinton's!

November 1, 2011 at 7:24 a.m.
EaTn said...

Pictureman--except Bill Clinton wasn't an assistant pastor at a mega church and running for president as an ultra conservative.

November 1, 2011 at 7:30 a.m.
GreenKepi said...

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote, ‘To hint that a black man had committed a sex crime is to pronounce a death sentence. This was why I'd gone out of my way to avoid the very behavior of which I was now being accused.’

Thomas concluded, "I refused to bow down to the superior wisdom of the white liberals who thought they knew what was better for blacks; since I didn't know my place, I had to be put down." Now…it’s Mr. Cain’s turn….

So…to all you now ready to destroy Mr. Cain…please remember, as long as the black man is a democrat…he’s given a pass (but kept in ‘his place’). Remember, for example, Jesse Jackson’s affair? What about, Al Sharpton?

It wasn’t sexual; however, he got away with it…that William Jefferson’s freezing his money episode? No problem for them…was it?

November 1, 2011 at 8:16 a.m.
fairmon said...

People are quick to convict without the full story. Anyone familiar with the EEOC process knows all a woman has to do is make a charge with no obligation to prove anything. Many lawyers, regardless of the facts, are willing to take the chance a settlement giving them a third is likely. I am not endorsing Cain but people should be looking for a president that can lead not a new pastor for their church.

CEO pay is too high but pales when compared to entertainers and sports figures. No doubt both could pay more taxes which most would not object to if so much were not wasted. The height of selfishness and greed is the willingness to obligate the yet unborn to a debt they cannot possibly pay.

November 1, 2011 at 8:39 a.m.
lumpy said...

How humorous, the party of grope, and weiners, and rape, and of candidates who cheat on their cancer stricken wives is lynching a black man because he was accused of something that there is no proof of. Politico is nothing but a tool of the Democratic party and the left. Clay Bennett is sickening, predictable and nothing but a Democratic Party hack.

What a monstorous double standard and monumental hypocracy by the left.

This will only help Herman Cain.

It also illustrates the racist approach taken by the Democratic Party and it's hacks. Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas do not fit the mold that you Democrats want to jam black Americans into. You are racists and bigots.

You Democrats ever see the movie To Kill A Mockingbird? Huh? My gosh you're so predictable! Scare the white people by accusing a black man of being a sexual predator. The scary, dark skinned black man. Anyone can make an allegation, and take it to court. Their word against his.

I Guess Obama is your kind of black guy? Why he's light skinned, a communist, a Democrat, and makes a good speech. How dare Herman Cain be a conservative or anything other than a Democrat.

Bill Clinton, well, he's just being Bubba, the lovable, oversexed guy. But, I guess there's a double standard for a black man, huh?

You got nothing. Everytime a Republican rises to the to the polls you Democrat zombies circle the wagon and find some way to take them down by attacking them personally.

"this country's personal savior"? You must be joking, Woody, Obama had that title in 2008. "career politician"? You mean, like Obama and Biden?

You Lefties have no standing to accuse anyone of anything.

November 1, 2011 at 8:39 a.m.
Dumbledore403 said...

Lumpy- I did not vote for Clinton because of his ethics...I won't vote for Newt for the same reason... Most of the other Rs are not my choice for many reasons...Obama has been dealt a bad hand and I refuse to say no to him yet

November 1, 2011 at 8:51 a.m.
riverman said...

Pretty obvious from this cartoon that Bennett is just a white trash racist with a degree from a Directional school in Alabama.

November 1, 2011 at 9:18 a.m.
tderng said...

Cain said that what he said was that she was like his wife and came up to about here,then made a "non-sexual" gesture that brought his hand up to about chin height.All charges regarding him were found "not to be based in fact".The women took their payoff and went merrily on their way.If they are the ones who went to the press or if they even talk about the settlement they will be in contempt of court and have to pay back the settlement.This is typical of the left media to personally attack conservative politicians without giving any credible source.The problem is the media lets them get away with it.They are allowed to just make up s*&^ and the media runs with it.

November 1, 2011 at 9:27 a.m.
GreenKepi said...

"Obama has been dealt a bad hand and I refuse to say no to him yet...". What's it going to take? Just curious....

November 1, 2011 at 9:44 a.m.
MickeyRat said...

Because everybody needs two can stubbs

November 1, 2011 at 9:45 a.m.
Salsa said...

I see that Bennett got his daily e-mail from the DNC telling him what he's allowed to think today

November 1, 2011 at 9:53 a.m.
fishin43 said...

LOL The news folks are scared of this dude. What, you got your one black man and don't have room for one more who doesn't think like the other one? There AIN'T NO proof he did a damn thing. Some folks on here are Way, WAY to quick to bury this man.

November 1, 2011 at 10:06 a.m.

The same poster with President Clinton on it would be seen in the same negative light right? In all fairness? No?

November 1, 2011 at 10:52 a.m.
DarkSky said...

1st he denied it happened. Then he said there was this one incedent. We are supposed to believe that what he said happened is the truth? Typical politician reaction. It's not a racism thing to me. He's just not presidential material. Besides, he was a board member then chairman of a Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and Omaha. Because he was part of the Federal Reserve Bank is enough for me not to ever vote for him. And then there is this---

WASHINGTON (October 10, 2011)—GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain said Monday he didn't want to run for president, but God called him to join the race. The Republican candidate told CBN News that's why he believes "God's been in this from the beginning." Cain said that when he felt God calling him to run for president, he resisted just as Moses did after being called by God to lead the Hebrews out of Egypt. Like Moses, Cain says he told God, "You've got the wrong person. You can't be talking about me." Cain told CBN News that it took a lot of those "conversations with God" to overcome his reluctance to seek the presidency.

What if God tells him to nuke someone? What if God tells him to put aligators in a moat on the Mexico border? What if God tells him to kill all Muslims?

November 1, 2011 at 11:16 a.m.
Walden said...

Nothing makes the establishment Left tremble more than a conservative person from a "minority". They will stop at nothing to destroy someone fitting this description. Herman Cain and guys like Marco Rubio represent the ultimate threat to the left, that being the loss of massive amounts of voters that they have long taken for granted. This cartoon, by the way, is shameful on so many levels, I don't have time to list them all.

November 1, 2011 at 11:44 a.m.
EaTn said...

The left is not taking Cain down, Cain is taking himself down by not putting this on the table day one in announcing his intent to run. Only a fool would think that this would not be an issue--it's what the press and opponents feed on. One only needs to look at those politicians on the left and right that have been shot down, mainly because of what had been swept under the rug.

November 1, 2011 at 11:53 a.m.
MacGyverguy said...

So if it's in a cartoon form, you can say anything huh? Why stop there Bennett? Go for gold! Now that you don't have to worry those silly things called facts, you can really twist people you don't like into anything.

November 1, 2011 at 12:32 p.m.
fishin43 said...

LOL. OH, man!! Damn right. I see the way it is. Take down the minority candidates that are not Democrats. Is that the plan? Rubio and Cain. Now that's transperancy LOL

November 1, 2011 at 12:35 p.m.

Harp, your post is fantastic!

Your last sentence is right on the mark!

This cartoon is the height irresponsibilty and confirms to me that Clay Bennett is nothing but a hack and hitman, as some have put it on here. Grope! Where's the proof of that? Where's the evidence?

That's a slanderous accusation and put out there to spread rumors. All of sudden it's grown to groping? What next, rape? Oh, wait, that's ok, right? Since Bill Clinton was assused of rape?

Harp is 100% regarding lawyers and women making charges. I worked with a woman who accused our boss of sexual harassment. It never happened. She took it to court.

It seems that the left, meaning Democrats, are targeting Rubio and Cain. Truly disgusting.

November 1, 2011 at 12:47 p.m.
BigRidgePatriot said...

The Wart continues his monotonous drum beat of persistently partisan attempts at political parody. The prejudiced pig is pathetically predictable.

November 1, 2011 at 12:47 p.m.
DarkSky said...

Oh no! Those crazy leftists are attacking me because of what I did in the past. Oh, woe is me! The right wing sure had a field day with Clinton's sexual scandals. And those people who keep playing the race card in his favor, get a clue. The issue isn't about race, it's about if these allegations happened or not.

What's that saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me". So, if it's not true, he's a fool for being caught up in it twice. I might've believed him if it was one time, but there being 2 accusations shows a pattern of behavior.

This is just another example of how the American public is distracted away from more important issues by those who hold the power in the world.

IMO, Cain is a fanatic and shouldn't be in charge of the best military in the world with thousands of nukes at his disposal.

November 1, 2011 at 12:48 p.m.
DarkSky said...

Nice to see BRP is back, shooting the messenger. Lumpy and blondebutnotdumb also killing the messenger because that's much easier to do than make a valid argument supporting their position.

November 1, 2011 at 12:51 p.m.

Fishin43, I guess you dont see anything. At the end of the day you will not give Cain the nomination, this has nothing to do with liberals taking down minority canditates. We just always have a good love if one of the value-summit-speakers turn out to hide a body in the closet. It is just too funny... It seems you have to give the nomination again to an alcoholic from Texas... ... This worked out just great the last time....

November 1, 2011 at 12:51 p.m.
MTJohn said...

BigRidgePatriot said...The prejudiced pig is pathetically predictable.

As are you. Why should we conclude that your posts are anything by persistently partisan repetition of right-wing, prejudiced half truth?

November 1, 2011 at 12:57 p.m.
MTJohn said...

harp3339 said...

People are quick to convict without the full story.

Harp - I tend to agree with you. But, in this case, have you actually read the Politico article? It reports that that two women filed sexual harassment claims and that they received settlements in exchange for their silence. Beyond that, the article explains and vetts the information that the reporters used to reach those conclusions. In his denials, Cain has confirmed that two women filed sexual harassment complaints and that some form of settlement was negotiated with each of them.

November 1, 2011 at 1:02 p.m.
miraweb said...

John Stewart did a fine piece critiqueing the Cain coverage and also Perry's most recent attempt at public speaking. If you've had enough of the Cain coverage, skip ahead to around minute 5:10 for the Perry gems.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-october-31-2011/indecision-2012---ruh-roh-edition

November 1, 2011 at 1:31 p.m.
EaTn said...

Just read where yesterday was one of Cain's best fundraising days. I hope he can nip this scandal issue in the bud and rise to the GOP nomination. Nothing would be more historical and interesting than Obama- Cain debates.

November 1, 2011 at 1:42 p.m.
CrispyChip said...

I find this cartoon particularly distasteful, a simple ad hominem from an otherwise intelligent and creative artist. I don't mind considering Clay Bennett's point of view, no matter how different it may be from mine, but this cartoon tempts me to search for political cartoons from other, more mature sources. I think Mr. Bennett, and the TFP for that matter, should hold themselves to higher standards.

November 1, 2011 at 3 p.m.
whatsnottaken said...

Looks like I'll be votin' for the Groper. If Clay doesn't like him, I do. And Clay, how'd that take your ramblings at UND?

November 1, 2011 at 4:20 p.m.
sandyonsignal said...

Sexual harassment is bad enough, but not remembering it, then remembering, then saying he never paid out money, then he says he did. Whew!!! And we thought Romney was a bad flip-flopper. Cain is a liar and a pervert, perfect candidate to be the GOP nominee.

November 1, 2011 at 4:37 p.m.
mymy said...

The race card, the rape card and the sexual harassment card are just like the welfare card. All started out with good intention and all have ended up being abused for political or financial gain by unscrupulous people.

November 1, 2011 at 7:16 p.m.
dude_abides said...

Sounds like a textbook republican smear campaign! After all, why would the administration play its ace in the hole now? Better to wait until he got the nomination. This smacks of GOP keeping Herman down, which seems more than he can do with little Herman. Maybe this is what Rick Perry was celebrating in New Hampshire! If I were a Perry backer, I would hope he was messed up on something. If not, I would have doubts about his emotional stability. Let me stick my neck out here and say you will NEVER see him in that "mood" again. Cain is a bad liar, like blondie.

November 1, 2011 at 7:39 p.m.
tderng said...

proof,dude,where is the proof?Companies pay off for sexual harassment bullcrap lawsuits all the time because its cheaper than fighting it.Just another attempt by the left to discredit a black conservative.

November 1, 2011 at 8:03 p.m.
amnestiUSAF84 said...

woody said... Did he do 'it'?? Would he he do 'it'?? It's all irrelevant. We've already elected, then re-elected one president with a checkered past(?), concerning possible sexual indiscretions, not to mention at least one more(?) while in office

But it was the RepubliCANTS who've long run the premise of morals and values. They're the ones who brought the issue to the table. Now, they're having to doubletime and tap dance backwards.

tderng said... .Just another attempt by the left to discredit a black conservative.

I disagree. This is coming from Cains own GOP buddies. There's more internal fighting and, like crabs, they're pulling one another down. The so-called left doesn't have to lift a finger. They're doing the job for them.

November 1, 2011 at 8:12 p.m.

Sandy and Dude, two outstanding reasons why I'm not a Democrat.

You're both ignorant slobs.

Sandy, you would drop to your knees with a snap of Bill Clinton's or Barack Obama's fingers. You belong to the party of perverts. Seems that perverts are ok with you Liberals as long as they hold the right views. My gosh, you're vacant.

To label Cain a pervert, which there's absolutely no evidence of, speaks volumes about your character, Sandy.

Is Bill Clinton a pervert?

November 1, 2011 at 8:19 p.m.
tderng said...

amnestiUSAF84...didn't realize that politico leaned right.Thought it was a liberal enterprise,my bad.

November 1, 2011 at 8:24 p.m.
Oz said...
November 1, 2011 at 8:49 p.m.
ceeweed said...

What's the deal with Herman? So, being CEO of Godfather's Pizza is impressive? Godfather's Pizza is a failing chain that serves crumby pizza...Maybe Papa John will throw his hat in the ring...At least the Papa makes a better pie.

November 1, 2011 at 8:55 p.m.
tderng said...

America needs a Godfather...Vote for Herman Cain!!!!

November 1, 2011 at 9:41 p.m.
dude_abides said...

“When I was initially hit with this … I didn’t recall it right away,” lol

Cain said today that he recalls only one such incident, not two. lmao

“I was not touching her when I did that,” roflmao

he couldn’t recall whether he met one of the women in a hotel room while at a conference, but he never said no directly when posed the question. smfroflmao

“If the Restaurant Association did a settlement, I wasn’t aware of it." ...“I was aware that an agreement was reached. The word ‘settlement’ versus the word ‘agreement,’ you know, I’m not sure what they called it. hmgsmfroflmao

like they say on ESPN... C'mon man!

November 1, 2011 at 9:57 p.m.
dude_abides said...

tderng said... proof,dude,where is the proof?

tderng... if there were a lawsuit that lasted until after the election would you still say that? Don't you agree that the administration would wait until after his nomination to play their ace? Gotta be Texas Rick.

November 1, 2011 at 10:15 p.m.
MTJohn said...

From the Borowitz Report: Herman Cain’s burgeoning sex scandal might actually be the first sign that he is qualified to be a politician.

http://www.borowitzreport.com/

November 1, 2011 at 10:58 p.m.
alprova said...

Lumpy wrote: "How humorous, the party of grope, and weiners, and rape, and of candidates who cheat on their cancer stricken wives is lynching a black man because he was accused of something that there is no proof of."

Far more Republicans have been guilty of the above. Newt Gingrich, a Republican no less, is the one man that comes to mind when it comes to the latter you mention above. He served divorce papers on his wife while she was in the hospital being treated for cancer.

"Politico is nothing but a tool of the Democratic party and the left."

That's news to me. I've always found Politico to be rather neutral.

"Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas do not fit the mold that you Democrats want to jam black Americans into. You are racists and bigots."

Oh please. Herman Cain is being rejected for his extreme political stances, not for his skin color. If the man sexually harassed two women, which it appears that he did, then he needs to be vetted for it. Let the chips fall where they may.

"Bill Clinton, well, he's just being Bubba, the lovable, oversexed guy."

There is a little bit of a difference, way back when. He was impeached for lying, under oath, about an affair that involved mutual consent.

"Everytime a Republican rises to the to the polls you Democrat zombies circle the wagon and find some way to take them down by attacking them personally."

Do you mean like how the current President has been vilified by people like yourself, through the spreading unfounded rumors about him for four years and counting? Thou hypocrite.

"You Lefties have no standing to accuse anyone of anything."

On that issue, I can most certainly can condemn another man, for I have never in my life, ever sexually harassed a woman on this planet.

November 1, 2011 at 11:23 p.m.
fairmon said...

Quit reading prejudiced politically motivated articles and wait on the facts. The investigations concluded there were no basis for the charges and Cain didn't participate in the decision to settle versus bear the defense expense. How many people remember what they were doing 15 years ago today? Not likely anyone can be sure. It is interesting how both parties are attacking Cain. He doesn't fit their mold and doesn't try to just say what the RNC wants to hear. This may work in Cain's favor with so many people fed up with politicians. The republicans need to get down to 3 or 4 candidates without including Perry and Hilary Clinton should challenge Obama.

November 1, 2011 at 11:38 p.m.
fairmon said...

Alprova said....

On that issue, I can most certainly can condemn another man, for I have never in my life, ever sexually harassed a woman on this planet

You can stil be charged without ever having actually harassed anyone. Some women that should file charges don't, unfortunately some abuse and use the system. But, it has to be easy to file to encourage and protect those with legitimate reasons.

I don't care how many tryst Clinton had nor do I care if Gingrich filed for divorce from a wife with cancer. They worked together, balanced the budget and grew the economy. I am not looking for a church deacon or pastor, we need capable effective leadership. I don't know if Cain is it or not but the frivilous charges as reported would not keep me from voting for him if I thought he could do the job.

November 1, 2011 at 11:59 p.m.
alprova said...

Harp3339 wrote: "Quit reading prejudiced politically motivated articles and wait on the facts. The investigations concluded there were no basis for the charges and Cain didn't participate in the decision to settle versus bear the defense expense."

Do you really think that if there was a settlement, that Herman Cain was clueless as to the terms, as he is now claiming? You're delusional.

"How many people remember what they were doing 15 years ago today?"

I'd sure remember every little detail about something like that, and so would you.

"It is interesting how both parties are attacking Cain. He doesn't fit their mold and doesn't try to just say what the RNC wants to hear."

Then maybe the man is not cut out for politics, for the one consistency coming from a politician, **is"" having the ability to say what people want to hear.

Herman Cain is not disliked because he doesn't fit into a mold. He is disliked because he is dangerous. His views regarding Social Security and Medicaid, where he feels both programs need to be eliminated, combined with his "999 Plan," which only further helps those who are in upper income groups and shifts the tax burden onto the backs of the lower middle and low income individuals, are enough reason to be totally turned off to the man.

His shifting answers in response to direct questions and denial of the two instances of sexual harassment claims are laughable. He "vaguely" recalls them? Sure he does.

It's being reported tonight that one of the women is poised to come forward to defend herself against his denials.

"This may work in Cain's favor with so many people fed up with politicians."

Well of course it will. You're living proof of that.

"The republicans need to get down to 3 or 4 candidates without including Perry and Hilary Clinton should challenge Obama."

That will happen during the primaries, however, the simple fact is that President Obama will mop up the floor with whatever candidate emerges from the pack. None of them have what it takes to stand on a stage and go toe-to-toe with the President.

November 2, 2011 at 12:25 a.m.
alprova said...

Harp3339 wrote: "You can stil be charged without ever having actually harassed anyone. Some women that should file charges don't, unfortunately some abuse and use the system. But, it has to be easy to file to encourage and protect those with legitimate reasons."

Look, the fact that there was a confidentiality agreement made in both case, indicates to me that the smoke emitting into the air is coming from flames of fire. The fact that there are two cases involved, that resulted in settlements, indicates the same thing.

Right now, Herman Cain is confident and hiding behind a cloak of innocence, knowing that the confidentiality agreements are in place. The National Restaurant Association is refusing to comment on the allegations.

But Cain has waffled in his responses over the past couple of days, tremendously -- Worse than any man accused in the past. He's also admitted to more than he should have, for someone claiming to be unable to recall details about something like being accused of sexually harassing an underling, 12 years ago.

Had the man fessed up to knowing intimately all the details of the accusations, but have stood his ground on the confidentiality agreements, I might be more inclined to believe that there was nothing to report.

Politico's article pretty well laid it all out and it gave Herman Cain and the National Restaurant Association ten days to respond before it published the article.

"I don't care how many tryst Clinton had nor do I care if Gingrich filed for divorce from a wife with cancer. They worked together, balanced the budget and grew the economy."

Gingrich doesn't deserve credit for balancing the budget at all. He fought tooth and nail to pass pork that Clinton vetoed. Do you remember the incident where Gingrich was banished to sitting in the back of Air Force One and how he howled about it for a week? I sure do.

"I am not looking for a church deacon or pastor, we need capable effective leadership. I don't know if Cain is it or not but the frivilous charges as reported would not keep me from voting for him if I thought he could do the job."

Cain is a good talk show host, period. He's no leader. His views on several key issues, while admirable by people like yourself, are not going to fly with mainstream America.

I don't care if he came on to two women either. But if he did, he deserves to be put in the hot seat for it.

November 2, 2011 at 12:43 a.m.

Blondanddumb,

I never get it that conservatives dont see the difference between sexual harassement and a voluntary blow job...

... I guess good old old George Carlin nailed it when he asked why is it that people who are against abortion are people you dont want to f..k in first place...

Second, blondie, to state that the story was braught up by liberals is dumb stupid, since we domnot profit at all. I could not wish for more than a canditate Cain...

Blame the Perry group or anybody else in the GOP. This could come out straight from the karl Rowe playbook.....

November 2, 2011 at 4:33 a.m.
Fire_Obama said...
  1. How much do you remember about LIES told about you 15 years ago?
  2. As a man of faith, when affonted by false allogations his first thoughts would no doubt be to turn the issue over to God and follow through with what ever steps were appropriate based on the policies of his organization.
  3. At the time of these insodents there were a number of big dollar settlements for so called "sexual harrasement" cases. Gold diggers were everywhere claiming what ever they thought would get them a big settlement. I know this because my wife is a para legal and she remembers many cases like this.
  4. I believe Herman Cain because he is, more than any other canidate, a man of character and honor. He is NOT smooth and polished and that is a positive for me. We have had enough slick willies and would be greek gods.
  5. If these women are now willing to come forward I would not believe any of them if they are getting any kind of payment from the lame stream media for "exclusive rights to their story" "exclusive interviews" as it will not only confirm their gold digger status but prevent honest media sources from questioning them. The basis of our judicial system, the heart of it, is that the accused has a right to face and question their accusers. The liberal media does not have justice in mind, it has an agenda.
November 2, 2011 at 9:29 a.m.

Fire_Obama said

"The liberal media does not have justice in mind, it has an agenda."

First, it is a great thing that your media outlet FOX has no agenda and is fair and balanced...

This is like the Italian soccer association accusing Denmark and Sweden of cheating (as it was in 2004)... the greatest cheaters accusing others of cheating...

Second, get it in your (little) brain that the story was not brought up through liberal whistleblowing but through conservative playbook...

this is conservative on conservative crime

.... and let us liberals sit back enjoy and watch you killing each other...

November 2, 2011 at 10:15 a.m.
MTJohn said...

harp3339 said...

Quit reading prejudiced politically motivated articles and wait on the facts.

Good advice. I hope Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter take it.

November 2, 2011 at 7:14 p.m.
ceeweed said...

At least Cain is concerned that China may soon have the nuclear technology to develop a warhead....The man is a major dumb dumb. He makes the rest of the field look like Einsteins. Yet, he remains the front runner. What is it I'm not getting here?

November 2, 2011 at 7:29 p.m.
fairmon said...

alprova said...

Herman Cain is not disliked because he doesn't fit into a mold. He is disliked because he is dangerous. His views regarding Social Security and Medicaid, where he feels both programs need to be eliminated, combined with his "999 Plan," which only further helps those who are in upper income groups and shifts the tax burden onto the backs of the lower middle and low income individuals, are enough reason to be totally turned off to the man.

Dangerous? I agree social security and medicaid should be eliminated along with all the other give away programs the bloated inefficient government funds. His tax plan as stated is a transition step to the fair tax plan which is the fairest concept proposed by any source. Obama's progressive socialist more of the same failed approach is dangerous.

Poorly managed businesses, including banks should be allowed to fail. Houses under water or those with owners unable to pay the mortgage should be repossesed. Freddie and Fannie are still buying bad loans. As you probably know the unscrupolous managers of Fannie and Freddie are receiving unrealistic bonuses without justification. Tax payers would be better off if the repos were razed than what the government is doing.

November 2, 2011 at 10:42 p.m.
AndrewLohr said...

ceeweed, genius Obama has failed so badly, as liberalism is bound to do, that we need to look at something QUITE different.

Re scandal, if Clinton's alleged abortion (= murdering a baby) with Gennifer Flowers, and his alleged (he settled) misconduct with Paula Jones, and his alleged rape of (name escapes me), and his proven (blue dress) adultery with Monica, did not disqualify him to be President, excuse us if we consider and brush off lesser allegations. (And genius Clinton didn't even know what "is" is?)

November 3, 2011 at 6:14 a.m.
chet123 said...

HA HA HA All the herman cain defenders look like a fool...HERMAN CAIN made it thru his career backstabbibg and kissing butt for the rich and greedy....Herman Cain like Clarence Thomas dont have the respect of his own people or families.....Herman Cain is an egoncentric,narcissistic,greedy, hoggish,out for his own butt,walk over anyone in his way, pig. Noone like him except the republican party...and hes using them because he will say thing they want to say without being called racist. They use his dumb butt...and he know it but dont care....Cain is for Cain...he will turn on the republican before it over....its evidented by the way he treated the 3 women who worked for him.......Democrat wouldnt give that hog the time of day.....he fit the rush limbaugh and the republican party mold ha ha ha

November 3, 2011 at 8:44 p.m.
chet123 said...

Also...do you notice his wife is never with him Hmmmmmm...fellows are you too dumb to see this...hmmmm....she know hes banging other women...hes a pig

November 3, 2011 at 8:49 p.m.
Fire_Obama said...

It is just so wonderful that the left is SOOOOOOOO tolerant. How they are so kind, forgiving. How they insist that everyone is innocent until PROVEN GUILTY. Well unless of course they happen to be a conservative Black man who challenges their power base. But no one is perfect.

If we are to put anyone on trial we must apply all the the same rules as the law requires in a court of law. Imagine you were hauled into court for something. Wouldn't you want:

(a) to be considered innocent until proven guilty. Even 100 accusations does not equal a conviction.

(b) Under our court system you would expect the right to face your accuser.

(c) Your attorney would be negligent if they did not ask for discovery. This requires those making their claims against you to provide all their evidence against you so you could reasonably defend against the allegations. Suppressed evidence is not permitted to be used in court. Full disclosure of all evidence is only fair.

(d) If there are two reasonable scenarios, one of which may tend to convict you and one which reasonably would indicate a "Not Guilty" verdict jurors are instructed that they must acquit you.

If you would expect these rights to be applied in any case brought against you... how dare you suggest that anyone else should not have the same rights?

November 13, 2011 at 1:58 p.m.
Fire_Obama said...

There has been a cover up.

The cover up by the media about any details that might vindicate Herman Cain or the truth about those accusing him.

We now know that in spite of the cover story given Sharon Bialek, that she was not interested in money and she was well taken care of financially... the truth is she is NOT engaged, nor is she living with the guy the media claimed she was engaged to. She (Nor her supposed fiancee) have any visible means of support, he is filing for bankruptcy and she has not held a job in 2 years.

Tonight on Greta (Fox New at 9PM CST) we will hear from Gloria Cain herself. She stands behind her man.

The woman who is now working for the Obama administration, who got a severance pay after accusing Herman Cain at the NRA went on to her next job and tried to repeat the process there to extort money from them. They basically laughed her off.

No one is talking about the fact that the time frame in which these allegations occurred is shortly after some hefty settlements to women with similar claims and copy cat complaints were in abundance. My wife reminded me of this, she is a para legal and has worked on many such cases for the attorney's she worked for.

So YES THERE HAS BEEN A COVER UP OF THE TRUTH. And Herman Cain has been the victim of that cover up, not the instigator, not the beneficiary.

November 14, 2011 at 8:54 a.m.
chet123 said...

FIRE_OBAMA.....THIS IS WHAT YOU SOUND LIKE ..BLAH BLAH BLAH,,BLAH BLAH BLAH...LET ME GIVE YOU A LITTLE ADVICE....IT IS HARD FOR YOU TO BE OBJECTIVE WITH A NAMEE LIKE "FIRE OBAMA"....YOU GOT NERVE ENOUGH TO LECTURE ON FAIRNESS HA HA HA ...THIS IS WHY I DONT TRUST YOU REPUBLICAN.....FORGET ABOUT WAVING WHITE FLAGS....YOUR CREDIBILITY IS NOT GOOD..

I REMEMBER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY LEADING THE CHARGE POURING GAS AND STRIKING A MATCH WITH BIL CLINTON....YOU DOGGED CLINTON FOR 8 YEARS BECAUSE YOU WERE SORE LOSERS BECAUSE YOU LOST THE ELECTION....NEWT GINGRICH AND REPUBLICAN PUT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR ON BILL CLINTON TRAIL...WHILE NEWT GINGRICH WAS CHEATING ON HIS OWN WIFE HA HA HA .....BUDDY YOU ARE REALLY PICKING THE WRONG FIGHT HA HA H A

LET JUST KEEP TO OUR DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHY...ONE IS GOING TO WIN OUT OVER THE OTHER....PLEASE DONT TRY TO PLAY THE VICTIM CARD WITH THE HISTORY THE REPUBLICAN HAVE...IF YOU THINK THE DEMOCRAT IS GOING TO GIVE "GROPING HERMAN CAIN" A FREE PASS....THEN THINK AGAIN ...THIS IS WHERE OBAMA WENT WRONG..OBAMA TRIED TO WORK WITH REPUBLICANS....OBAMA FOUND OUT YOU CANT COMPROMISE NOR MAKE A DEAL WITH SATAN HA HA HA

November 16, 2011 at 1:43 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.