published Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

Big ObamaCare ruling ahead

A huge decision on the future of U.S. health care -- and on health care costs -- is ahead. The decision will be made not by patients, doctors and insurers, but by the U.S. Supreme Court, which plans to consider a challenge to ObamaCare.

It is entirely uncertain how the court will rule, after lower federal courts have issued split rulings.

The high court has four justices generally considered liberal, four who are more conservative and one -- Justice Anthony Kennedy -- who is liberal-leaning but sometimes a swing vote. For instance, he voted to impose restrictions, found nowhere in the Constitution, on states' use of the death penalty; he cited vague "evolving standards of decency" in joining a liberal 5-4 majority ruling that Louisiana could not execute child rapists.

It's sad that political or personal views often seem to enter into the high court's deliberations -- when it ought to be ruling on the facts, the law and the Constitution.

What will the high court do about ObamaCare? It should strike it down. Nothing in the Constitution can reasonably be construed to justify Congress forcing the American people to buy government-approved medical insurance -- and punishing them if they refuse.

Ever since Democrats alone passed ObamaCare, it has been remarkably unpopular with the American people, and it has been caught up in legal challenges. A majority of the states have filed suit to stop it.

Republican Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal has said ObamaCare will saddle his state with a stunning $2.5 billion price tag over the next 10 years. Former Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen -- a Democrat -- said ObamaCare will cost Tennessee $1.1 billion over seven years. He labeled it a "huge unfunded mandate."

It is desirable for all of us to have reasonable medical care. But under our Constitution, health care -- like food and housing -- should be a personal, not government, responsibility.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

Another concise, truthful, well written article by the RIGHT side of the paper! It is so sad that four to five members of the Court often rule in contempt of the Constitution they were sworn to uphold. Even worse they will have to face the one they swore to - "so help me God."

November 16, 2011 at 9:02 a.m.
Jack_Dennis said...

If the Court expands the Commerce Clause to allow this mandate, we are at last in deep doo-doo. No coming back.

November 16, 2011 at 9:13 a.m.
rolando said...

I think we all know the fix is in. The Chicago Crowd has it in hand.

We also know Kagan will never recuse herself...that would cost The Czar-In-Chief the case...something he would never allow to happen.

November 16, 2011 at 7:19 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.