published Tuesday, October 18th, 2011

City of Hamilton idea surfaces from city, county spat


by Cliff Hightower
Proposed city of Hamilton
Proposed city of Hamilton
Follow us on Twitter for the latest breaking news
Poll
Is the new city of Hamilton a good idea?

Chattanooga Mayor Ron Littlefield will deliver a detailed urban growth plan to Hamilton County today, but a grass-roots group upped the ante Monday by saying it will form its own city to make sure it is not included in those plans.

The proposed city of Hamilton would include areas of Ooltewah, Harrison, Georgetown and Birchwood.

Littlefield said he wants to amend the urban growth boundaries to expand the city's borders northward along Interstate 75 toward Bradley County, taking in parts of Ooltewah and also including the Harrison and Bartlebaugh communities. The city also would consider bringing Middle Valley into the boundaries, he said.

Chris Matthews, president of the grass-roots group -- which calls itself Friends of Hamilton -- said he and others have studied chartering their own city and have been talking to local and state representatives about the idea. They are planning a petition drive to place the incorporation issue on the November 2012 ballot.

"We feel like we have the components to move this forward," Matthews said.

Their announcement came after County Mayor Jim Coppinger responded to a city request to revisit urban growth boundaries set in 2001. Coppinger asked Littlefield for more specific information about what he wants to do.

After receiving Coppinger's letter, Littlefield said he would hand-deliver a response to the county about amending the county's urban growth boundary.

"We are happy to oblige," Littlefield said.

DUELING LETTERS

Over the past week, the city and the county have exchanged a series of hand-delivered letters about reopening discussion on urban growth boundaries. Littlefield began the exchange on Oct. 11, saying he wanted the county's urban growth boundary committee to reconvene or a new one be appointed within 60 days.

The county responded Monday, citing state law that requires more information to be submitted to the county before a committee can be convened.

"I fail to see any specific amendment[s] that you are proposing," Coppinger wrote to Littlefield.

Today's letter from Littlefield will be the third volley in the exchange. He said he purposely was vague in his first letter.

"We were trying not to presuppose what other cities would do," Littlefield said. "But since the county raised the question, I'll be happy to answer."

The time is ripe to look at growth within the county after the startup of Volkswagen's plant and growth around that area, Littlefield said.

The 60-day timeline for convening the committee should start today when the county gets his second letter, he said. He also wants the committee to examine coming up with a more centralized board for water, stormwater and sewer services.

  • photo
    In this file photo Jim Coppinger speaks to reporters after taking the oath of office to become Hamilton County Mayor on Jan. 11, 2011.
    Photo by John Rawlston /Chattanooga Times Free Press.

FRIENDS OF HAMILTON

Friends of Hamilton County wants Hamilton's boundaries to roughly stretch west to east from the Tennessee River to Bradley County and be bounded by state Route 60 to the north. The southern boundary would be around Mahan Gap Road, according to a map on the group's website, friendsofhamilton.org.

The group first started talking about the idea "a couple of months ago," Matthews said, and decided to move forward with their plan after Littlefield asked to reopen growth boundary talks.

Upon hearing about the proposed incorporation, Littlefield said Monday that those types of conversations need to be taking place within an urban growth boundary committee. The only thing residents should know, he said, is incorporation also means they must provide services such as police and fire.

"I'm not surprised or bothered they would propose this," he said.

County Commissioner Chester Bankston, whose district includes the proposed incorporation areas, said he has met with Matthews about the incorporation.

"They're going to pursue it and see how far they can get with it," Bankston said. "If the people are for it and it's a good thing, I'm behind it."

  • photo
    Hamilton County Commissioner Chester Bankston from District 9

Group members realize incorporation would necessitate property tax collection under state law, Matthews said, but residents would pay what he said would be a much lower tax rate in order to avoid paying Chattanooga property taxes after being annexed.

The group also understands that being placed in the urban growth boundary does not automatically mean they will be annexed, Matthews said, but he thinks residents are willing to incorporate now instead of being annexed years down the road.

"Twenty years down the road, we may not have an option," he said.

Matthews said the group initially thought of the town's name as Ooltewah, but as more communities in the area joined, the group decided it should come up with a more suitable name.

Residents live in Hamilton County and are proud to live here, Matthews said, so the name pays tribute to that.

Connect with the Times Free Press on Facebook

about Ansley Haman...

Ansley Haman covers Hamilton County government. A native of Spring City, Tenn., she grew up reading the Chattanooga Times and Chattanooga Free Press, which sparked her passion for journalism. Ansley's happy to be home after a decade of adventures in more than 20 countries and 40 states. She gathered stories while living, working and studying in Swansea, Wales, Cape Town, South Africa, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Ga., and Knoxville, Tenn. Along the way, she interned for ...

1
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
MasterChefLen said...

Chattanooga Mayor Ron Littlefield and the city council would be against any vote by citizens in this matter. The corrupt mayor and his rubberstamp city council would much rather take more area against the will of the citizens in those areas. The result of which would realistically be taxation without any meaningful representation nor any real benefit.

October 18, 2011 at 9:12 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.