published Saturday, September 3rd, 2011

Profits before health?

On Friday, President Barack Obama instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to drop implementation of new regulations that would have reduced the nation's smog levels. The decision elicited prompt reactions from the groups most interested in the rules. Big business, of course, praised it. Environmentalists understandably condemned it. Ordinary Americans, who have the most to lose because of the president's act, should denounce the president's decision, too.

The rules scrapped by the president would have reduced the amount of low-level ozone, the main ingredient in smog, that businesses were allowed to emit. Corporations argued against the new rules, saying that they would be so costly to implement that they would be a drag on job creation and, though they weren't quite so vocal about them, profits. That's an entirely self-serving view that should have no political traction.

Unfortunately, lobbyists for industry have enough clout and enough money to influence legislative decision-making. Their determined and expensive campaign to sway the president clearly carried the day. Though the president tried to put a good spin on his decision, it's difficult to see it for anything other than capitulation to those who put profit ahead of the public good.

Obama said he was ending the effort to tighten the rules because he wanted to reduce what he called "regulatory burdens." That's a phrase straight from the conservative phrase book. Their goal, though they are reluctant to admit it publicly, is to reduce government regulation in order to maximize profits. In this instance, the victory likely will prove immensely profitable for Big Business. The triumph, though, comes at great cost to America and Americans.

Smog is dangerous to human health. There is undeniable evidence that it contributes to respiratory illness, cardiac disease and that it can lead to premature death. Knowledge of those facts is one reason why there is a need to tighten the rules governing smog levels. The lower the level of smog, the lower the incidence of illnesses and deaths related to it. The ultimate goal should be the elimination of airborne, illness-causing pollutants. That might not be possible in the short-run, but incremental reductions of the kind scuttled by the president would have been a step in the right direction.

Tighter regulations, according to public health and environmental groups, could save about 4,300 lives a year, help prevent more than 2,000 heart attacks annually and lead to considerable reductions in health care costs. The new smog regulations, for example, would make breathing easier for the millions of Americans with asthma and other respiratory ailments. Experts say total health care cost savings from the proposed regulations could have reached $37 billion annually.

The president said Friday that his withdrawal of the regulation did not reflect a weakening of his commitment to protect public health and the environment. "I will continue to stand with the hardworking men and women at the EPA as they strive every day to hold polluters accountable and protect our families from harmful pollution." His action, though, suggests otherwise.

The Obama retreat on the new ozone-smog standard suggests that the president and his advisers now believe that political and other concerns outweigh the health and environmental benefits of the EPA regulations that were scheduled to take affect. The decision not to implement the rules, it appears, is a calculated move to mute charges -- mainly from the conservative right, from Congressional Republicans and from the business community -- that excessive regulation is a drag on the nation's economy and on job creation.

Whatever the president says and however he couches the decision, he can't escape the truth. Friday's decision to stop the new regulations is a significant victory for the business lobby and a major defeat for those who put good health and clean air before profits.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

I just love it when the left eats its own. Oblamer is a gonner! If you really believed what you wrote, you would be wearing a hazmat suit or at least gas mask because - THE SKY IS FALLING,THE SKY IS FALLING!

September 3, 2011 at 8 a.m.
potcat said...

Obama is not a gonner, he has done exactly what he was put in office for, by the big bank money Cult. Who do you think runs things in this Country?

What he says and what he DOES are two different things. People actually believe they vote the President into office, nothing could be further than the truth.

Of course, he has to run either Democrat or Republican, one has to have a PARTY to hide behind, but it has nothing to do with getting the Title.

Obama was vetted and approved by the MONEY CULT, not the American Voter, he is doing their bidding and he has done an excellent job.

Obama will have a second term, its done decided.

September 3, 2011 at 10:11 a.m.
ceeweed said...

potcat, you are so right!... There is not a dimes worth of difference between George W. and Obama!... A honest person with morals and ethics, that cannot be corrupted, cannot get elected at any level. Campaigns are expensive. Politics does not lend itself to blunt, in-your-face honesty. Truth seems elusive to the body politics. We the Sheeple are kept in the dark and fed a steady diet of crap. That would be great if we were all mushrooms...

September 3, 2011 at 10:48 a.m.
EaTn said...

I frankly don't think anyone should breathe anything they can't see..

September 3, 2011 at 10:58 a.m.
librul said...

So, Vote Republican and get in-your-face fascism -- vote Democrat and get behind-the-scenes fascism. American democracy is a dead duck. Lock and load.

September 3, 2011 at 12:51 p.m.
inthemiddle said...

Eatn: Does that include air?

September 3, 2011 at 11:48 p.m.
astermeds said...

Thanks for sharing another great post and I appreciate the way you have covered up different subject in one of the post.

October 30, 2011 at 11:21 p.m.
belladiaz said...

This is one of the best topic which i read here..I think you shared a very important subject ..Thanks for putting such great efforts.

January 13, 2012 at 2:01 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.