published Monday, September 5th, 2011

City, county have options in forms of government

Follow us on Twitter for the latest breaking news


• Knox

• Shelby

• Charter efforts ongoing in Giles and Fentress counties


• Resolution by county commission

• Proclamation by county mayor ratified by two-thirds majority of county commission

• Petition by 10 percent of qualified voters

• Private act of the Tennessee General Assembly


• Nashville/Davidson County

• Lynchburg/Moore County

• Hartsville/Trousdale County


Metropolitan: A noncharter county and city consolidate. There are several ways to form a charter commission:

• Private act of the Tennessee General Assembly

• Petition signed by 10 percent of qualified voters who cast ballots in the previous gubernatorial election

• Resolution approved by majority votes of the county commission and most-populous city. (County mayor appoints 10 members, city mayor appoints five.)

Unification: A charter county and a city consolidate. Ways to form a charter commission include:

• Proclamation by county mayor, subject to ratification by county commission

• Resolution of the county commission approved by city council of the most populous city. (City and county mayors each appoint eight members, mayors of smaller cities electing to participate appoint one member each.)

• Requires a chief executive and a legislative body of no more than 19 members

(No Tennessee government is a unification government, though an unsuccessful attempt was made in Knoxville and Knox County.)

Sources: Ron Fults, Knox County Law Director Joseph Jarret, County Technical Assistance Service, Tennessee Code

As Chattanooga Mayor Ron Littlefield continues to push for the consolidation of the city and Hamilton County, residents might need to brush up on the forms of government allowed by Tennessee law.

Understanding the difference between consolidated governments such as Nashville and Davidson County, and charter counties such as Knox and Shelby, is difficult for many state residents, said Gary Hayes, with the University of Tennessee's County Technical Assistance Service.

"The primary difference between metro and charter is you can exercise more power [in metro]," Hayes said. "The whole theory of [metro government] is that down the road you're going to get more cost-effective government."

In both situations, the local government can make laws in areas where state law is silent, Hayes said.

State law changed in 1978 to allow counties to create their own forms of government. Two counties successfully created and passed charters -- Shelby and Knox.

"Charter government only affects the county," Hayes said. "The city has no say-so in the form of charter make-up."

Knox County Law Director Joseph Jarret said the charter makes local governance easier.

"It gives us the ability to pass local laws, provided they don't conflict with state laws," he said.

Knox and Shelby counties adopted charters before a 1995 law gave counties the authority to pass ordinances. The legal changes reduced the incentive to create a charter government, Hayes said.

But charter government has its drawbacks, Hayes said. Few cases testing the boundaries of charter governments exist, leaving some uncertainty about what such governments can and cannot do.

For 25 years, counties operated under the assumption that a charter could not change the roles of constitutional officers such as trustee, county clerk and register of deeds. A 2007 Tennessee Supreme Court decision in a Knox County suit reiterated that counties could alter constitutional offices through a charter.

A Knox County citizens group unsuccessfully attempted to change some of the constitutional officers from elected seats to appointed ones in a recent referendum, Jarret said. A separate citizen referendum reduced the size of the Knox County Commission from 19 to 11 members.


One of the three metropolitan governments in the state -- the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County -- is often heralded as an example of consolidation.

The government formed in 1963 to avoid quarrels about annexation by ordinance, said Ron Fults, legal counsel with the Greater Nashville Economic Council. Two political forces, the executives of Nashville and Davidson County, pursued consolidation.

Fults said metro government assists with economic development. He said it played a part when Bud Adams decided to move the Tennessee Titans to Nashville.

"In Nashville he only had to deal with only one local government," Fults said. "In Memphis he would have to deal with both the city mayor and the county mayor."

Consolidation also has been used as a defensive mechanism. Lynchburg and Moore County consolidated to prevent annexation by Tullahoma, Fults said.

Once a government consolidates, the consensus legal opinion is that other municipalities cannot annex into it, Fults said.

Smaller charter governments within a consolidated county can elect to give up their charters but don't have to.

Hayes said one benefit to residents of metro governments is they get one tax bill.

Connect with the Times Free Press on Facebook

about Ansley Haman...

Ansley Haman covers Hamilton County government. A native of Spring City, Tenn., she grew up reading the Chattanooga Times and Chattanooga Free Press, which sparked her passion for journalism. Ansley's happy to be home after a decade of adventures in more than 20 countries and 40 states. She gathered stories while living, working and studying in Swansea, Wales, Cape Town, South Africa, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, Ga., and Knoxville, Tenn. Along the way, she interned for ...

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
lanaland said...

If we let our corrupt local government expand into the county, with its self-dealing bubbas, we're just handing the politicians a new excuse to further fatten the salaries of their merged lackeys, and themselves. We'll have a more expensive corrupt government, not reduced duplication of services or better service! Let's oust the bubbas and reform before we put it all in the same pot!

September 5, 2011 at 11:46 a.m.
chrisbrooks said...

Metropolitan government is being publicly marketed as a channel to facilitate economic development, the idea being that BIG business would prefer to court only one government & one set of politicians, not several. This is a highly disappointing narrative that shows how out of touch our local political institutions, and the business interests they represent, are from the struggles of poor and working people. With the arrival of VW & Amazon it should be clear that we have no problems bringing BIG business here with the lure of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer handouts, but we still have schools with no text books, whole communities with no grocery store, rampant crime, and fewer services for our city's most vulnerable populations, such as the disabled, abused & neglected children, and the homeless.

Rather than further centralizing the decisions making practices of our city and county into the hands of a small number of laregely unaccountable representatives who are more often than not responsive only to the needs of the same or competing concentrations of organized money (the Chamber, the Mountain, this crew of land developers as opposed to that crew), we should emphasize the cultivation of a grassroots renaissance: providing the education & organizaton citizens need to participate meaningfully in co-determining the conditions they live, work and play in.

September 5, 2011 at 12:23 p.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.