published Wednesday, September 7th, 2011

Alarming lack of job creation in August

To tens of millions of Americans who have no jobs or who cannot get enough hours at their part-time jobs to support themselves and their families, the most recent employment report will not come as any surprise.

In August, there was no net increase of jobs in the U.S. economy, and the unemployment rate remained stuck at 9.1 percent. That was the worst jobs report since last September, according to the Labor Department.

The alarming jobs figure in August seemed to take quite a few experts unawares. Economists had predicted -- or perhaps hoped -- that a net 93,000 jobs would be created in August, so it was an unpleasant surprise when new jobs were not created.

In fact, from June through August, job creation averaged only about 35,000 positions per month. That's obviously preferable to actually losing jobs, but that number is not nearly enough to keep up with the normal growth of our nation's workforce.

The United States needs to be producing about a quarter of a million new jobs a month to begin making progress against our high unemployment rate. The indicators from the past few months -- and the ongoing push in Washington to throw good spending after bad -- do not suggest that major private-sector job growth will be happening anytime in the near future.

Considering our high unemployment -- as well as the continuing housing market collapse, low consumer confidence and economic expansion of only 0.7 percent in the first half of this year -- can there really be much doubt that we face the serious possibility of another recession?

And even if we technically do not fall into a new recession, the likelihood of robust growth seems remote at best.

"[E]ven if the U.S. economy doesn't start to contract again, any expansion is going to be very, very modest and fall well short of what would be needed to drive the still-elevated unemployment rate lower," Paul Ashworth, an economist at Capital Economics, told The Associated Press.

President Barack Obama plans to deliver a big speech later this week on his plan to create jobs. But it is expected to be more of the same -- lots of government spending and borrowing to "stimulate" the economy.

We would rather he give a speech candidly acknowledging that the previous stimulus didn't work, and that the federal government is going to get out of the way of the free-market economy, cease its threats of tax increases, and roll back undue, job-killing regulations in ObamaCare and other unwieldy programs.

But we won't hold our breath waiting for that speech from our big-spending president.

10
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
acerigger said...

I just can't understand it,, after all those Republicans were elected in 2010 running on "jobs,jobs,jobs"??

September 7, 2011 at 12:31 a.m.
EaTn said...

Our congress has spent the last two years posturing instead of working together figuring out a plan to put the unemployed back to work. The GOP tax cuts have not worked, nor the Obama stimulus. It's time to scrap both and do a bipartisan deal that will work. The American people in general don't give a big rat about partisan politicians gleaming the media.

September 7, 2011 at 6:53 a.m.
EaTn said...

Winger, maybe you should read something to broaden your knowledge--the House is currently ruled by the GOP. And before 2008 the right-wingers were busy driving the country into debt. Neither party in DC is concerned about anything except their own political benefits.

September 7, 2011 at 8:01 a.m.
conservative said...

Your comment about about getting the government out of the way of the free-market economy nailed it. Our nation's problem is that Oblamer, the demoncrats and the lieberals want a government economy, and just like all Socialists, they call on the government to create jobs.

September 7, 2011 at 9:33 a.m.
acerigger said...

tvsuck,where did you get the idea that I have a "king"? We have a "president" in my country.

Sure glad the long holiday weekend is over,so you kids can get back to grammer school.

September 7, 2011 at 1:12 p.m.
nucanuck said...

Interesting that Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden, and Finland all have extensive social services and higher taxes than the US yet are all rated as more competitive. And all have far lower unemployment and higher contentment indexes.

How could that be?

September 7, 2011 at 3:50 p.m.
conservative said...

Go live in one of those countries, then write and let us know "how could that be?".

September 7, 2011 at 4:31 p.m.
nucanuck said...

Sweden is considerer the most advanced country on earth, and as I said earlier the contentment factor far exceeds the US rating.

Many USians incorrectly believe that the US is the best place to live. That may have been true several decades back, I think so, but certainly not now.

September 7, 2011 at 5:45 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.