published Monday, September 12th, 2011

Chattanooga board member encourages more maintenance on buildings

David Moore, near left, patches a ceiling in Brenda Robinson’s apartment at Cromwell Hills Apartments.
David Moore, near left, patches a ceiling in Brenda Robinson’s apartment at Cromwell Hills Apartments.
Photo by Tim Barber.
Follow us on Twitter for the latest breaking news

The Chattanooga Housing Authority has hired more than a dozen part-time workers to fix up public housing in anticipation of federal inspections.

The goal is to score well on the Public Housing Assessment System and get off the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s list of troubled public housing agencies.

Inspections start this month and are to continue through the end of the year.

But CHA board member James Sattler challenged CHA staff on its practice of preparing buildings for HUD and called for more effort to maintain the apartments year round.

“Why are we just making this sudden move to get a higher score?” Sattler asked at a recent board meeting. “Why aren’t we maintaining our properties that way initially?”

CHA Executive Director Betsy McCright said CHA doesn’t have enough money to maintain the buildings on a regular basis.

“That’s one of our biggest challenges,” she said, “to be given less money and asked to do more.”

Housing officials hired 14 temporary workers for 60 days to help “clean up some of the problems that we know are going to down our score,” said Doug Wrinn, development project manager.

Workers are painting, repairing leaking roofs, checking smoke detectors and repairing holes in buildings at each of CHA’s 15 sites.

CHA officials say they’re most concerned about the older sites such as East Lake Courts, built in the 1940s; College Hill Courts, built in the late 1930s; and Harriet Tubman, built in the 1950s and ’60s. Those are the oldest and largest properties and carry the most weight in scoring, and they have the biggest operational needs, officials said.

The Tubman site has buildings in such ill repair that housing officials have said it would cost $33 million to bring it up to good condition. Instead, CHA officials want to sell or demolish the site.

At the board meeting, Wrinn noted that HUD has changed some of its expectations concerning upkeep, possibly making it more difficult to maintain the buildings at federal standards.

But Sattler wasn’t satisfied.

“What I’m basically saying,” said Sattler, “is why don’t we maintain the buildings to the level of not what HUD expects them to be, but what we expect them to be?”

Sattler and CHA board Chairman Eddie Holmes suggested using public housing residents to do some of the repairs, giving them the opportunity to show pride in their community and to avoid hiring outside workers.

McCright said residents aren’t allowed to do the work that is usually performed by hired staff.

Connect with the Times Free Press on Facebook

about Yolanda Putman...

Yolanda Putman has been a reporter at the Times Free Press for 11 years. She covers housing and previously covered education and crime. Yolanda is a Chattanooga native who has a master’s degree in communication from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Alabama State University. She previously worked at the Lima (Ohio) News. She enjoys running, reading and writing and is the mother of one son, Tyreese. She has also ...

3
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
joetheplumber said...

You have got o be kidding! 33 million dollars? What have these animals done to the place? Here is an idea for you, spend 3 or 4 thousand and train these people to live like humans. Public housing, for anyone under the age of 65, should be done away with. They are currently breeding grounds for uneducated whores and drug dealers.

September 12, 2011 at 1:17 a.m.
01centare said...

But CHA board member James Sattler challenged CHA staff on its practice of preparing buildings for HUD and called for more effort to maintain the apartments year round. “Why are we just making this sudden move to get a higher score?”

I agree with Mr. Sattler. I've always wondered why CHA doesn't hire people who live at these public housing sites and who are out of work to keep the facilities up year around? This would guarantee self sufficiency, pride in their communities, all the while learning valuable skills. Under prior leaderships many of the people who lived in public housing also worked there. They kept the lawns mowed, yards clean, learned basic repair and maintenance work that led to even greater job skills. Now, the individuals who work at these sites may live as far away as Soddy Daisy, Hixson or Harrison. Even basic security could be handled by the individuals who live in public housing at a cheaper price. Outsiders, with no ties to the community, usually screw up and make things worse for the tenants.

September 12, 2011 at 10:10 a.m.
01centare said...

Don't worry, joetheplumber. Only a small fraction of that 33 million will be spent on these public housing units. The rest will go to builing 300K condos downtown somewhere, just like prior HUD fundings allocated for these apartments. It's all a sham!

September 12, 2011 at 10:14 a.m.
please login to post a comment

Other National Articles

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.