published Wednesday, July 18th, 2012

Absurdity averted

Whew, that was close!

Georgia has decided that it will not, after all, inject the input of students — including even very young ones — into its formal evaluations of teachers in public schools.

And that’s a good thing.

There is admittedly not a lot of agreement on how best to assess the effectiveness of teachers. Some want schools to rely largely on the concrete performance data provided by students’ success or failure on standardized tests. Others suggest that standardized tests don’t capture fully what a teacher may be accomplishing, and they insist on “broader measures.”

But where there should be agreement across the political spectrum is that the often all-too-flighty opinions of elementary, middle and high school students themselves should not form any significant part of the official evaluation of teachers.

That is not to say that students are unintelligent or malicious, much less that every criticism or praise of a teacher by a student is invalid.

But wisdom still comes with experience, and experience still comes with time. And students simply lack the maturity to judge dispassionately whether their teachers are doing a good job.

Look back on your own academic career, no matter how long or short it may have been. Were there not some nice, chummy teachers you liked but from whom, on reflection, you may not have learned a lot? Would you not, at that time, have been likely to give such a teacher unjustifiably glowing marks on an evaluation?

Conversely, would you not have been apt to write a harsh evaluation of a teacher who was more interested in setting high academic standards than in being buddy-buddy with students?

Those sorts of concerns — as well as the fear of lawsuits — apparently prompted John Barge, Georgia schools superintendent, to send the federal government a letter stating that student input will not become part of teacher evaluations. It will be used for informational purposes only.

That could put at risk $33 million of the $400 million Georgia snagged from the federal Race to the Top program, because its initial plans for teacher evaluations were part of why it got the money.

Set aside for now the insanity of states having to beg for federal handouts of tax dollars that came from residents of the states to fund something — education — that is constitutionally a duty of the states and the people, not Washington.

Even allowing for such a nonsensical arrangement, it tells us something troubling about the federal government that it would want students to have a formal say in whether a teacher is performing her duties competently. There are much fairer, more objective ways to approach that question.

Georgia is right to change course, and the possibility of a $33 million federal funding cut is a small price to pay for keeping potentially mind-boggling pettiness out of teacher evaluations.

3
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
Fendrel said...

I would disagree. I think you underestimate both the maturity and "wisdom" of the students. I was quite aware of which of my teachers were doing a good job and which ones didn't exhibit any passion or concern for their work.

It had nothing to do with which ones gave the most homework (most of the good ones in fact gave the most homework), or which one's were strictest or more lax, there were good and bad teachers on both sides of that line.

I would wager that any teacher whom a majority of students considered a poor teacher probably is just that...and that the reverse is also probably true. I have no problem believing that students would do an excellent job in rating their teachers, they may not be able to effectively discriminate between those who fall somewhere in the middle, but I doubt they would have any problems identifying the exceptionally good teachers and those who are doing a piss poor job.

For the most part, kids WANT a teacher who can present the material in an interesting, engaging and creative manner. Those who can make the learning process enjoyable and at the same time challenging. Those kids are uniquely qualified to tell us how effectively their teachers are reaching those goals.

July 18, 2012 at 10:13 a.m.

Determinative? No. But as part of the overall metric? Yeah, pretty much everybody realizes that students do matter.

You know what's terrible, when a teacher is bad, the students know it, but nothing is done.

Go ahead, encourage that.

July 18, 2012 at 2:59 p.m.
Leaf said...

Yeah, I've noticed that people who do a good job in any field encourage feedback, and those who do a bad job don't want it. Funny how that works out, huh?

July 19, 2012 at 10:28 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.