published Saturday, July 21st, 2012

Obama's flip that flopped

In 1996, after bipartisan work, the Republican-controlled congress passed, and Democrat Bill Clinton signed, reforms to welfare that honored the belief that able-bodied adults should be required to work as part of receiving taxpayer funded, government assistance.

That reform legislation accomplished three things, according to a 2003 study by the Heritage Foundation: reducing "welfare dependence and increase employment," reducing "child poverty" and reducing "illegitimacy and strengthening marriage."

A central component to welfare reform was replacing the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program, which gave cash handouts to families with little oversight or incentive to get off the program, with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), which gave money to states in the form of a block grant. States could control payments and eligibility requirements, and install incentives for recipients to successfully get back on their feet -- including work requirements.

President Barack Obama, in a shocking move that attacked the spirit of TANF, issued a directive through the Department of Health and Human Services that "the traditional TANF work requirements can be waived or overridden" by regulatory maneuvering under Social Security laws.

Facing questions about the federal government's ability to issue waivers to bypass TANF work requirements back in 2001, the non-partisan Congressional Research Service published a clarification stating that there is no authority to override federal law through an agency's action that could negate "mandatory work requirements."

So fortunately, it turns out that Obama's waiver scheme is likely unallowable since some goofy agency directive can't throw out the work requirements.

Still, it reveals a desperate candidate, not a leader.

Keep in mind that these work requirements apply only to the "able-bodied" -- or, in other words, people who shouldn't be sitting around and leeching off of hard-working taxpayers. So they're pretty hard for a reasonable person to oppose.

Yet, an arrogant, unrestrained individual with a singular aim to remain in power has shown his irresponsible desire to entice those looking to be cared for by the government during an election year.

Doubt this? In 2008, while running against Sen. John McCain for the presidency, Barack Obama proclaimed at the Saddleback Debate to Pastor Rick Warren, "I always believed that welfare had to be changed. I was much more concerned ten years ago when President Clinton initially signed the bill that this could have disastrous results...it worked better than I think a lot of people anticipated. And one of the things that I am absolutely convinced of is that we have to have work as a centerpiece of any social policy. Not only because, ultimately people who work are going to get more income. But the intrinsic dignity of work...we were made for work..."

Proving former presidential candidate Newt Gingrich correct about being the "Food Stamp President," Barack Obama's flip-flop shows electioneering at its worst and reveals a man who has a core of convenience, not conviction.

14
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.

Wow, I'm just amazed you recall the welfare reform act in the nineties. You know how many people here hadn't heard of it and keep asking for reforms already enacted in it?

I'd discuss your other comments, but you have the facts wrong anyway, so what would be the point?

July 21, 2012 at 12:15 a.m.
annisisbell said...

Under the control of jews America has become very communistic. Welfare, affirmative action, political correctness, cultural marxism, were all part of communism.

Today blacks have EBT cards and can buy anything with them, not just food. In Knoxville recently a black guy with several baby mamas, had 32 kids. His photo appeared with the article reporting that he appeared at government offices to try to get the government to take care of his kids and relive him of monthly payments to care for them.

The hostile elites who have taken over our government are trying to bankrupt us. Illegals have already bankrupted California which used to be one of the biggest economies in the world yet the government is making illegals legal.

There is only one conclusion to come to when you fight bankrupting wars for israel and throw open your borders to welfare dependents and leeches.

July 21, 2012 at 8:28 a.m.
charivara said...

"Barack Obama's flip-flop shows electioneering at its worst and reveals a man who has a core of convenience, not conviction." Oh come on. And you support Mitt Romney's efforts to become President? Because he has a core of conviction? You really need to seek professional help and leave the editorial writing to someone with a grasp on reality.

July 21, 2012 at 9:21 a.m.
timbo said...

happywithnewboobs....yea, your facts are always "straight." Straight down the liberal line. Do you people have some kind of handbook or get a mass e-mail to tell you what to say. Think up something original or keep quiet. You are a joke.

July 21, 2012 at 9:43 a.m.
Easy123 said...

timbo,

Your facts are always "straight." Straight down the ultra-conservative line. Do you people have some kind of handbook or get a mass e-mail to tell you what to say. Think up something original or keep quiet. You are a joke.

July 21, 2012 at 11:28 a.m.
joneses said...

I remember when Bill Clinton signed TANF into law and all the liberals were praising him for doing this. Now Hussein Obama has canceled this and all the liberals are praising him. This is just another example of liberal hypocrisy. It is amazing how liberals are to afraid to hold Hussein Obama accountable for his ridiculous failures. It is really amazing.

July 21, 2012 at 1:51 p.m.
shen said...

joneses, both you and pill addicted limPbaugh have run that Hussein crap in the ground when referring to the president. What's your point really? Trying to send out some subliminal messages or something to the Jim Holmes types out there or something?

annisBUELLA, affirmative action has worked well as a birthright for you and your ancestors for more than 600 years in America. Why are you complaining now? It still works for you as your birthright. Don't want to share in the harvest? How UN-Christian of you!

July 21, 2012 at 2:43 p.m.
joneses said...

shen,

The fool you put in the White House name is "Hussein Obama". Why is his name a problem for you?

July 22, 2012 at 7:40 a.m.
DJHBRAINERD said...

NAFTA FOLLOWED BY WELFARE REFORM.

Our economy was shifting toward high tech jobs of the future during the tech bubble so it was of no concern when we started getting our clothes from Mexico. Businesses, without having to worry about tarrifs, moved the manufacturing of everything they could out of this country to where they could pay wages not up to our living standerd. Each time a job left a person became unemployed. No longer paying taxes but consuming government funds to survive. Each time this happened one less person was eating out, going to the movies or on vacations. I like to think of this as trickle up economics. As in the unemployment rate. Don't need as many waiters if noone can afford to eat out. This is a positive feedback mechanisim as in it feeds on itsself. So after we were sold out the very same polititions enacted welfare reform to insure able bodied people were excluded from long term benifits. Theses are the same people who had a living wage job before NAFTA. I guess it was a coincidence welfare reform came about just after NAFTA. I know that doesn't fit into everyone's worldview but people generally want to earn a living and have nice things. Fast forward to 2012 and we are supposed to be upset at Ralph Lauren? All this while we send the same polititions back again and again to try to solve the problems they have made in the first place? Just keep cheering for your team while demonizing the unemployed It is easier than thinking for yourself.

July 22, 2012 at 9:25 a.m.
MasterChefLen said...

If they would put a time limit on welfare similar to that of unemployment compensation, the long term able'd bodied people would have more incentive to look for and get work. They may not like the work, but hey, that's why that call it work. They may even be less likely to have more children with several baby daddies. Just the same, they will probably still be convinced that someone else is responsible for their problems and economic condition.

July 22, 2012 at 2:20 p.m.

Um, MasterChefLen...guess what?

The 1996 Reforms mentioned at the start of this article...did just that. Newt Gingrich said so.

July 22, 2012 at 2:46 p.m.
DJHBRAINERD said...

I paid a guy walking down the street 5$ to pick up the litter on my side street a couple weeks ago. I got tired of looking at the fast food wrappers and pizza boxes that people actually throw out of their vehicles. Lots of beer bottles as well. The house next to mine has been foreclosed and the yard is in disarrey. I went out of town and it has been raining ever since I returned last week so my yard is in disarry. I got my notice of code violation in the mail, got 10 days to comply. That got me thinking. I walk all around my neighborhood and see litter and brush. There are a lot of foreclosed properties that need attention. My point is there are many things that ablebodied people could be doing to earn that welfare check. We should have a program using carta to pick up folks from various locations around the city(free bus fare to get them to the designated places) and do some general upkeep of our neighborhoods. Pick up the litter, clear the downed brush and give some attention to the overgrown yards that are sitting vacant. If you consider picking up litter and yard work as undignified add in some work around the recycle center or food bank. Maybe even the homeless shelter or a few of our parks / trails could use some upkeep. There are a lot of needs in our community that nondisabled welfare recipients could be providing.

July 22, 2012 at 2:58 p.m.
MasterChefLen said...

happywithnewbulbs, so what's your solution? Or do you think able bodied people being on welfare for many generations and having multiple babies (that they obviously cannot afford) being supported by the people that are working hard, paying taxes, and doing the best they can to better themselves is not a problem? Anyone can make something a partisan issue, however, I would think both Republicans and Democrats resent supporting people who CHOOSE not to work.

July 22, 2012 at 5:19 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.