published Tuesday, June 26th, 2012

A costly ruling for Chattanooga's Passage on the riverfront

  • photo
    Staff Photo by Angela Lewis/Chattanooga Times Free Press Repairs may be necessary for the boat dock area near the Passage.

It’s a comedy of errors, minus the laughs.

To perhaps no one’s great surprise, a state appeals court has upheld a lower court’s 2011 decision throwing out Chattanooga’s case against River City Co. and two associates over costly repairs at the attractive but problem-plagued Passage on the riverfront.

The celebrated project and other Tennessee River waterfront work formally were unveiled in 2005, though there are indications that the city early on saw some electrical and other problems.

But the specifics of whether one party or another was responsible for those problems have not really been the focus of the court rulings. Rather, the courts have said, the city simply failed to file the lawsuit within the three-year statute of limitations.

“Chattanooga had constructive and actual knowledge of the construction defects and damage regarding the project,” Judge John McClarty wrote recently in upholding the original decision throwing out the case. “The evidence supports the determination of the trial court.”

Translation: too bad, so sad, Chattanooga.

The city, which has spent well over $1 million to renovate the Passage and faces potentially $8 million in costs for additional repairs along the waterfront, is considering an appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court. That seems to be a long shot at best.

It is painfully likely that local taxpayers will be left holding the bag — evidently because the city was not adequately prompt and aggressive when the problems first began appearing.

2
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
raygunz said...

They should have gotten a better warranty,or maybe hired qualified union contractors.

But the "ol' buddy" system got the money&run!(again)

June 26, 2012 at 12:27 a.m.
MasterChefLen said...

If union contractors built it, it would cost 4 times as much, and to this day would probably not be finished. They seem to have all the time in the world to protest (shake down) corners with their shame signs. They even had the nerve to protest a church being built. On plus side, if they did build the riverfront landing, it would probably take less concrete (filled with mafia corpses).

June 26, 2012 at 10:42 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.