published Thursday, October 11th, 2012

Chavez: More trouble for U.S.?

Given the protracted battle between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney for the White House, it is almost understandable that many U.S. residents paid little heed to the other major presidential election in the Americas this fall. That one pitted incumbent Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez against Henrique Capriles Radonski. Chavez's victory earlier this week, though, requires attention from U.S. policymakers.

Chavez has plagued the United States since he first was elected in 1998. Normally, the leader of a relatively small South American nation wouldn't have much impact on the United States. Chavez is different. Venezuela has the globe's largest proven oil reserves and is a major exporter of petroleum. That provides him with a very public stage.

The Venezuelan isn't shy about using it. He's challenged U.S. policies by supporting anti-U.S. political campaigns in Nicaragua, Ecuador and Bolivia. He's provided aid to left-wing Colombian guerillas and he almost single-handedly props up Cuba's communist government. He does all that while proclaiming that he is democratically elected. Technically that is true because Venezuela has free elections. In reality, Chavez is an autocrat.

He wins votes by lavishly spending oil revenues to subsidize food, fuel and housing for most Venezuelans, Even so, his margin of victory was smaller than in the past. There's reason for that. Despite the lavish spending, many Venezuelans remain desperately poor and the economy is a mess. Moreover, life in Venezuela is scary. It has one of the world's highest murder rates -- far above that in Mexico, wrongly viewed as the murder capital of the hemisphere. Other crime, especially corruption, is rampant as well.

Sunday's election means Chavez will hold power for another six years, unless his health fails. That's a possibility. He's reportedly had two major surgeries, radiation and chemotherapy to treat cancer. Destabilizing as a healthy Chavez has been, it's possible that his demise could make the political-diplomatic situation in the Western Hemisphere even more difficult.

Filling the vacuum left by an ill or departed Chavez could prompt domestic upheaval and perhaps worse. That in turn could affect oil exports, a prospect that rightly concerns the United States, a major importer of Venezuelan oil, and a world that needs oil to prime its economy.

Chavez's election creates a dilemma for U.S. diplomats. Paying attention to him encourages him to act out. Ignoring him could lead to undesirable consequences. A wiser course is to pay enough notice to protect U.S. interests, but not so much that it gives him a greater sense of self-importance and power.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
nucanuck said...

Is Chavez really a bad guy?

It's true that Chavez has contempt for the US, but after the US tried to assassinate him early in his first term, after the US continuing funding of opposition within Venezuela, who could blame him. With the US doing every covert thing possible to make his life difficult, Chavez has every reason to keep the US at arm's length.

Whether or not we agree with his governing policies of free education and health care, subsidizing housing for the poor, and supporting like-minded governments in other countries...Chavez has shown that his heart is with the poor and his actions support that. How does that make him evil?

The Carter center has monitored Chavez's first two elections and reported that they were the fairest of any elections that they have ever monitored.

Venezuela doesn't need the US and the US has no inheirent right to Venezuelan oil. Soon, if we don't modify our interventionist policies, Venezuelan oil may not be available to the US. We don't need to approve of our trading partners' politics to conduct commerce with them. Who do we think we are?

There is a clear movement underway where South and Central American countries are trying to break free of US dominance. This is not a militant movement, but more of a yearning to be free of a harsh and exploitative master. We in the US need an attitude adjustment and begin to treat other nations as partners instead of vassel states. The world is moving away from us and it is plain to see...if we would only look.

October 11, 2012 at 1:05 a.m.
nucanuck said...

JonRoss is technically correct. It was Jimmy Carter who commented on the fairness of the Venezuelan elections and The Carter Center that monitored those elections.

Way to go,JonRoss. What a keen eye. Now do you have anything to contribute about the editorial? Surprise us with some erudition.

October 11, 2012 at 9:58 a.m.
nucanuck said...

JonRoss, you are promulgating unsubstantiated lies of the worst order. Have you no shame?

October 11, 2012 at 12:59 p.m.
Leaf said...

It's not nice to make fun of the mentally handicapped, nucanuck. Best to just ignore JonRoss.

October 11, 2012 at 4:10 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.