published Saturday, September 8th, 2012

We can't survive four more years and other letters to the editors

We can't survive four more years

To Editor Drew Johnson: You did a real disservice to your readers by your editorial on Aug. 30, "The Romney dilemma," by saying the Republicans should "throw" the election for this year and leave Obama for four more years, then look to 2016 for a "better" candidate. We cannot survive another four years with Obama, as anyone with any common sense should be able to see.

Romney is a smart, capable candidate and should be given a chance to save this country, with God's help. This president is sending us down the tubes. As in a political cartoon I saw, re-electing Obama would be like backing the Titanic up to hit the iceberg again.

I would cancel my subscription if there was another newspaper in this town. I should hope you will be more fair in future editorials as you belong on the "left" side of the paper. We have no conservative voice in your editorials anymore. As for the letter writer who wants Romney and Ted Nugent to go to Mars, if he thinks Obama is the best president we've had, he must have been on another planet himself these past four years. Obama makes even Jimmy Carter look good.


Governors right on more pre-k

Response to Free Press editorial, "Haslam wrong about pre-k" (Aug. 26). Actually Govs. Bredesen and Haslam got it right.

The editorial stated that "Before Haslam pours additional tax dollars into pre-k..., he needs to ask, 'who really benefits from pre-k?' The answer isn't children or taxpayers. It's the teachers union... ."

You're wrong about the value of early childhood education.

Research shows:

The most critical life skills are developed between 2 and 6 -- even more critical for children with disabilities.

Learning starts in infancy, long before formal education. From birth to 3, a child's brain begins its wiring for math, language, music and physical activity. If it doesn't receive age-appropriate stimulation, it is difficult to "re-wire itself" later.

Young children who are engaged have a foundation for positive outcomes in academics, behavior and reasoning skills.

Imagine our community if every person had been nurtured between birth and 5. Better people aren't just born; they develop over a lifetime by caring families and communities.

The conclusion that "If Haslam really wants what's best for children, he'll fight for less pre-k ..." should be that he'll fight for more pre-k, which is what he and Gov. Bredesen have been doing.

GERALD D. JENSEN, President & CEO, Siskin Children's Institute

Obama definitely not the best ever

This letter is in response to a letter stating that President Obama is the best president we've ever had and suggesting that we send Ted Nugent and Mitt Romney to Mars. My response to that is, "What planet have you been living on?" Twenty-eight-plus million out of work (according to the real unemployment rate, which includes unemployed, underemployed and discouraged workers), 4 million bankruptcies and 2.4 million home foreclosures, health insurance premiums up 13 percent, and an astronomically increased national debt under Obama's one term. Most of these statistics are taken from 2011, so how much worse is it now?

I saw a cartoon the other day that nailed it in comparison, best one I've seen yet: Re-electing Obama would be like backing the Titanic up to hit the iceberg for a second time. Romney is an excellent choice with impeccable credentials and experience to run against Obama.

Anybody who thinks Obama is the best president we've had is absolutely clueless. This is a dangerous election and the future of America depends on it. I certainly hope we don't gamble it away.


Bain improved pension plans

The president and his accomplices in the McMedia would have us believe that the inveterate profiteers at Bain Capital grew wealthy buying companies and firing the employees, trampling middle-class types like union workers, teachers and retirees along the way. Deroy Murdock's New York Post article, "Look Who Parks Their Cash at Bain," tells us that by rescuing failing companies and starting new ones the "Bain Crime family" enriched the pension plans of:

System, Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, Indiana Public Retirement System, Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System, Maryland State Retirement and Pension System, Employees' Retirement System of Nevada, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio, Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System, Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System, and the august Oprah Winfrey Foundation.

Murdock asks why would Demo-friendly government-union leaders and university presidents allow Bain to oversee their precious assets. Interesting question, indeed.


Who's in charge if Obamas gone?

One can only wonder who in the vacant office is running our government while the Obamas are on Air Force One to the next campaign speeches at taxpayer expense!


School disparities must be addressed

After seeing Tuesday's Times Free Press (Sept. 4) I began to wonder, "What's wrong with these pictures?"

The front page shows a large photograph of The Howard School's band practicing with beat-up equipment and a headline that read, "So long, duct tape." The article describes how hard Dexter Bell is working to get decent instruments for all his band members. No one should have to share instruments or pretend to play while marching.


On page one of Section D in the same day's paper is a picture of a young violinist from Chattanooga School for the Arts and Sciences surrounded by a least a dozen electric keyboards. Yes, I know CSAS is a magnet school, and I know the funding is different. I taught in public education over 30 years and I am aware that there is grant money, and that band booster parents spend countless hours selling concessions and conducting other fundraising activities so that their kids can have what they need. Perhaps the students at The Howard School don't yet have that level of support.

I suppose my point is this. What do these two pictures say about Hamilton County Schools? Does anyone else think this is a situation that needs to be addressed?


Move now to halt phone invasions

Millions of homes are invaded daily by telemarketers and political workers. We've been told if we place a request to the proper authorities, our phones won't be dialed by these intruders. Unfortunately, this isn't true.

We have some control over TV and Internet using the off/on switch -- not so with telephones. Many would dispense with our phone in preference to these daily intrusions except the phone is a necessity in some situations.

We possess the technology to eliminate this blight. Electronic gear can easily be manufactured for phone providers that will:

1. Allow homeowners to press a key(s) on his phone while the intruder makes his pitch that will send a message directly to a processing center.

2. The message can identify the intruder, time of the call, and phone number of the homeowner.

Every person owning a phone should be free to choose whether or not to participate.

In order for this to become a reality, a federal law will be needed, whereby fines can be assessed against violators. Also, fees can be required of telemarketers, etc., periodically for lists of phone numbers which aren't to be called.

A well-organized survey would, no doubt, convince Congress and the president that such a program is needed and wanted by the citizenry.


Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.

Hmm, two letters with similar themes and identical references. I wonder if we have people working in concert.

But here's a cartoon for you: Electing Mitt Romney would be like building another Hindenberg after the first one blew up.

September 8, 2012 at 1:32 a.m.
Livn4life said...

Hmm, what does it take for people to objectively look at facts over the last four years and conclude, we are on the right track, we will pull out if we re-elect the current president? Oh, the word objectively is the problem. Obama-amers look through jaded lenses of it has all been, is now and will always be someone else's fault even when facts show otherwise. Who's really objective when your own personal point is made by subjectivity?

September 8, 2012 at 5:02 a.m.
LibDem said...

JEAN HOLT, You will be relieved to learn that for several years now planes have been able to contact earth. President Bush remained airborne for some time after 9/11, but never out of communication. Or maybe you're just grasping for a complaint.

September 8, 2012 at 6:41 a.m.
Easy123 said...


"Oh, the word objectively is the problem. Obama-amers look through jaded lenses of it has all been, is now and will always be someone else's fault even when facts show otherwise."

Or maybe Republicans just like to skirt the blame for their obstructionism and the 8 years of Bush. Facts show Obama inherited a failing economy. Facts show Republicans have been hell-bent on doing anything and everything to make Obama fail. If you want to blame anyone for anything, blame yourself for being a misinformed, delusional, Bible-thumping Wingnut.

"Who's really objective when your own personal point is made by subjectivity?"

You should ask yourself that question.

September 8, 2012 at 8:35 a.m.
jesse said...

I think 4 more years of Obama will be less disastrous than 8 years of Romney, BUT we are in DEEP KIMCHEE no mater who wins!!

September 8, 2012 at 11:32 a.m.

It is difficult to vote for either. The Democratic Party has been called the 'Slaughter House' Party. This is because of the comparison with animal slaughter houses and infants being torn to pieces in their 'So-Called' Mother's wombs. Then, Mitt Romney serves a jesus that Christians do not recognize. Serving the wrong jesus equals serving the wrong god.

Below: Abortion Video...Democratic Party Video, Whatever!

September 8, 2012 at 5:44 p.m.
Easy123 said...


Everyone anti-abortionist uses those late term abortion pictures. The estimated number of late-term abortions in the United States: around 1,000. Sorry, but you always like to talk about "small minority populations" like atheists and agnostics, women that have late-term abortions are a tiny, tiny minority.

The Democratic Party has nothing to do with abortions. The Democratic Party supports a woman's right to choose. Democrat's don't encourage women to get abortions. Democrat's simply support the right of the woman to make that choice.

Again, you are ignorant to basic facts.

"The Democratic Party has been called the 'Slaughter House' Party."

And this is a complete and utter fabrication. Why do you try to make things up to suit your agenda? You made up a joke about homosexuals, a "quote" from Abraham Lincoln, your physics "credentials", and the "copyrighting" of a phrase.

You are a habitual liar.

September 8, 2012 at 8:22 p.m.

It's hyperbole meant to serve only as rhetorical emotion, but in reality, the real slaughterhouses are the result of Republican action. Who you know are opposed to any kind of health or other regulation to encourage more humane food practices.

Or just the institutional misery found in our jails. Not the executions, though those are bad enough, but the structure of our prisons. Just see their glee when they imagine how somebody will suffer in a prison.

And in reality, President Obama will prevent more abortions through contraceptive availability than any pointless Republican rergulations. They scream that banning guns won't work, don't they realize the same applies to abortions?

September 8, 2012 at 8:48 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.