published Thursday, September 13th, 2012

Chicago teachers fail

After over 25 years of relative peace, the Chicago Teachers Union and the City of Chicago are at odds, tangled in a wrestling match for higher wages, shorter working hours and changes to teacher evaluations. On Monday, the Chicago Teachers Union launched a city-wide strike. The CTU, "unable to reach an agreement" that would prevent the strike, has effectively shut down 675 schools and locked the doors on over 400,000 students in the greater Chicago area.

Many wonder on what grounds Chicago Public School teachers -- currently some of the highest-paid educators in the nation -- are pushing for a 30 percent pay raise over two years. When countered with an offer of a 16 percent raise over four years (worth over $400 million), the CTU refused.

In a city with a median annual salary of $48,886, the average CPS teacher rakes in over $76,000 a year -- not including their lavish benefits.

With 97 percent of health-care costs provided for, a salary higher than the majority of fellow public educators (and Chicagoans) and a retirement fund that is guzzling three quarters of all new education spending, Chicago educators clamoring for more is coming across as ridiculously greedy to city officials and many others around the country.

The CTU's plea for shorter working hours may seem like a reasonable enough request. After all, who wouldn't like to work less? But Chicago teachers are already working, by a wide margin, the least amount of hours in any large city school system in America, according to data gathered by CPS.

Chicago's school year is 57,120 minutes. New York, the next shortest school year among large metro areas, provides 61,110 minutes of student instruction per year. The national average for big city school districts is a 67,392 minutes school year. Philadelphia's teachers instruct for 70,590 minutes every year.

It seems more reasonable, in light of a high school graduation rate under 55 percent and with 79 percent of 8th graders reading far below the national average, that Chicago teachers would want to invest time more time in educating children, not less.

There is no doubt that working in the Chicago public school system has its difficulties. However, it is irresponsible and illogical for the striking CPS teachers to hold children hostage from the classroom, leaving them to meandering through Chicago's streets until their selfish insurgence is settled. The strike is also unfair to hardworking taxpayers, who cannot afford to superfluously pad the pockets of Chicago's teachers who already work fewer hours for more money, while producing worse results, than the almost all other teachers in America.

Rather than using students as a bargaining tool to try to get more, the Chicago Teachers Union would benefit from taking a look at the reality of their poor performance and their fortunate financial position and be thankful for what they already have.

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

In the last part of April around 15,000 union thugs in Illinois including teachers demanded the state legislature to "RAISE OUR TAXES!"

Insanity on display :

September 13, 2012 at 10:21 a.m.

It's funny, you keep making the same fallacious argument about average salaries.

You did it with EPB too.

Why is that? Are you trying to get us to resent the teachers pay? Wait, isn't tat class warfare?

September 13, 2012 at 6:42 p.m.
Walden said...

happy - back it up, don't just crap it out.

September 14, 2012 at 1:12 p.m.
Rickaroo said...

Thank god for good journalism. Unfortunately this article is NOT an example of it. Your blatantly slanted piece here, Mr. Editor, would have us believe that those selfish, "greedy" striking teachers are only concerned with lining their already fat pockets. But if you actually watched and listened to interviews with any of the striking teachers, you would notice that not one of them has ever talked about their pay. They are first and foremost concerned with things like over-crowded classrooms, lack of air conditioning, crumbling buildings, impractical and unfair top-down remedies (such as standardized testing) from outside the system as opposed to collaborative solutions from within, and funneling more and more tax dollars away from public education and into the charter schools. And if you were truly interested in thorough and fair journalism you would at least make mention of the fact that pay raises and benefits are the only things about which they can legally strike, so they are ham-strung into making it an issue, ostensibly, about higher wages.

Even if it were all about wages, it's funny how you think anybody making a middle-class wage or less and trying to collectively bargain for more pay or better working conditions is greedy and selfish; but the CEOs of Walmart and many other big box stores make millions and billions while 90% of their employees have to find supplemental income or file for Medicaid just to get by, and you praise the CEOs and the obscenely rich for being fine, upstanding examples of good ol' American ingenuity and free enterprise. Go figure.

Like bulbs said - class warfare? Just maybe...hmm?

September 14, 2012 at 1:36 p.m.

Walden, I've made a more extensive commentary on the subject elsewhere, and why it's a fallacious argument, you'll have to look it up yourself as I don't care to repeat it again.

Not that you really should have to do so, it's pretty obvious what an empty bit of reasoning it is, should it really take any expansion to recognize for what it is?

September 18, 2012 at 11:13 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.