published Monday, May 13th, 2013

Water feud between Alabama, Florida and Georgia plays out in Congress

  • photo
    Water is released into the Chattahoochee River from Lake Lanier at Buford Dam on Friday in Buford, Ga. A normally routine bill allowing the government to construct and manage river and harbor projects included a rule that could have threatened metro Atlanta's ability to take water from Lake Lanier on the Chattahoochee River.
    Photo by Associated Press /Chattanooga Times Free Press.

ATLANTA — The water dispute among Alabama, Florida and Georgia is provoking hardball politics in Congress, where Georgia lawmakers derailed a proposal that could restrict metro Atlanta's water supply.

A provision initially tucked into a water projects bill would make it harder for metro Atlanta and North Georgia communities to take drinking water from two federal reservoirs. That restriction in early drafts of the 2013 Water Resources Development Act effectively would undermine a court decision affirming Atlanta can use one of those reservoirs, Lake Lanier, for its water needs, a legal victory for Georgia and a setback for Alabama and Florida.

The proposed rule seems to be an attempt by Alabama and Florida to pressure Georgia into more serious negotiations. The appellate court ruling prevented an immediate water crisis for Atlanta and reduced the urgency for Georgia's leaders and increased their bargaining power. Georgia Sens. Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, both Republicans, said they reached an agreement last week to remove the restriction, though senators from Alabama and Florida want it restored.

A floor vote in the Senate could come as early as this week. The restrictions would have applied to all U.S. reservoirs but carried significant implications in the Southeast.

"We have always believed that this dispute must be solved at the state level, not in Washington," Chambliss and Isakson said in a statement.

Originally, the plan would have forced the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to seek congressional approval if a request for municipal or industrial water cumulatively changed by 5 percent or more the approved water storage plans for a federal reservoir.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., sought the original limits in the bill, said Brooke Sammon, a spokeswoman for Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. Shortly after Georgia's delegation reached a deal to strike the rule, Rubio introduced an amendment on behalf of the Alabama and Florida Senate delegations to restore it.

"Addressing and resolving this issue will end the economic havoc that decreased water flows have created for the Apalachicola Bay's once vibrant oyster industry, as well as all the other industries so dependent on the harvesting and sale of that great resource, and he will continue to make this a top priority until the issue is resolved," Sammon said.

Alabama's lawmakers have used their congressional clout to send signals before. In 2005, Sessions and Sen. Richard Shelby blocked the nomination of an Army official until they received a promise that the U.S. government would not change plans for operating river dams until the states resolved their dispute.

Alabama, Florida and Georgia have clashed for years over the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint river system, which serve all three states. Alabama and Georgia have also fought over a separate basin formed by the Alabama, Coosa and Tallapoosa rivers.

Georgia wants more water from Lake Lanier to serve the Atlanta region, arguing that Congress always intended the reservoir would supply at least part of the area's water needs. Alabama and Florida say metro Atlanta uses too much water upstream, resulting in low water flows downstream. They say the lack of water allows pollutants to concentrate in rivers, reduces the water supply for their businesses and residents, and harms wildlife.

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.