published Friday, January 10th, 2014

Cook: Now you see me, now you don't

It sounds so promising — video visitation for Hamilton County Jail inmates.

Not unlike Skype, prisoners and visitors could chat over Internet screens rather than face-to-face, with only shatterproof glass between them. Video monitors in the jail would link the incarcerated with family and friends on the outside who could reserve times to talk with inmates from laptops or phones anywhere.

No more long lines in the jail lobby. No more transporting dangerous inmates from one cell block, down the elevator, into the visitation room and back again.

It's also a money-maker: Folks would pay 60 cents for each minute of video visitation, a rate that would generate an estimated $60,000 in the first year and double that in the second and third. (Anyone who comes to the jail could video-chat for free; the 60-cent rate is charged for visits from places outside the building).

Sounds good, doesn't it?

Wednesday, the Hamilton County Commission will vote on accepting a proposal to install a video visitation system in the county jail.

And they should vote no.

Why?

Because the idea is a distraction -- the policy equivalent of changing the channel -- that encourages us to forget the real goal of incarceration.

It's not to make money off the incarcerated. The Florida company offering to install the video system would keep the first $42,000 made from video visits and then 70 percent annually thereafter while continuing to own the equipment.

Seventy percent is a racket, an extension of the prison industrial complex. Prisons and jails are supposed to correct and reform, not make millionaires out of corporate bosses who have no financial interest in ever, ever seeing the number of incarcerated do anything but grow.

Proponents of video visitation claim it will reduce long lines of family members wishing to see their locked-up loved ones. How about we instead figure out how to stop locking so many people up?

Video visitation furthers the isolation and withdrawal of prisoners from society. It turns prisoners and our county jail -- located in the heart of downtown -- into a virtual island that we can't physically access.

If you've ever visited someone in jail, you realize how deeply valuable this is. Mothers see sons and their bodies; how they walk, their scars, the light in their eyes and whether it's vanishing. Spouses are inches away from loved ones. Children put their hands to the glass as their fathers do the same from the other side.

Inmates with frequent visitors are less likely to re-offend, studies show.

"Inmates who were visited in prison had a 13 percent lower risk of recidivism than inmates who were not visited in prison," reads a Minnesota Dept. of Corrections report.

The U.S. Dept. of Justice even encourages inmate visitation, in order to "maintain the morale of the inmate and to develop closer relationships between the inmate and family members or others in the community," a policy document states.

It's true that such a video system could increase the frequency and number of inmate visits, which would increase morale and decrease the likelihood of re-offending. And if it saves money for the jail while keeping guards and prisoners safer and more secure, then good. Wonderful.

Just implement it partially. Hamilton County commissioners, keep some visitation booths open for face-to-face encounters; don't let video visitation become the only option people have.

Then tackle the larger issue: That the Hamilton County Jail has become our region's substitute mental health hospital.

A terrible number of inmates are classified as mentally ill, which is a drain on guards, expenses (medicine, for example) and bed space that should go to real criminals, not sick people.

So jail officials try and relocate them in appropriate health facilities. Sometimes they travel across the state to do so. Last month alone, jail employees transported 125 inmates to facilities near and far. (Five transports on Christmas Day alone). They drove more than 3,000 miles and logged 231 manhours doing so, Chief Deputy Allen Branum said.

That's not their job nor is it the jail's. You want to free up manpower, reduce guard stress, save money and restore the true aim of the Hamilton County jail (it's not to be a mental health hospital) then County Commission, begin to deal with this.

Contact David Cook at dcook@timesfreepress.com or 423-757-6329. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter at DavidCookTFP.

about David Cook...

David Cook is the award-winning city columnist for the Times Free Press, working in the same building where he began his post-college career as a sportswriter for the Chattanooga Free Press. Cook, who graduated from Red Bank High, holds a master's degree in Peace and Justice Studies from Prescott College and an English degree from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville. For 12 years, he was a teacher at the middle, high school and university ...

4
Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
twinkie1cat said...

The problem was elucidated. Why should the sheriff be allowed to make money off of the innocent families of prisoners? Makng people pay to see their family members is sick and cruel. This is wrong and is done all the time. Instead, if you want to lock people up, provide the budget to pay for it. Otherwise, only lock up people for violent crimes who are actually a danger to the public.

January 10, 2014 at 12:50 p.m.
sagoyewatha said...

If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.

January 10, 2014 at 6:43 p.m.
jjmez said...

Too bad the old deep digging investigative reporters are no longer around. It would be interesting to know if the elected officials and politicians or their family members or friends advodating this have stock options in these private companies cropping up. Such in the case of Florida Governor Rick Scott who wanted all welfare recipients drug tested and some savvy investigative reporters exposed he owned $62 million woth of shares in Solantic, a walk-in clinic chain that performs drug tests for $35 each. When exposed, what the old boy Rick do? He transferred those Solantic shares to his wife. Savvy old dawg wasn't he? ;)

January 10, 2014 at 8:35 p.m.
soakya said...

that's why you want government to do as little as possible? power corrupts.

January 11, 2014 at 12:41 a.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »

advertisement
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.