published Saturday, May 3rd, 2014

Light it up: Chattanooga needs to make good on its promise


Read the Times Free Press story on April 26: “Auditor: EPB partially at fault for green lighting fiasco.”

Chattanooga streetlight replacement audit
Chattanooga streetlight replacement audit

Mayor Andy Berke's administration has done a pretty good job over the past year of making a clean sweep in city government, but the city officials have one more stop to make: the city-owned and board-operated EPB.

And while Berke and his young whipper-snappers are at it, they need to put a bit more effort into making Chattanooga government not just more dollar efficient but also more energy efficient.

One needs look no further than the stalled installation of "smart lights" -- LED street lights -- in Chattanooga.

This excerpt from a recent Times Free Press report sums up the problem: "Asked by the City Council to sort out the protracted kerfuffle among EPB, Global Green Lighting and Chattanooga Mayor Andy Berke's administration, (City Auditor Stan) Sewell found that fuzzy maintenance figures, millions of dollars in ongoing charges and a $5 million 'billing discrepancy' introduced by EPB were the primary drivers behind the high price of replacing the city's 26,551 streetlights."

Originally, the replacement of all of Chattanooga's high-pressure sodium streetlights with new LED bulbs was priced at $18 million. At that price, the deal would have saved taxpayers millions of dollars over the long run.

The city signed a contract with Global Green to replace about a third of Chattanooga's street lights for about $6 million. The council would have the option in coming years to approve replacement of the final two thirds.

That was before administration officials, operating in part from faulty EPB figures, added millions more in charges to the light replacement cost projections and energy use estimates, including an ongoing EPB maintenance fee and a "stranded assets" fee for lights taken down before the end of their useful lives, not to mention standard add-ons like interest and installation charges.

Those costs, coupled with a claim from EPB that the lights were unreliable, caused the city to ask Global Green for an expensive 15-year warranty on the lights, resulting in a total $27.5 million price tag.

But Global Green fought back, showing council members the company's own figures from the first 4,400 lights installed. Those lights "phone home" with reports about their status, efficiency and usage to Global Green's monitoring office. The conflicting claims prompted the council to ask Sewell to sort it out.

Sewell's audit found that maintenance figures reported by EPB -- which suggested that 20 percent of the new lights had required some type of repair or replacement -- were incorrect. EPB's data included duplicate reports, activation jobs, pole resets and other minor work orders. The real number of faulty lights. was much lower.

Global Green was also partially vindicated on its lights' energy savings. EPB's estimate -- again made on faulty EPB inventories and monitoring -- was 60 percent. Sewell found the actual figure will come closer to 68.8 percent.

Here's the bottom line. The new lights, according to Sewell, would cut the city's use of street light power by nearly 70 percent, and the lights -- warranted for 13 years but expected to last significantly longer than that -- would pay for themselves in 13.2 years. What other city service pays for itself ever, let alone in 13 years?

EPB would lose revenue on maintenance, and TVA would lose power sales. Chattanooga would save money in the long run and reduce its carbon footprint. That's savings and cleaner air and a hedge on climate change for Chattanoogans, in addition to safer street lights that police can control from their cars. The lighting connections can also be used for warning systems, air monitors and security cameras. The possibilities are only just beginning to be clear.

The decision for Chattanooga is one of capital expenditure and image. Another $12 million to replace all the lights is a big chunk out of the city's roughly $30 million capital improvements budget.

The city, touting its commitment to being "sustainable," in 2012 gave Global Green owner Don Lepard a handshake promise to make the remaining light replacements, and Lepard moved his light making factory from China to Chattanooga, first employing about 60 people and expecting to employ 250 as the city finished its project.

With the project stalled, Lepard has 5,000 lights in inventory and 60 laid-off workers.

Chattanooga is run by smart people, these days. Surely they can find a way to honor their predecessors' commitment, save our dollars, save our energy, save our ozone and straighten out EPB. And, by the way, what ever happened to making city offices more energy efficient?

Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
homefree77 said...

Re. Bryan College I'd like to give my thoughts on the Bryan College debate. Only Christianity of all religions gives a guarantee of eternal life. Jesus said, "He that believes on Me, though he were dead, yet shall he live." Again He said, "No one comes to the Father except by Me." The Bible said, "There is no other name given among men whereby we must be saved other than the name of Jesus." The only person to claim to have come from Heaven and proved it by being raised from the grave, was Jesus. He was also the only person to die for mankind and state that this was the reason He allowed men to kill him. He said, "No man takes my life from me, I give it up freely." You either believe His testimony, or you don't. To mingle man's explanation for our existence with Jesus' authoritative words on the subject is useless. He alluded to His own knowledge of creation when He said concerning marriage, "From the beginning (Genesis) it was intended there be male and female. (Mark 10:5) So he is stating the Genesis account of creation is factual. Furthermore, His death on the cross would be useless for all mankind if man had not come from a single man, namely Adam. The reason, is that Adam's sin made all humans including himself, unfit to enter Heaven. This is called being a sinner. The single death of one flawless man, Jesus, could pay for the sins of all those who put their faith in Him and repent of their sins. If we didn't all come from the body of Adam, including Eve, then it would require a death for every individual ever born to redeem us from our sins. This is the reason why Satan and a third of all the angels who followed him and sinned against God cannot be redeemed. They cannot procreate themselves. They were created individually so it would require one death for each individual angel. Jesus would have to die on the cross possibly millions of times for all the angels. This would also be the requirement for man's redemption if we were not from a single man, Adam. So to dismiss Genesis as a figurative story that didn't literally happen is to leave mankind with no way out of our condemnation. It all boils down to one thing, God wants us to believe what He says is True. We will all believe Him when we stand before Him in judgment but it will be too late for most of us. Believing Him on this side of the grave is the only way to escape hell. The main reason people argue with the Bible is they want to hold on to their sins. This is the real problem. I hope this helps to resolve this issue in some people's minds. Wayne Meyer North Chattanooga

May 4, 2014 at 4:45 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.