published Sunday, May 4th, 2014

Orange Grove is a model for care and other letters to the editors

Orange Grove is a model for care

A recent article regarding expensive solutions for serving people with intellectual disabilities limited its focus to state and federal funding and legal battles that shaped the system. The promising news is that community organizations like Orange Grove Center have addressed hardships for citizens with intellectual disabilities long before the state, the federal government or the court system noticed the need. Orange Grove was established in 1953 when Tennessee did not have a community-funded service. Orange Grove led the way in establishing a statewide service that leverages community investment with state and federal funds to provide the most economical and practical approach to serving our most vulnerable citizens. Today, Orange Grove is one of the most cost-efficient models of community services for those on the broad spectrum of developmental disabilities in the nation. With scholarship funds for people without funding and advocacy for those on bureaucratic waiting lists, Orange Grove successfully partners with the city, Hamilton County, United Way of Greater Chattanooga and surrounding counties in providing person-centered and practical modalities of care.


Appreciating the Scenic City

I’ve lived in Chattanooga many years. In spring, I visit the Barn Nursery, and each year it is always upgraded and improved. This spring was spectacular with paved walk areas and more covered spaces. The plants are unequaled. It is truly delightful to experience. I have been privileged to attend symphony performances at the beautiful Tivoli. The restorations of some of the old buildings are wonderful — just seeing them come back to life. Recently, Shallowford Road was completed to Jenkins. With nice smooth pavement, storage lanes and sidewalks, it is pleasant to drive. Besides bridges, mountains, rivers and trains, there is much to appreciate in my home town.


Fleenor deserves your vote

I am writing in support of Pam McNutt Fleenor for Chancellor, Part 1. I have known Pam professionally and personally since the mid-1980s and have seen the manner in which Pam has comported herself with clients, opposing counsel and judges. Pam exemplifies professionalism and advocacy. She is by far the most qualified person for the position of chancellor, Part I based on her actual experience and behavior in Chancery Court. May I also set forth the following for consideration: Chattanooga lawyers preferred Pam almost three to one over her opponent in the bar poll. Pam is the only candidate for chancellor who has the endorsement of retired Supreme Court Chief Justice Mickey Barker. Pam is the only candidate for Chancellor who has the endorsement of former County Mayor Claude Ramsey, a staunch conservative Republican. Pam also has the editorial endorsement of both the Chattanooga Times and Free Press. I urge you to vote for Pam as she is the most qualified based on the above.


Wage fallacy doesn’t compute

I would like to thank your cartoonist, Mr. Clay Bennett, for his contribution in the April 16 edition about Mrs. Goodbar. His offering illustrates a long and deeply held injustice with the economy. I am assuming he is pointing out that Mr. Goodbar is exactly the same as Mrs. Goodbar, except that Mrs. Goodbar costs less. Also, I am assuming that he is correlating this with the notion that women doing equal work as men are only paid 77 percent as much. Assuming all things being equal with the candy bars except price and all things being equal with labor except price, my question would be why would anyone buy a Mr. Goodbar or hire a man in the first place. That is, until the others have been sold out. The Mrs. Goodbars and the female work force should be highly sought-after while their counterparts are left “on the shelf.” This 77 percent fallacy does not pass the economic sniff test. All things being equal, I will choose the less expensive every time.

DWAYNE CORVIN, Pikeville, Tenn.

Manuel for chancellor

We are voting for Joe Manuel for chancellor. We have known Joe several years, meeting him first at the Hamilton County Pachyderm Club, where he served as president. He served during a time when he had to find a new space for our weekly meetings and he guided us through that turmoil to a very satisfactory location that he referred to as “Our House,” and that name has stayed. We have seen Joe preside at the weekly meetings, being sure all speakers and/or candidates had equal time to express their views. We have witnessed his compassion and concern for his clients, especially helping an elderly lady downsize her possessions by taking her antiques to several stores to be purchased for resale. Joe has strong values, and he possesses the temperament to be chancellor along with knowledge of the law. He has many years’ experience as a mediator and arbitrator. We trust Joe Manuel to avoid emotional decisions and to apply the law to guide him to the most appropriate outcome. Join us in voting for Joe Manuel for chancellor.


Vote Epperson for register of deeds

I have known Ryan Epperson approximately nine years. He has served this county as a member of the Army National Guard and has been serving the citizens of this county for years as a member of the Hamilton County sheriff’s office. He has the ability and knowledge to be a successful register of deeds. He has told me and others he would seek to better equip the office with technology that would save the taxpayers money while allowing the staff to be more effective and efficient. He has promised to make sure that the register’s office is implementing countywide personnel policies and has promised no discrimination will take place under his watch. Ryan Epperson is by far the best candidate and deserves your vote. Please join me in voting for Ryan Epperson for register of deeds.


Please save the hemlocks

One of the major ecological concerns of our century is deforestation. It occurs in places like the Congo and Amazon as well as in the Pacific Northwest, where millions of acres of clear cuts scar the landscape. But did you know there is deforestation occurring here in the Tennessee Valley on an unprecedented scale? Not only are far too many acres of forest and hillsides falling to traffic-inducing suburban development, but we also are losing much of the biodiversity within our forests. A major loss continues to be the eastern hemlock, which is falling prey to an insect accidentally introduced to the United States called the hemlock woolly adelgid. At several colleges in the Southeast (including UT Knoxville), there are labs that are rearing beetles to prey on the adelgid to help restore our hemlock stands. I would like to see Chattanooga-area colleges and universities start their own beetle labs so we do not lose this wonderful tree that graces and protects many a waterfall and stream bank among the Cumberland Mountains.


Front page skips Easter?

What a disappointment to see the Sunday, April 20, front page highlighting technology, the mayor, and the union and ignoring what millions consider the pivotal day in all of human history. Not a word! What a telling indication of what you at the paper consider vital and important. I feel certain I am not alone in noticing and lamenting this huge blunder. Thanks though, to Mallard Fillmore, my favorite duck, for his astute observation in the Sunday comics. He noted, “For God so loved the world, he gave his only son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life.” Thanks, Mallard!


Comments do not represent the opinions of the Chattanooga Times Free Press, nor does it review every comment. Profanities, slurs and libelous remarks are prohibited. For more information you can view our Terms & Conditions and/or Ethics policy.
conservative said...

I think DWAYNE CORVIN, Pikeville, Tenn is saying that if it is true that women are paid only 77% of what men are paid then why hire men at all?

Why hire a man when you can get a woman to do the job for 23% less?

Liberals/Demoncrats have a long record trying to sell outrages lies.

May 4, 2014 at 8:57 a.m.
conservative said...

MARGARET THORNTON, Calhoun, Ga. the paper is very Liberal and is dominated by Liberal/Atheist opinion.

Just note the Liberal/Atheist commenters and comments which will soon appear here.

May 4, 2014 at 9:06 a.m.
Rickaroo said...

Ta-da! I seem to have the honor of being the first atheist commenter here today. Thank you for the introduction, con-man.

Regarding Margaret Thornton's letter: Funny thing about John 3:16. It is probably the most oft' quoted verse in the Bible. Christians like to quote it to believer and non-believer alike because they think that it shows the profound and unconditional love of the heavenly father for his children. It could well be considered the very foundation on which all of Christianity is built. But if one actually thinks about it and doesn't just mouth the words in overblown emotion, it is obvious that verse should nullify their faith, not substantiate it.

Think about it. God, who is omniscient, already knows the outcome of his "Divine Plan" that is still supposedly unfolding; and he knew well before he even planted his seed in the womb of Mary, only to pop out as Jesus in a manger and walk the earth for 33 years, exactly how that part of his "Divine Plan" was going to play out. In other words, he KNEW, without any doubt whatsoever, that Jesus was not going to really die but was only going to take a brief slumber in a cave and then would arise looking all shiny and new, ready to be transported to God's heavenly domain, where he would have his son at his side for all eternity. So, pray tell, where was the sacrifice?! A real sacrifice would have been for God to have literally given his son up forever, without hope of seeing him again. But if he knew he was going to get him back in a very brief time...where was the sacrifice?

Certainly, hanging on a cross for a couple of days is no picnic, but there have been untold hundreds of millions of people throughout the ages who have suffered far worse than that. And there have been untold hundreds of millions of parents who have lost their beloved children, without any assurance, other than their blind faith and the hope of being reunited with them in a supposed afterlife, that they will ever see them again. They have had to endure living out the rest of their lives suffering from the agony of their loss.

It is obvious that the whole show about Jesus coming to earth for the express purpose of dying for our sins was only a grand charade, a part of God's "Divine Plan" consisting of pomp and circumstance and having no substance. If God truly wanted to "save" us from our imperfections (after making us imperfect in the first place) he could have come up with something much more sane and sensible than going through the motions of a blood sacrifice and pretending to have given up his "only begotten son." Right now his only begotten is sitting him with him all comfy and cozy in paradise. So, again...where's the sacrifice?

May 4, 2014 at 10:24 a.m.
LibDem said...

Wait a minute, Rickaroo. Are you suggesting that Jesus knew this was just a weekend gig? He's not really the patch to fix the flawed design?

May 4, 2014 at 4:11 p.m.
LibDem said...

On a more somber and alarming note, SCOTUS has approved Christian prayers at council meetings.

May 5, 2014 at 12:29 p.m.
Rickaroo said...

"A weekend gig." That's a good way of putting

May 5, 2014 at 1:38 p.m.
please login to post a comment

videos »         

photos »         

e-edition »


Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.