Tennessee: Ramsey accuses Holder of 'lobbying'

Tennessee: Ramsey accuses Holder of 'lobbying'

April 17th, 2009 by Andy Sher in Local Regional News

NASHVILLE - Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey questioned Thursday whether Tennessee Supreme Court Chief Justice Janice Holder violated judicial ethics rules by saying she was "lobbying" to keep the current plan for selecting state Supreme Court and appellate judges.

"I guess it bothers me now when we have Supreme Court justices going across the state, putting politics back into this," Lt. Gov. Ramsey, R-Blountville, told reporters. "I know Janice Holder was down, I think, in Memphis this week saying that we shouldn't be electing judges.

"I don't know exactly how far that goes and still be ethical, to be honest, for them to be out here speaking to Rotary clubs and Kiwanis clubs lobbying for a bill," he said. "That seems to be against their code of ethics. Maybe it's not. But it seems to me that it almost crosses the line."

Article: Judicial races have little opposition, few surprises

Article: Steelman, Sell win judgeships


Under current law, the governor fills vacancies on the Tennessee Supreme Court, Tennessee Court of Appeals and Court of Criminal Appeals from three nominees chosen by the 17-member Judicial Selection Commission. The governor can reject nominees but must select from a second panel of nominees forwarded by the commission. Once on the bench, the appointed judge's name is put on the ballot for a simple yes/no retention vote at the next statewide election.

Chief Justice Holder was quoted by the Memphis Flyer this week as "vigorously" defending the so-called Tennessee Plan. The 1994 plan did away with competitive elections for the Supreme Court and replaced them with a system in which a judicial selection commission screens all appellate judicial candidates and forwards a slate of nominees to governors who must pick from their recommendations.

Once on the bench, according to the plan, appellate judges later are evaluated and subject to yes/no retention elections.

Republicans including Lt. Gov. Ramsey, who is Senate speaker, have questioned the constitutionality of the plan, which was upheld by two special Supreme Courts. Last year, Senate Republicans held up renewing the system, which is scheduled to expire after June 30.

Chief Justice Holder, a Republican appointee who previously has expressed support for the Tennessee Plan, said in a statement she has done nothing improper in rushing to its defense.

While she said she appreciates Lt. Gov. Ramsey's efforts on the issue, the chief justice noted "Canon 4 of the Code of Judicial Conduct specifically permits, and even encourages, judges to speak out on issues involving the law, the legal system or the administration of justice, just as I was doing when I addressed my own Kiwanis Club this week."

She said she looks forward to working with Lt. Gov. Ramsey and others "to reach a solution to the judicial selection issue that serves the best interests of the public and the persons who have business in Tennessee's courts."

Former state Supreme Court Chief Justice William "Mickey" Barker, of Signal Mountain, a Republican appointee who retired last fall, said while the code bans discussions of pending litigation, it "encourages judges to speak up on behalf of the judicial system."

"And so it's not a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct to speak up on behalf of what you think, as a judge, improves or enhances or keeps a fair and impartial judiciary in this country," he said.

The retired chief justice said he "absolutely" backs the current system. He said partisan, contested elections have turned into special interest-funded battles in states such as Alabama.

Lt. Gov. Ramsey, who actively is exploring a gubernatorial bid, said he believes the judicial retention elections are the best route but he questions the system's constitutionality, as has a Vanderbilt University law professor.