BRUSSELS - President Trump's dismissive treatment of Europe is beginning to erode the trans-Atlantic alliance, which for many decades has been the central pillar of U.S. national-security policy.
The growing European-American rift may be the most important but least discussed consequence of Trump's foreign policy. His disruptive style is usually seen as destabilizing distant adversaries in Pyongyang, Tehran and Beijing. But the diplomatic bombs have also been exploding here in the capital of the European Union - as well as in Paris, Berlin and London - and they appear to be causing real damage.
David IgnatiusMany European leaders have stopped being polite about Trump. After a year and a half of intermittent skirmishes, they've started firing back - describing Trump as a danger to Europe's security interests and moving toward an open break with Washington on Iran and other key issues.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel said this month that Trump's assault on the Iran deal had created a "real crisis" for the global order. French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said unilateral U.S. imposition of sanctions as "economic policeman of the planet" is "not acceptable."
The NATO military alliance still seems relatively solid. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg tweeted after visiting Trump Thursday that it was a "good meeting" and credited the president's "leadership on defense spending." But how long can this defense amity continue if there's an open break on major diplomatic issues?
The Europeans took an important symbolic step away from the U.S. last week when representatives of Germany, France and Britain join Russia and China in a meeting of the joint commission that oversees the Iran nuclear agreement.
European officials say they don't feel comfortable siding with Russia, China and Iran against the U.S., but that the Trump administration's withdrawal from the deal has given them no alternative. Europeans see the agreement as vital for their national security.
Europeans scrambled last week to reassure Iran and keep it in the deal partly because they don't want to jeopardize its monitoring provision. Under the current inspection regime, cameras record 2 million digital images a day at key sites in Iran, says one official. Thanks to the deal, estimates this official, Iran's breakout time to build a bomb has stretched from a few weeks to a year.
The U.S.-European confrontation will deepen if Washington, as expected, imposes secondary sanctions against European companies that do business with Iran. If so, Europe might retaliate with "blocking regulations" that punish companies that comply with the American measures.
Trump is so unpopular in Europe that defying him carries little political risk. On issues such as trade, climate change, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and global economic policy, the traditional centrist policy consensus has mostly held in Europe.
The trans-Atlantic divide on culture and values, once the bedrock of the alliance, is striking. Trump, with his braggadocio and vulgarity, seems almost a caricature of a rough, violent America that many Europeans dislike. A poll last year by the Pew Research Center found that only 11 percent of Germans, for example, trusted Trump to do the right thing, compared with 86 percent for his predecessor, Barack Obama.
Americans have taken European support for granted so long that few analysts have examined what a real breach in the trans-Atlantic alliance would look like. Maybe it's time to consider the "what ifs."
Trump has often said that "America First" doesn't mean "America alone." But Europe gets a vote on that, too, and this week it was resoundingly negative.
Washington Post Writers Group