How come nobody commenting here seems have read the article? The bridge in question is a PEDESTRIAN bridge. That means NO CARS. So, the concerns about dangerous drivers and slow pedicabs causing traffic congestion are irrelevant.
How come nobody commenting here seems have read the article? The bridge in question is a PEDESTRIAN bridge. That means NO CARS. So, the concerns about dangerous drivers and slow pedicabs causing traffic congestion are irrelevant.
Regulations kill a dream
How come nobody commenting here seems have read the article? The bridge in question is a PEDESTRIAN bridge. That means NO CARS. So, the concerns about dangerous drivers and slow pedicabs causing traffic congestion are irrelevant.
Dylboz
How come nobody commenting here seems have read the article? The bridge in question is a PEDESTRIAN bridge. That means NO CARS. So, the concerns about dangerous drivers and slow pedicabs causing traffic congestion are irrelevant.