As I understand, a complaint was made by a call. So, using your thinking, with better things to do, Police should ignore some complaints. Sounds exactly like what kept 3 women locked in a house in Cleveland, Ohio for 10 years. They had more important laws to enforce.
Madame, There's a difference between an even-handed application of standards and regulations and targeting. The IRS admitted to tareting Jewish groups, the Tea Party-like organizations, and those teaching the Constitution.
It's great to see you stand proudly as the political leftist that you are that despises America's foundation.
"What difference does it make" if the Justice Dept sells weapons to Mexican Cartel? if the IRS targets Jewish groups & constitutional groups? if the Dept of Justice monitors the phone records of the Associated Press? if the Dept of Agriculture pays billions of dollars to farmers never meeting criteria for discrimination in the Pigford farming suit? if a terrorist attack is called "workplace violence" at Fort Hood?....What does it matter? It matters because one man has been the most corrupt president and you all keep defending him.
Whether it's information before the attacks in Benghazi, during the attacks that were watched live by drone, or afterward, there was a deliberate effort to blame anything other than Islamic terrorists. The scandal is more about allowing events to get to such a boiling point and then covering it up.
Again, you're defense is to keep the focus off of the scandal during an election year that protects Obama, Hillary and the terrorists.
I appreciate your defense of jailing a film maker to cover up terrorists' actions. Thanks for your honesty.
Having four family members in the military in the last 10 years I hear firsthand the commitment of never leaving fellow military members behind.
Exactly how do Obama supporters define a scandal and a cover up?
The facts are out and the disgrace of bad decisions were covered up by blaming a video instead of the terrorists that they knew, they knew were attacking Benghazi.
I get it. You take the same approach that Hillary did. "What difference does it make?!"
Mrs. Smith is 100% accurate in all that she printed. The majority of commenters just attack the messenger because you can't refute the truth.
The Barack Obama administration is worse than anything you ever dreamed about accusing George Bush of doing. Pure corruption.
Marriage pictures Christ as the Groom and the Church, his believers, as the bride. So Christ would never leave his bride. The way I've been taught and read the Bible is that the remarriage causes adultery and is the sexual sin.
I believe I'm going to take the advice of the young man who just commented. God knows my heart and how very amazed I have been in reading such hatred toward his teaching.
I'll keep on praying about what I've seen today and for a time that we can understand that God sincerely loves us but He doesn't allow intentional, constant sin.
Divorce is not banned in the Bible.
What I've learned in reading this article and the comments is pretty simple. We don't really care what the Bible says these days because it exposes our sins. Those are the sins that held Jesus on the cross. Instead of admitting our failure, we attack anyone with enough guts to stand up.
I am a sinner saved by grace. I am also going to say the same thing about any sin that God does, whether it's homosexuality, lying, cheating, all of the sins. But, attacking someone else for my sins is no answer.
As I posted this morning, the argument is with what "Robin Smith says". But this lady is saying what God says and continues to say through Jesus His Son.
I guess I'm trying to say, it's easy to take aim at a person who disagrees with you but it's dangerous to argue with God.