Again, "spewed", "shout" - Individuals who run on anger just don't get too far. Good luck.
Hey, pitchfork toters, daytondarwin's ready for your ranks, if not ready to lead. Anger, anger, hate, hate.
This article will be shared in our staff meeting this afternoon, along with these comments. I'll also include one of my favorite author's quotes to prove my point: "Anger is an acid that can do more harm to the vessel in which it is stored than to anything on which it is poured."
The angry on the far left, the far right and those who are just miserable fit Mark Twain's description.
Funny, daytondarwin, It seems you fall into the "we've all seen the angry and disenchanted." I'll be at a large business on Riverside Drive today. What will you achieve today or any day? I guess the critic works on anger while the rest of us make the world work. Sad.
It's obvious that the denial and the lack of cooperation by the Obama Administration is all about covering up their crimes.
If any individual in a leadership or supervisory capacity ever developed an "enemies' list" and used such tactics, they would face criminal and civil charges.
In the case of the Obama Administration, it's both deliberate targeting and incomeptent management. But both led to the same outcome, harming those who stand in the way of a thug mentality.
Americans deserve to see each one of these folks go to jail and pay restitution. Let's see justice.
As I understand, a complaint was made by a call. So, using your thinking, with better things to do, Police should ignore some complaints. Sounds exactly like what kept 3 women locked in a house in Cleveland, Ohio for 10 years. They had more important laws to enforce.
Madame, There's a difference between an even-handed application of standards and regulations and targeting. The IRS admitted to tareting Jewish groups, the Tea Party-like organizations, and those teaching the Constitution.
It's great to see you stand proudly as the political leftist that you are that despises America's foundation.
"What difference does it make" if the Justice Dept sells weapons to Mexican Cartel? if the IRS targets Jewish groups & constitutional groups? if the Dept of Justice monitors the phone records of the Associated Press? if the Dept of Agriculture pays billions of dollars to farmers never meeting criteria for discrimination in the Pigford farming suit? if a terrorist attack is called "workplace violence" at Fort Hood?....What does it matter? It matters because one man has been the most corrupt president and you all keep defending him.
Whether it's information before the attacks in Benghazi, during the attacks that were watched live by drone, or afterward, there was a deliberate effort to blame anything other than Islamic terrorists. The scandal is more about allowing events to get to such a boiling point and then covering it up.
Again, you're defense is to keep the focus off of the scandal during an election year that protects Obama, Hillary and the terrorists.
I appreciate your defense of jailing a film maker to cover up terrorists' actions. Thanks for your honesty.
Having four family members in the military in the last 10 years I hear firsthand the commitment of never leaving fellow military members behind.
Exactly how do Obama supporters define a scandal and a cover up?
The facts are out and the disgrace of bad decisions were covered up by blaming a video instead of the terrorists that they knew, they knew were attacking Benghazi.
I get it. You take the same approach that Hillary did. "What difference does it make?!"