GaussianInteger's comment history

GaussianInteger said...

"Don't mess up their little minds with facts."

You never cite facts. Only GOP talking points.

November 20, 2014 at 12:06 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"Guass, again with the Koch brothers, you must be an MSNBC watcher.

And Zuckerberg, Soros and the like don't toss around their money to influence and make a profit?"

I rarely mention the guys (I don't think I have ever previously on this forum). But Fairmon was tossing around Warren Buffett. Why didn't you take the time to scold him?

"Profit bad, profit bad, profit bad."

Who said that? Again, Fairmon was criticizing Buffett because he profits from the transportation of the oil. Do you only selectively choose things to post about, ignoring the fact that I was simply offering a retort to Fairmon's contention?

November 20, 2014 at 9:54 a.m.
GaussianInteger said...

Hey Fairmon, you continuously accuse us that are against the building of the pipeline of being duped by Warren Buffett. There is a flip side to that coin. The Koch brothers own a couple of million acres in Alberta and stand to profit substantially from the completion of the pipeline. By your reasoning, those that support this pipeline have been duped by the Koch family.

November 19, 2014 at 7:33 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"So, young people are forced to buy healthcare they don't want or need so that the older and unhealthy can have their plan at reduced costs."

You're on Medicare, why do you even care?

November 19, 2014 at 4:53 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"Executive Order coming tomorrow from The Uniter, Not Divider."

He has offered House Republicans a chance to present a plan. What is the likelihood of them having any sort of plan other than erecting a giant, effin' wall along the border? The Senate passed a bi-partisan bill months ago and House Republicans refused to even debate it. This seems like a perfect reason for an Executive Order.

November 19, 2014 at 4:07 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"Lower prices at the pump because of increasing production and reducing dependency on foreign oil."

A pipeline pumping sands oil from a foreign country to the US is going to "reduce dependency on foreign oil"? Makes perfect sense to me.

November 19, 2014 at 4:03 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"It makes the dems/libs look completely extreme..which they are."

How so? There are plenty of Conservatives in Nebraska that oppose the Keystone Pipeline more than any "dems/libs". Of course, that's always overlooked by clowns like you. The risks of running a pipeline through the largest aquifer in the US has nothing to do with Global warming.

Inquiringmind posed a question at 10:32 about the benefits. Not one of you die-hard supporters has provided even one.

November 19, 2014 at 1:06 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"As I said, there is no organized study at a university on "climatology.""

Oh really, Timbo?

"According to the U.S. National Center for Education Statistics, there are over 60 colleges and universities around the nation that have programs in climatology or atmospheric science (www.nces.ed.gov).">

GaussianInteger said...

"As far as I know the raw data is available. Is there anything in climate science that is being withheld from public view?"

Nope. Of course, the deniers think it's a big conspiracy meant to drive up the cost of fuel and hurt small business.

November 18, 2014 at 2:36 p.m.
GaussianInteger said...

"It is already being transported by rail which is much more risky and costly."

"Costly"? Maybe. "Risky"? That is an unsubstantiated claim.

November 18, 2014 at 12:07 p.m.
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.