ConMan, post that church name, big guy. I'll bet you any amount of money I'll be a member there within the next few days. If it's a "true church" and so selective in their membership, what's there to worry about?
"so they come here and will vote for Democrats because the Democrats promise them a bunch of stuff and attack the wealthy. Vicious cycle. So easy to fall for demagogues."
You're ignorant. Illegals can't vote, so please explain how the "will vote for Democrats". "Fall for demagogues"? You need to look in the mirror, dude. You have fallen into the bottomless pit of demagogues.
Al, if the minister knew ConMan was stiffing the collection plate, they would kick him out in a New York minute.
"Yet, not one liberal would be OK with a home invader breaking into their home and having that invader declare it to be their home, and take possession of their stuff."
This must be hovering around on conservative talk radio/websites because some of my Facebook friends have posted similar nonsense. It's not the same Fister, not the same.
"There is not a chance that Mr. Anthony Provancher, a known anti Christ would be allowed membership in my church."
BULLSH!T!!! I'll pose the same challenge, post your church's name and guaranteed I'll be a full-fledged member by noon tomorrow. I'll even sit next to you on Sunday. We'll handle snakes, do shots of turpentine, do some gay-bashing, drop a hundred off in the collection plate, and then head off to the Golden Corral for the "All-You-Can-Eat". But you're too scared to post it because you know deep down in places you don't like to talk about, I'm right.
"Gaussianinteger, real friends do not expect you to adopt their political views. I would not change support of a candidate for a friend. Would you change your political views to match your friends? just asking."
You are being disingenuous with your apples to oranges comparison and lack of major details. No "I would not change support of a candidate for a friend". However, there's no way in hell I would publicly endorse a candidate (on more then one occasion, mind you) that slandered someone I consider a "friend". One can only gather that perceived political agendas come second to friendships for you. It has to be a miserable existence for anyone that considers you a "friend".
"Gauss, of course I support Chuck Fleishmann you idiot, supporting Chuck Fleishmann does not preclude a friendship or like Robin Smith"
With friends like you, April, who needs enemies? Again, I guess you forget all of the embarrassment Chuck and Chip caused for Robin and her family in 2010. I'm sure you're at the top when Robin thinks of her besties.
"It simply says you support the party that you think will best protect that on which you must depend. It also says I don't blame you although I don't think they are truly acting in the best interest of those truly in need."
That's BS and a GOP strawman, and you know it. I have voted Democrat in plenty of elections and I have not (other then the Montgomery GI Bill) and do not expect the people I vote for to give me some sort of handout. Despite your insistence to regurgitate GOP talking points, plenty of Democrats are wealthy, middle-class, or self-sufficient. There are also plenty of Republicans on welfare, SS, etc. It's a non-intellectual argument that holds no water. So please, give it a rest.
ConMan attends a "true church", yet, he won't tell anyone what constitutes a "true church". Salvation to him is like an initiation into an elite country club, of course, he believes he has an invitation waiting for him to arrive any day in his mailbox. Truly a hopeless case and a clear example of what thousands of years of religious bickering and perceived biblical superiority gets you.
Jack, it helps if you read the entire comment:
"ConMan and the rest of those worthless fanatics"