Cora- by all means, protect them! Give them your number so that when they need to pay an emergency visit to the doctor or pick up medicine or pay for a car repair that wasn't in their payday to payday budget- YOU can loan them the money! Glad to see you step up! Or- did you mean by protecting them- we take away their options so they can't go to the emergency room, pay for a prescription or fix their car? Exactly what is your idea of "protection"?
I guaranty you that people that vote against payday loans have never had to have one! I mean, if you have used the service- you certainly wouldn't be against it right? So, how about we ask the people that are affected by it- the customers.
Are we serious? We are talking about another regulation that takes choices away from people that already don't have many options? Is it better to have them write a hot check to buy groceries because they paid an un-expected car repair? Would we rather have them starve? Will the banks give them options to cover bills on a signature loan? NO! All the banks want are the fees and the checks STILL don't get paid. WIN-WIN, if you are a banker! As for the post above- I find it even more sickening that you actually are worried about what YOU get paid- YOU would be the one that's all for raising rates to consumers IF you were paid more! Why work and represent something you don't think has value? Hypocrite! QUIT and find a different job then- maybe as a banker- that way you can charge $30.00 for a returned check that was $10.00 or $30.00 in OD for buying dinner for your family at McDonald's- say, what's the interest rate on that???? You are in it for YOUR OWN gain- you made that VERY obvious with your post! Disgusting.
Corker shaping payday loan rules in financial reform package
Cora- by all means, protect them! Give them your number so that when they need to pay an emergency visit to the doctor or pick up medicine or pay for a car repair that wasn't in their payday to payday budget- YOU can loan them the money! Glad to see you step up! Or- did you mean by protecting them- we take away their options so they can't go to the emergency room, pay for a prescription or fix their car? Exactly what is your idea of "protection"? I guaranty you that people that vote against payday loans have never had to have one! I mean, if you have used the service- you certainly wouldn't be against it right? So, how about we ask the people that are affected by it- the customers.
Corker shaping payday loan rules in financial reform package
Are we serious? We are talking about another regulation that takes choices away from people that already don't have many options? Is it better to have them write a hot check to buy groceries because they paid an un-expected car repair? Would we rather have them starve? Will the banks give them options to cover bills on a signature loan? NO! All the banks want are the fees and the checks STILL don't get paid. WIN-WIN, if you are a banker! As for the post above- I find it even more sickening that you actually are worried about what YOU get paid- YOU would be the one that's all for raising rates to consumers IF you were paid more! Why work and represent something you don't think has value? Hypocrite! QUIT and find a different job then- maybe as a banker- that way you can charge $30.00 for a returned check that was $10.00 or $30.00 in OD for buying dinner for your family at McDonald's- say, what's the interest rate on that???? You are in it for YOUR OWN gain- you made that VERY obvious with your post! Disgusting.