Orr is a perfect example of devolution of the spieces. Either that, or he was allowed to play with lead-based paint chips as a child that resulted in permanent developmental damage.
Easy123, what are the complex mathematical calculations to calculate the probability that Orr needs to be confined to a padded cell and only be allowed to write with crayons?
TonyGottlieb : do an internet search on the name Zach Wahls and watch some of the video clips about him and other children raised by gay and lesbian couples.
Stewwie, I'll break it down in simple terms the same way I had to for Conservative (verbatim) so you can understand: A) 1 man + 1 woman = LEGAL marriage. B) 1 man + 1 man = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. C) 1 woman + 1 woman = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. The difference between couple A versus couples B and C is discrimination based on one of the couples' gender which is ILLEGAL. In this country it is already legal for two unrelated people ( in some states being related as close as first cousins) of sound mind and legal age (in some states as young as 14 with parent's consent, so I wouldn't use the "pervert" word too loudly, IMHO) to marry. All we want is the laws to be applied equally according to the 14th Amendment, which; according to the Constitution; federal laws supersedes state laws banning marriage equality. So, just to start off, trying to ban us from marriage violates Full Faith And Creditablity Clause, the 1st, 9th, and the 14th Amendments, and federal laws against gender discrimination.
Orr, why do people with your opinions completely contradict yourselves repeatedly? First you demonize gays and lesbians as permiscuous. Then when we want the same civil rights (legal recognition) of being in a monogamous relationship you rant, rave and blow snot everywhere about it. Make up your mind. Which one is it? BTW, the reason the suicide rate is 30% higher for lgbt teens than other teens is because of cretins like you telling them that they're worthless unless they "change" who they are naturally, and that they should try to "cure" themselves. Their blood is on YOUR hands.
Conservative, I'll break it down in simple terms that you can understand: A) 1 man + 1 woman = LEGAL marriage. B) 1 man + 1 man = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. C) 1 woman + 1 woman = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. The difference between couple A versus couples B and C is discrimination based on one of the couples' gender which is ILLEGAL. In this country it is already legal for two unrelated people ( in some states being related as close as first cousins) of sound mind and legal age (in some states as young as 14 with parent's consent, so I wouldn't use the "pervert" word too loudly, IMHO) to marry. All we want is the laws to be applied equally according to the 14th Amendment, which; according to the Constitution; federal laws supersedes state laws banning marriage equality. So, just to start off, trying to ban us from marriage violates Full Faith And Creditablity Clause, the 1st, 9th, and the 14th Amendments, and federal laws against gender discrimination.
happywithnewbulbs, You read me wrong. I agree with you. I was just pointing out the absolute lunacy of an electronic voting system that has no physical paper trail. A former person (don't remember which one) high up in FL. gov. Scott Brown's administration admitted that closing early voting a week early was to supress minority voters. But is it coincidence that the same problem with the same machines happend within 1 minute of the same time on election day when the exit polls where virtually neck and neck close during both elections? Who knows? But it would explain Rove's melt down on live tv (which was far more satisfying and enjoyable than what happened to the Wicked Witch of the West). A very good documentary called "Hacking Democracy" spells it out in detail.
'Gardens remember victims of violence' and other letters to the editors
Orr is a perfect example of devolution of the spieces. Either that, or he was allowed to play with lead-based paint chips as a child that resulted in permanent developmental damage.
Government and marriage
Easy123, what are the complex mathematical calculations to calculate the probability that Orr needs to be confined to a padded cell and only be allowed to write with crayons?
Government and marriage
TonyGottlieb : do an internet search on the name Zach Wahls and watch some of the video clips about him and other children raised by gay and lesbian couples.
Government and marriage
Stewwie, I'll break it down in simple terms the same way I had to for Conservative (verbatim) so you can understand: A) 1 man + 1 woman = LEGAL marriage. B) 1 man + 1 man = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. C) 1 woman + 1 woman = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. The difference between couple A versus couples B and C is discrimination based on one of the couples' gender which is ILLEGAL. In this country it is already legal for two unrelated people ( in some states being related as close as first cousins) of sound mind and legal age (in some states as young as 14 with parent's consent, so I wouldn't use the "pervert" word too loudly, IMHO) to marry. All we want is the laws to be applied equally according to the 14th Amendment, which; according to the Constitution; federal laws supersedes state laws banning marriage equality. So, just to start off, trying to ban us from marriage violates Full Faith And Creditablity Clause, the 1st, 9th, and the 14th Amendments, and federal laws against gender discrimination.
Equal rights for marriage
Orr, why do people with your opinions completely contradict yourselves repeatedly? First you demonize gays and lesbians as permiscuous. Then when we want the same civil rights (legal recognition) of being in a monogamous relationship you rant, rave and blow snot everywhere about it. Make up your mind. Which one is it? BTW, the reason the suicide rate is 30% higher for lgbt teens than other teens is because of cretins like you telling them that they're worthless unless they "change" who they are naturally, and that they should try to "cure" themselves. Their blood is on YOUR hands.
Equal rights for marriage
Orr, lesbians have the lowest rates for any STDs. So by your reasoning, lesbians must be the Annoited People.
Equal rights for marriage
Conservative, I'll break it down in simple terms that you can understand: A) 1 man + 1 woman = LEGAL marriage. B) 1 man + 1 man = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. C) 1 woman + 1 woman = BANNED from marriage in 41 states. The difference between couple A versus couples B and C is discrimination based on one of the couples' gender which is ILLEGAL. In this country it is already legal for two unrelated people ( in some states being related as close as first cousins) of sound mind and legal age (in some states as young as 14 with parent's consent, so I wouldn't use the "pervert" word too loudly, IMHO) to marry. All we want is the laws to be applied equally according to the 14th Amendment, which; according to the Constitution; federal laws supersedes state laws banning marriage equality. So, just to start off, trying to ban us from marriage violates Full Faith And Creditablity Clause, the 1st, 9th, and the 14th Amendments, and federal laws against gender discrimination.
Equal rights for marriage
Que the ranting, raving, false equivalencies, and sanctimonious head explosions in three... two... one...
Obama's way or the highway
George Will and Bobby Jindal summed it up pefectly. Watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s09KAd...
Whiskey not worth jobs it would make and other letters to the editors
happywithnewbulbs, You read me wrong. I agree with you. I was just pointing out the absolute lunacy of an electronic voting system that has no physical paper trail. A former person (don't remember which one) high up in FL. gov. Scott Brown's administration admitted that closing early voting a week early was to supress minority voters. But is it coincidence that the same problem with the same machines happend within 1 minute of the same time on election day when the exit polls where virtually neck and neck close during both elections? Who knows? But it would explain Rove's melt down on live tv (which was far more satisfying and enjoyable than what happened to the Wicked Witch of the West). A very good documentary called "Hacking Democracy" spells it out in detail.