Stewwie's comment history

Stewwie said...

My understanding is that the NFL did a relatively thorough investigation, but maybe they did not. Agreed that if they could have acquired more info/evidence and didn't, that's on them. But I disagree that they put their head in the sand. Issuing a 2-game suspension means they clearly addressed the situation at hand. But as said before, if the Ravens could have done more, they should have. Let them decide if they want a known wife-beater representing their team. If the fans don't like it, they should stop coming to games.

Goodell changed his stance because he lacks confidence in his ability to make good decisions. Period. Assuming he did his homework in this and got advice from trusted folks around him, he should be able to make as fair of a decision as possible. Instead, he has let the general public cloud his judgment after the fact, and he wishes he could have a do-over. Not a good sign for a leader.

Agreed that the NFL's indefinite suspension after Rice got cut is odd. Again, I think it's simply a sign of weak leadership.

BL, good question.

September 10, 2014 at 12:26 p.m.
Stewwie said...

I read Kareem's op-ed to Time last night, Jay, and I agree with him 100%. Good to see that he has a reasonable perspective on the Levenson letter. Levenson is only apologizing due to white guilt.

Jay, as I've said before, you need to be taking your frustration in the Rice episode out on the Ravens organization and/or the justice system for not doing more, not Goodell. Yes, the NFL should have stuck with its original 2-game suspension decision. This latest video has not added to anything that was known before. It's merely fanning the flames of discontent among public opinion. And unfortunately for the Rices, they are having to re-live this regrettable episode over and over and over again. At some point, can't we just let them move on?

September 10, 2014 at 10:31 a.m.
Stewwie said...

If Obama had a son, he'd look like Luol Deng.

It's past time for one of these "victims" such as Deng to step out and say something like, "While I don't agree with the comments made about me, I don't take personal offense to them." The libs would go nuts. But that's about what it would take to help prevent unnecessary and exaggerated reactions from the media and the affected organizations.

September 9, 2014 at 3:16 p.m.
Stewwie said...

Jay, we need to be clear that Danny Ferry was simply reading a scouting report on Deng. The "offensive" comment was "he has a little African in him. Not in a bad way, but he's like a guy who would have a nice store out front but sell you counterfeit stuff out of the back."

Not sure I fully understand how/why that description was given of Deng, but I see nothing racist about that at all. If you want to say it was inaccurate or mean, fine. But someone should not be disciplined over an inaccurate or mean scouting report. Especially when it was intended to only be an internal conversation.

This is ridiculous. The new thin-skinned, overly sensitive, PC-America is winning another battle. Not only that, but this is the reality of the Adam Silver-led NBA. And no, that's not a good thing.

September 9, 2014 at 10:27 a.m.
Stewwie said...

JMC, not sure what Durden's contract is (years and money), but if neither is an issue, he's definitely on the hot seat right now. Again, I'm not understanding why the offense looks like it does. Maybe bad protection is part of it, but our O-line ought to be more than prepared after facing our stout D-line in practice. And where is James Stovall on the depth chart? How come that guy is never in the game at WR?

September 8, 2014 at 1:53 p.m.
Stewwie said...

Any Rushmore of female singers needs to include Mariah Carey. Period. I'll go Carey, Houston, Aretha, and Diana Ross.

I hope Ruby Falls isn't paying a flat rate for their sponsored first downs at Finley. Didn't hear the name called one time during the first half! I'm okay with that though; no offense to Ruby Falls, but I wish the sponsored first down would go away. Just add a buck to everyone's ticket to add more revenue.

Any chance Russ will let the D play both sides of the ball going forward? Wow. Can't believe how awful our offense looks. I know we're better than that. Gotta be. If not, Durden won't last past this season.

Any thoughts on the Mocs punting on 4th and 1 from midfield with 2 minutes left? I actually thought it was the right move given how poorly our offense was playing. Any run up the middle would have been stuffed for a loss. Maybe a Jacob naked bootleg would have worked, but that's a big maybe.

No excuse for the 2nd-half onside kickoff. Bad idea and poorly executed. That strategy would have made sense if our offense was playing great and the D wasn't. But it was the other way around on Saturday.

I read the Hawks' owner's email from 2 years ago and I honestly don't see what is wrong with anything that he said. Even black people were commenting on articles yesterday saying it was not offensive. There's something strange about the whole thing though. Maybe he was being blackmailed into 'fessing up himself. Or...he saw how much of a payday Sterling just got for his club and he's trying to dig up his own to dirt to help speed a sale at a high price.

Jay, for the mailbag, do you think there was anything wrong with what Levenson said in his letter? If he didn't voluntarily choose to sell, should Silver have forced him to sell?

September 8, 2014 at 12:21 p.m.
Stewwie said...

Joan Rivers was asked recently if we'd see a woman president first or a gay president. Her response was that we already have a gay president. Lol. I won't say what she said about Michelle. Ouch.

I like Brown, Payton, Sanders, and Tomlinson on the Rushmore. Yes, Tomlinson. Emmitt is overrated. Agreed Peterson could end up there though. And Chas, there's no ban on mentioning OJ. Nor should there be.

I watched Federer make a big comeback last night after being 2 sets down. And he had to save 2 match points in the 4th set to push it to the 5th. It's gotta be the shoes! (He worked with MJ recently to design a new shoe. Even got MJ to come watch his first round match. Awesome.)

I'll give Jacob Huesman this...he works hard, he's poised, and he's a good competitor. That said, I am not yet seeing much development from year to year. Part of that may be due to the coaching too. Either way, I am hoping to see some bigger things from him this year.

September 5, 2014 at 1:54 p.m.
Stewwie said...

[Does that count as a win or a loss for the picks?]

To be fair, it should still count as a loss. You were willing to take the Tigers at -5. Plus, I'm sure there are other times when a winning pick based on Thursday's line would have turned into a losing pick based on Saturday's line.

[Offensive player of the year — Drew Brees, Green Bay]

Brees or Rodgers? I like LeSean McCoy for this award.

Love the Broncos pick to win it all.

I'm a little surprised that Pasquali is picking the upset on Sat. with the Mocs over Jax. St.

The U.S. Open has been exciting even though it's disappointing that the last American man went out in the 3rd round. On clay, I would understand. But on hard court and grass, we should be doing better than that. Anyway, here's hoping that Fed and the Djoker meet in the Finals on Monday.

September 4, 2014 at 10:31 a.m.
Stewwie said...
September 3, 2014 at 3:32 p.m.
Stewwie said...

BL,

Agreed that the loss of draft picks would be a better/more appropriate punishment for Irsay and the Colts instead of a fine and/or suspension.

Repeating as champ is harder in today's NFL than the other sports because of the combination of a hard cap and free agency. The parity levels the field each year. As a result, dynasties are long gone from the league. And generally speaking, football teams have it harder to repeat in that it's do or die in the playoffs (unlike the other sports that have playoff series).

Brady: "When I suck, I'll retire." Then why are you still playing, bro? Lol. (Just kiddin', Spy.)

September 3, 2014 at 2:15 p.m.
advertisement

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.