TOES02800's comment history

TOES02800 said...

Shameless seemed to have forgotten THAT little tidbit.

How about Kennedy?

I guess 58,209 deaths isn't as bad as 4,488. As long a democrat was calling the shots.

March 18, 2014 at 2:40 p.m.
TOES02800 said...

"Now the REAL REPUBLICANS want you out of their party but they don't have the guts to put you out."--Ibshamed

It's amazing how you seem to want what's best for the republican party.

Your attitude of, "If the republicans just do what we say they would be great" is extremely amusing. Your anger that the world doesn't think like you is laughable.

March 18, 2014 at 10:37 a.m.
TOES02800 said...

I thought Obama was supposed to be better than GWB. According to alpo, not so.

Liberal mantra of the day: Move forward. While living in the past.

March 18, 2014 at 10:25 a.m.
TOES02800 said...

Maybe so Nancy. Maybe so. I would say that's a reasonable opinion.

March 18, 2014 at 1:29 a.m.
TOES02800 said...

Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility'

Obama HAS become more flexible in that he's bending over pretty well, and taking it from Putin.

March 18, 2014 at 1:22 a.m.
TOES02800 said...


Venice votes on cutting ties with Italy...

State TV says Russia could turn USA to 'radioactive ash'..

OPT OUT! Many Americans intend to stay without health insurance...



Drudge gets it.

Too bad about the red crayons in the GA's crayon box.

March 18, 2014 at 1:09 a.m.
TOES02800 said...

Sheer brilliance!!

March 18, 2014 at 12:41 a.m.
TOES02800 said...

PT's right. Clinton gave saddam years to move his WMD's. Remember all the times Saddam kicked the inspectors out of Iraq? Clinton did nothing but acquiesce. Fearful of stirring up his anti-war base prior to re-erection(sic).

March 17, 2014 at 2:41 p.m.
TOES02800 said...

From the same article:

Democrats Clamor For War...

A number of Democrats were ringing the warning bells of Saddam Hussein's quest for WMD's long before 9/11 or the Bush presidency.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." — President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." — Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb 18, 1998 "Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 Post 9/11 Democrats Call For War...

A few examples of the call for war on the left-side of the aisle include:

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region. I will vote yes because I believe it is the best way to hold Saddam Hussein accountable." — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002 "It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East which, as we know all too well, affects American security." — Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

If you have evidence that Bush did this all on his own shame, please share.

March 17, 2014 at 2:33 p.m.
TOES02800 said...

Shame never misses an opportunity to Bush bash.

"However, of the left-of-center Annenberg Foundation cites a different story."

"As cited, although found after-the-fact to be at least partially incorrect, the intelligence President Bush had in regards to Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) was shared with the U.S. Congress":

"The CIA and most other US intelligence agencies believed before the war that Saddam had stocks of biological and chemical weapons, was actively working on nuclear weapons and 'probably' would have a nuclear weapon before the end of this decade.

That faulty intelligence was shared with Congress – along with multiple mentions of some doubts within the intelligence community – in a formal National Intelligence Estimate just prior to the Senate and House votes to authorize the use of force against Iraq." Fact Check went on to state:

"No hard evidence has surfaced to support claims that Bush somehow manipulated the findings of intelligence analysts.

In fact, two [Congressional] bipartisan investigations probed for such evidence and said they found none."

March 17, 2014 at 2:30 p.m.

Find a Business

400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, Permissions, Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2014, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.