aae1049's comment history

aae1049 said...

Comical, calling me left. No Child Left Behind was enacted by Republicans, silly. Bush signed the bill. If you have students that wish to learn, a failing school is the last place they belong. It is immoral to take school choice away from students that wish to lift themselves out of poverty.

The HCDE only responds to lawsuits, I know.

May 28, 2012 at 10:40 a.m.
aae1049 said...

The primary issue here is that a child living in an impoverished neighborhood and zoned for a failing school, no longer has an option to attend a higher preforming school. Now, being poor means a lower quality education, with no options. So being poor means the education opportunities are indeed NOT EQUAL. I cannot believe there are not grounds to file a lawsuit against the HCDE for what is an act of discrimination based upon socioeconomic status. Where are the young and energetic lawyers willing to take this case on? Sickening.

May 28, 2012 at 12:50 a.m.
aae1049 said...

There has been pervasive violations of bid law with extensive proof. The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is a joke, and knows all about city malfeasance and has failed miserable in protecting the public. Harry Austin you are an enabler of malfeasance in local gov, and you follow whatever the power structure wants, and are not credible. TFP omission of facts is the same as blatant lying.

http://littlechicagowatch.com/2012/02/bid-law-violated-in-high-place/

http://littlechicagowatch.com/2012/02/land-transaction/

http://littlechicagowatch.com/2012/02/littlefield-recall-foul-taxpayer-staff-equipment-and-resources/

May 11, 2012 at 9:08 p.m.
aae1049 said...

As a consumer of news, I view the depth and detail of TV Channel 3 news pieces as the best due to substantive and original content. I am simply amazed at the level of talent at Channel 3, they seem to have less resources, but produce a much superior evening news hour. Channel 3 will also research or investigate, where the competitors seem to parrot other sources.

April 29, 2012 at 12:22 a.m.
aae1049 said...

Significant costs and factors have been omitted from your calculations. You omitted the maintenance requirements for this intensive green roof. Are you assuming that this sod will not require soil replacement for 50 years, and that the "green" roof will not require irrigation and watering during our July/August temperatures? In fact, there is not an allowance for the maintenance demands for sod, or the soils, or the irrigation systems.

As a long-term NPDES stormwater professional, I appreciate viable water quality measures that have a reasonable cost/benefit return. The Green Roof, like the Blue Rhino fail to meet reasonable benchmarks.

The maintenance expenditures for the Outdoor Chattanooga roof should have been examined.

April 25, 2012 at 12:22 a.m.
aae1049 said...

Joneses, you are smart.

March 22, 2012 at 7:35 p.m.
aae1049 said...

More women graduate from 4-year universities, earn graduate degrees than men, and are the deciding factor on how household money is spent. As a general rule, I am more intelligent that the majority of men, so I do not feel victim to any male notions of taking benefits away. The GOP is not after women, if they are we will out lobby them. They will never get a bill passed.

March 12, 2012 at 8:12 p.m.
aae1049 said...

Oppose giving our taxpayer dollars to any business entity in secret. Spending our tax dollars is our business. To conduct that business in secret a precursor to abuse with public money. Great work Ron Ramsey.

March 12, 2012 at 5:58 a.m.
aae1049 said...

Mr. Editor,

You are having moments of clarity on the issue of appointments. Your Dem leanings are usually way far in left field, or dinner and a date with the power structure of Chattanooga.

In the case of appointments, you are right on target. When an official cannot complete a term, for health reasons, or indicted, ie TN Waltz, Sheriff...whatever, the protocol should be a caretaker appointment, who agrees not to seek the office, and not to endorse. The person appointed to a vacated seat leverages an incumbency advantage, absent of the will of the people, called voters. Regardless of political beliefs, the process of filling a vacated elected office must have more of the will of the voters, than a few votes of elected officials.

In most cases, the popular vote, and the appointment vote have absolutely no relationship. Let the voters decide.

BTW, you are past due in writing another editorial about Andy Berke, it has been 6 days.

April

March 6, 2012 at 8:26 a.m.
aae1049 said...

BTW Who appoints School Board member Everett Fairchilds vacated seat, the school board or commission?

The school board appointment needs to include the will of the people or voters, since the term does not end until 2014. The last election when Mr. Fairchild prevailed or was reelected, there were other contenders. Marty Haynes was 2nd and Ken Smith was 3rd. Who ever appoints that seat needs to appoint either Marty Haynes or Ken Smith. That was the will of the people, called voters.

March 3, 2012 at 11:41 a.m.
advertisement
400 East 11th St., Chattanooga, TN 37403
General Information (423) 756-6900
Copyright, permissions and privacy policy, Ethics policy - Copyright ©2012, Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
This document may not be reprinted without the express written permission of Chattanooga Publishing Company, Inc.