JT wrote: "I notice alprova has wisely already slinked off and left you to take it all by yourself. I don't know if it is his age that gave him the wisdom to skate while the skating was good by he did skunk you."
I have no intention of posting the man's full name or anything personal about him.
There is at least one poster, who doesn't think very much of me who could easily post my full name and physical address. He has vowed not to do it, and neither will I of anyone else.
JT wrote: "Don't you think that alprova's and Easy123's actions over the last few days speak volumes in support of anonymous posting titles?"
Huh?
"This shows that there are people of such arrogance and dogmatic drive for their position that they think nothing of exposing their enemies personal information to shame them from entering or continuing the debate."
Quoting Silvester Stallone, "He drew first blood."
"Its no different than, for example, outing a homosexual to marginalize their message or to harm them financially, socially, or emotionally for positions they hold."
Jackie boy doesn't work for a living, and thus, has no position to marginalize.
"People that practice this form of assault should be shunned for for their lack of any ethics when interacting with other people."
Oh...PLEASE shun me. I'd love nothing more than for you to completely ignore my posts.
"This also has a message for those that would demand the identities of those that wish to band together for political activism."
Oh brother. I guess I should have seen THAT one coming from you.
"The real reason for that is not for transparency but primarily to identify those people who you consider your enemy so they can be assaulted in the same way."
It would be best for people to offer complete respect at all times for their foes, even when they feel safe behind a wall that they believe to lends to them any feeling that they are anonymous. That way, assault does not cross the mind of their enemy.
'cause the simple fact is, that you never know who has access to information that can pinpoint you to where you sleep.
jesse wrote: "P.T. is doin the same thing Al and Easy and everyone else on here is doin! He's havin his say and injoyin hisself and if Al And Easy and anyone else on here that thinks he needs to toe the "Alprova" line to get along prob. could kiss his arz!"
Of course you would agree with him, for your contributions of late seem to consist of attacking people as well.
I could not care less what people do in their lives, but you and Jack like two peas in a pod, in that you two simply cannot refrain from offering snarky comments about others.
I knew about his little personal problem months ago. When someone else brought it up and he denied it, and given that he has again cranked up with the snide comments, I saw no reason to allow him to wiggle out of it.
You and everyone else is free to believe whatever you wish, and I'm done bring up the issue, for it truly is his business, but if he wants to continue with the snide, unprovoked commentary, there are people who can dish out the same, and yes...I'm one of them.
Pay attention. TEN YEARS ago, outside of the southside of Chicago, Barack Obama was unknown to the rest of the UNited States.
"The left wing media did there best to downplay and withhold information in 2008."
That's crap served in a chef salad.
"To anyone who was informed he turned out to be exactly what we thought he was, an anti-American, a statist, and someone who craps on the Constitution."
Oh...so you consider yourself informed?
"He's a lazy guy who believes he's entitled to be where he is, and he's angry."
Well Sir, I do remind you that he is where he is because the majority of the people in this nation voted for him.
What's he got to be angry about?
"It's pretty clear, crystal clear, that he's used the IRS as a weapon. To deny that is just stupid."
Watch and see this "scandal" go down in flames too. All the false outrage in the world will not pin it on the President.
It's amazing to me that there are so many otherwise normal people, who are convinced that a man who was virtually unknown to Americans a decade ago, has wielded all this alleged power to ruin what they have determined to be a great nation.
There are actually people holding the belief that if Obama is not impeached, that he will crown himself King and be the last elected President. I actually heard a man say that today.
In all seriousness, I cannot think of one thing that President Obama has done that could begin to be considered an act that could be construed as grabbing power.
I'd love to read some SERIOUS, LOGICAL, and VALID examples, if anyone has anything to offer.
Don't even start with something about the recent scandals, as there is not a shred of evidence that the President was involved with, had knowledge of, or is remotely responsible for any of them, and the Republican strategy to pin them on his lapel have fallen flat at every turn.
What is all this "power" that President Obama has seized that has so many people fearful that our nation is becoming one that is poised to transform into something akin to tyranny?
You may not live in the area now, but you did on January 31, 2013, when you didn't post until 12:10 pm because you were downtown in court for your 9:00 am case, and just as coincidentally it was on that same date that you last logged in as Rebus and then recently reappeared as Plain Truth in April.
Hey...lots of people are experiencing financial setbacks these days.
I have spent the last six months compiling an alphabetical list of folks who have filed bankruptcy within a 50 mile radius of my business to protect my myself from potential credit risks.
There are people who have filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy up to four times in the past three years. I ain't loaning a dime to anyone who I suspect is gonna run off to the nearest bankruptcy Attorney to keep from paying what they owe.
I had a criminal case judgment put on hold when the crook filed for bankruptcy to wiggle out of it. This guy owes hundreds of thousands that he stole from several businesses masquerading as a contractor. He got more than $14,000 from me.
My objection to his bankruptcy was totally disregarded, even after submitting the criminal conviction court record to the bankruptcy Judge. I am now unable to get a judgment against him and what he owes me is now a non-priority, unsecured claim. I'll never see a dime. I spent three grand trying to prosecute him.
So, people like myself are going to have to protect ourselves by utilizing everything at our disposal to know as much about a person as can be possibly found, before they have a chance to beat someone out of their money.
We can't depend on the courts to protect us. Five convictions in five counties, and the jerk is still free to go out and victimize people some more.
And that's a-okay, so long as he pays a set amount to the bankruptcy trustee, which passes on most of it to the courts.
Hey...PT, you're probably a decent fellow, for all I know. You may have filed for relief due to medical bills. Whatever the case may be, I wish you no ill will and this is the last I am going to write about it.
The Critic
JT wrote: "I notice alprova has wisely already slinked off and left you to take it all by yourself. I don't know if it is his age that gave him the wisdom to skate while the skating was good by he did skunk you."
I have no intention of posting the man's full name or anything personal about him.
There is at least one poster, who doesn't think very much of me who could easily post my full name and physical address. He has vowed not to do it, and neither will I of anyone else.
The Critic
PT wrote: "In the end, cowards will be cowards."
I'm sorry, but I simply have to do this...
Bwahahahahahahahaw :')>---
The Critic
JT wrote: "Don't you think that alprova's and Easy123's actions over the last few days speak volumes in support of anonymous posting titles?"
Huh?
"This shows that there are people of such arrogance and dogmatic drive for their position that they think nothing of exposing their enemies personal information to shame them from entering or continuing the debate."
Quoting Silvester Stallone, "He drew first blood."
"Its no different than, for example, outing a homosexual to marginalize their message or to harm them financially, socially, or emotionally for positions they hold."
Jackie boy doesn't work for a living, and thus, has no position to marginalize.
"People that practice this form of assault should be shunned for for their lack of any ethics when interacting with other people."
Oh...PLEASE shun me. I'd love nothing more than for you to completely ignore my posts.
"This also has a message for those that would demand the identities of those that wish to band together for political activism."
Oh brother. I guess I should have seen THAT one coming from you.
"The real reason for that is not for transparency but primarily to identify those people who you consider your enemy so they can be assaulted in the same way."
It would be best for people to offer complete respect at all times for their foes, even when they feel safe behind a wall that they believe to lends to them any feeling that they are anonymous. That way, assault does not cross the mind of their enemy.
'cause the simple fact is, that you never know who has access to information that can pinpoint you to where you sleep.
The Critic
PT wrote: "So ALPO, does "dish it out" make false accusations ok?"
If they were false, yes. But your continued protests are doing you in on the issue.
"Had no idea you would be so sensitive."
Likewise. You're squealing like a little piglet.
"BTW, there is nothing to "wiggle" out of. I've never lived or even driven thru the locations of the so-called "personal problem"."
Prove it.
"Do yourself a favor and apologize."
Not this time. You're getting a piece of your own conduct thrown back in your face. Deal with it.
"Your credibility has taken a blow"
Do you really think so?
"Advice: Don't listen to your little serial liar friend, Easy."
You're wrong to believe that. I found your bankruptcy months ago.
"Stick to what you do best...bloviating and gas-bagging. You pompous jag-off."
You reap what you sow.
"And lay-off Jesse. He offers up more sense in 50 words than you do in your War & Peace like postings."
Your opinion is of no consequence and maybe you haven't been paying attention, but Jesse is a big boy. You've got enough on your plate at the moment.
The Critic
jesse wrote: "P.T. is doin the same thing Al and Easy and everyone else on here is doin! He's havin his say and injoyin hisself and if Al And Easy and anyone else on here that thinks he needs to toe the "Alprova" line to get along prob. could kiss his arz!"
Of course you would agree with him, for your contributions of late seem to consist of attacking people as well.
I could not care less what people do in their lives, but you and Jack like two peas in a pod, in that you two simply cannot refrain from offering snarky comments about others.
I knew about his little personal problem months ago. When someone else brought it up and he denied it, and given that he has again cranked up with the snide comments, I saw no reason to allow him to wiggle out of it.
You and everyone else is free to believe whatever you wish, and I'm done bring up the issue, for it truly is his business, but if he wants to continue with the snide, unprovoked commentary, there are people who can dish out the same, and yes...I'm one of them.
The Critic
I'm still waiting for examples of powers that President Obama has imposed upon himself and examples of rights that he is supposed to have trampled.
I hear crickets...
The Critic
BRP, I have a very serious question for you.
What rights has Barack Obama taken from you since he has been President that you did not have before he arrived on the scene?
The Critic
zableedofisterix wrote: "Obama wasn't unknown."
Pay attention. TEN YEARS ago, outside of the southside of Chicago, Barack Obama was unknown to the rest of the UNited States.
"The left wing media did there best to downplay and withhold information in 2008."
That's crap served in a chef salad.
"To anyone who was informed he turned out to be exactly what we thought he was, an anti-American, a statist, and someone who craps on the Constitution."
Oh...so you consider yourself informed?
"He's a lazy guy who believes he's entitled to be where he is, and he's angry."
Well Sir, I do remind you that he is where he is because the majority of the people in this nation voted for him.
What's he got to be angry about?
"It's pretty clear, crystal clear, that he's used the IRS as a weapon. To deny that is just stupid."
Watch and see this "scandal" go down in flames too. All the false outrage in the world will not pin it on the President.
The Critic
It's amazing to me that there are so many otherwise normal people, who are convinced that a man who was virtually unknown to Americans a decade ago, has wielded all this alleged power to ruin what they have determined to be a great nation.
There are actually people holding the belief that if Obama is not impeached, that he will crown himself King and be the last elected President. I actually heard a man say that today.
In all seriousness, I cannot think of one thing that President Obama has done that could begin to be considered an act that could be construed as grabbing power.
I'd love to read some SERIOUS, LOGICAL, and VALID examples, if anyone has anything to offer.
Don't even start with something about the recent scandals, as there is not a shred of evidence that the President was involved with, had knowledge of, or is remotely responsible for any of them, and the Republican strategy to pin them on his lapel have fallen flat at every turn.
What is all this "power" that President Obama has seized that has so many people fearful that our nation is becoming one that is poised to transform into something akin to tyranny?
The Cover-Up
You may not live in the area now, but you did on January 31, 2013, when you didn't post until 12:10 pm because you were downtown in court for your 9:00 am case, and just as coincidentally it was on that same date that you last logged in as Rebus and then recently reappeared as Plain Truth in April.
Hey...lots of people are experiencing financial setbacks these days.
I have spent the last six months compiling an alphabetical list of folks who have filed bankruptcy within a 50 mile radius of my business to protect my myself from potential credit risks.
There are people who have filed for chapter 13 bankruptcy up to four times in the past three years. I ain't loaning a dime to anyone who I suspect is gonna run off to the nearest bankruptcy Attorney to keep from paying what they owe.
I had a criminal case judgment put on hold when the crook filed for bankruptcy to wiggle out of it. This guy owes hundreds of thousands that he stole from several businesses masquerading as a contractor. He got more than $14,000 from me.
My objection to his bankruptcy was totally disregarded, even after submitting the criminal conviction court record to the bankruptcy Judge. I am now unable to get a judgment against him and what he owes me is now a non-priority, unsecured claim. I'll never see a dime. I spent three grand trying to prosecute him.
So, people like myself are going to have to protect ourselves by utilizing everything at our disposal to know as much about a person as can be possibly found, before they have a chance to beat someone out of their money.
We can't depend on the courts to protect us. Five convictions in five counties, and the jerk is still free to go out and victimize people some more.
And that's a-okay, so long as he pays a set amount to the bankruptcy trustee, which passes on most of it to the courts.
Hey...PT, you're probably a decent fellow, for all I know. You may have filed for relief due to medical bills. Whatever the case may be, I wish you no ill will and this is the last I am going to write about it.
You play nice and so will I.