Z-man wrote: "You wouldn't have the balls to stand in front of Clarence Thomas or Thomas Sowell and call them an "uncle tom" Coward."
Why? Would they pull out a gun like a thug and shoot a white man who called them that?
"You epitomize the arrogant, elitist liberal who thinks he has some magic connection with the black community and decides what a black person should believe. Stupid ass."
One thing is for sure...you type your talking points over and over and over and over. You've got nothing new, and you haven't had anything new for months.
It's the same crap from you EVERY single day.
What's whacked is the fact that he or she referred to you as an ally.
I deal with criticism all the time, but it usually comes from people I know or have been dealing with for quite some time.
For this dude to suddenly come in, declare you his ally, and feign intelligence, is quite laughable.
Yeah...I think you made this clown up. You're a bonafide troll, so I wouldn't put nothing past you. It's an expected behavior of a troll seeking some renewed attention.
Fairmon, no one is stopping you from posting anything you have on your mind, are they?
You're equally free to overlook anyone's posts you don't want to read.
You DO know how to use a scrolling wheel on your mouse, don't you?
Jackie wrote: "So Alpo, it seems others are beginning finally to see thru your lying personna."
I would not put it past you to create a new identity and to have posted that crap all by yourself. Whatever the case is, I'm not bothered in the least by anyone you can recruit or create yourself to boost your ridiculous stature in this forum.
"Btw, how's that working off the books workin out for you? A cheat and a liar."
You have absolutely no idea whatsoever what it is I do or to what degree I am involved with anything.
Again...you're totally pathetic.
"pathetic little gimp. I should feel sorry for you. But can't manage it."
I'm walking again, thank you. I don't need anyone to feel sorry for me, for I am a survivor. So you just keep on making up people to support you in this forum.
It doesn't get any more pathetic than that.
Connie wrote: "He is either lying again or doesn't have a clue what the meaning of "begotten" is as pertaining to Jesus Christ."
Sir, that is Miriam Webster's definition. You're not going to assert that the definition of the word is different because it appears in the Bible, from any other traditional use of the word, are you?
Yeah, I guess you are, but it's bullsh!t and you know it.
Begotten: father: to be the father of a child.
Kinda blows that trinity theory out of the water, don'tcha think?
That's very typical of Connie. When he is cornered, he just moves on to another victim.
He was so arrogant awhile ago, when he thought that he had me cornered.
What a dumbass...
Why do you seek out stories about gay behavior, Connie?
Connie wrote: "I am not going to post the link tonight that he accuses me of lying about."
What's the matter, are you so computer savvy that you cannot post a link?
"I want him to keep repeating his lie so I can expose him once again."
It's not my lie. You offered the claim.
"If anyone is interested in the article you can search: "Gay Bathhouses Nationwide Face Uncertain Future"
You're still in hot water. The Times Free Press did not publish that story.
"There will be numerous cites carrying the story, some with a picture of two sodomites on wooden chaise lounges dressed in towels."
Did you get a woody when you saw them and wish you were between the two of them?
"As long as Mr. Anthony Provancher keeps calling me a liar on the matter, I will probably milk it before I post one with the picture."
I don't care what you do, but your initial statement is still a lie. The Times Free Press did not carry that story.
So the next question is, Why are you seeking out news stories about gay behavior?
Landgrabbr wrote: "I do not know if you realize the fact but it is people, losers, such as you to which I was referring."
Oh I know that, but I don't care, because you are a morph of someone who has also hung around in here for years yourself, aren't you?
"I hope that you are not implying that since I "ain't from round here" that I do not have the right to post my opinion on this thread."
Like I stated...post what you want. Don't expect that it will be worth a damn to anyone but yourself.
"Typical of a naysayer such as yourself, who watches as his city falter and wain, doing nothing but posing as an armchair quarterback, as new blood and foreign investment raise the Phoenix (Chattanooga) out of its ashes."
I'm not a Chattanoogan, so you might want to rethink your synopsis there.
"I have read your whining posts and no, my friend, your past does not buy you a ticket into the future but anchors you to a time long gone."
Oh my goodness. Is that supposed to make me mad?
"Understand that I am no Conservative or my new ally Jack for I will meet and surpass your mediocrity with an intelligence and savvy you will not recognize nor understand. You best keep playing on your level."
Oh my God. Jackie's resorted to recruiting one of his Twitter dumdums to come help him out.
You're both pathetic.
Your first mistake was offering that you have any intelligence, or that Jackie had any as well.
But you be sure to give it your best shot, dildo twins.
Okay, you wrote it was a few days ago. The fact is, that you lied about there being such a story.
It never happened, did it?
At least tell the truth about that.