Interesting comment in the article:
"EPB has taken a different tack, preferring instead to simply charge others, like the City of Chattanooga, to build Wi-Fi on top of EPB's fiber grid."
Since City of Chattanooga owns EPB, EPB is charging them for the building out of the wireless network? So is this a double dip on the taxpayers? Or maybe a triple dip since they built most of the network with federal funds? Things that make you go hmmmmm?